Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (581) (remove)
Language
- English (581) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (145)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (96)
- Englisch (42)
- Konversationsanalyse (42)
- Wörterbuch (38)
- Interaktion (30)
- Annotation (26)
- Gesprochene Sprache (24)
- Neologismus (24)
- Computerlinguistik (23)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (268)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (108)
- Postprint (99)
- Preprint (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (248)
- Peer-Review (174)
- Verlags-Lektorat (10)
- Peer-review (4)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (2)
- (Verlags-)lektorat (1)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (77)
- IDS-Verlag (75)
- Benjamins (65)
- Springer (31)
- Niemeyer (19)
- De Gruyter (15)
- Lang (15)
- Oxford University Press (13)
- Narr (12)
- European language resources association (ELRA) (11)
- De Gruyter Mouton (10)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (10)
- Palgrave Macmillan (10)
- Routledge (7)
- The Association for Computational Linguistics (7)
- Cambridge University Press (6)
- Equinox (6)
- European Language Resources Association (6)
- Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani / Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts (6)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (5)
- Narr Francke Attempto (5)
- Peter Lang (5)
- Cambridge Scholars Publ. (4)
- Language Science Press (4)
- Mouton de Gruyter (4)
- Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group (4)
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum (4)
- Verl. für Gesprächsforschung (4)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (3)
- Buske (3)
- Cambridge Scholars Publishing (3)
- Frank & Timme (3)
- Heidelberg University Publishing (3)
- Ids-Verlag (3)
- Academia (2)
- Bournemouth University (2)
- CLARIN (2)
- John Benjamins Publishing Company (2)
- Linköping University Electronic Press (2)
- Multilingual Matters (2)
- Presses Universitaires (2)
- Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys AFinLA (2)
- TUDpress (2)
- Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (2)
- de Gruyter Mouton (2)
- Accademia della Crusca (1)
- Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis (1)
- Aisthesis (1)
- Aisthesis Verlag (1)
- Akademie Verlag (1)
- Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Zentralinstitut für Sprachwissenschaft (1)
- Aletheia (1)
- Amsterdam (1)
- Asgard (1)
- Ashgate (1)
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (1)
- Austrian academy of sciences (1)
- BBAW (1)
- BDÜ, Weiterbildungs- und Fachverlagsgesellschaft mbh (1)
- Bloomsbury (1)
- Bloomsbury Academic (1)
- Cambridge Scholars (1)
- Cascadilla Proceedings Project (1)
- Cengage (1)
- Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa (1)
- De Gruyter Oldenbourg (1)
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (1)
- Deutsches Bergbau Museum (1)
- ELDA (1)
- ELRA (1)
- Editions Tradulex (1)
- Edizioni Università di Trieste (1)
- Elsevier (1)
- Europäische Akademie (1)
- Finnish Literature Society (1)
- Foris (1)
- German Historical Institute (1)
- German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (1)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie and Computerlinguistik e.V. (1)
- Graphen & Netzwerke; AG des Verbandes Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. (1)
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences (1)
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Research Institute for Linguistics (1)
- IDS-Verlag; Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (1)
- International Pragmatics Assoc. (1)
- Izdatel´stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (1)
- John Benjamins (1)
- Kluwer (1)
- Kovac (1)
- Kyungpook National University (1)
- Köllen (1)
- L'Harmattan (1)
- Lawrence Erlbaum (1)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (1)
- Leibniz-Zentrum allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS); Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (1)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (1)
- Lincom Europa (1)
- Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet (1)
- MDPI (1)
- MIT Press (1)
- Metzler (1)
- NOVA FCSH - CLUNL (1)
- Nijmegen (1)
- Novus AS (1)
- Novus Press (1)
- Oxford Univ. Press (1)
- Paderborn University (1)
- Palgrave (1)
- Pasithee (1)
- Plural Publishing (1)
- Polish Information Processing Society (1)
- Press Universitaires Savoie Mont Blanc (1)
- Roskilde University, Department of Language and Culture (1)
- Ruta (1)
- Schneider Verlag Hohengehren (1)
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA) (1)
- Società editrice il Mulino (1)
- Société Néophilologique (1)
- Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum (1)
- Springer International Publishing (1)
- Springer-Verlag (1)
- Stauffenburg (1)
- Stockholm University (1)
- Tallinn University Press (1)
- Tartu Ülikool Narva Kolledž (1)
- UCREL (1)
- University Press of America (1)
- University of Antwerp (1)
- University of Chicago Press (1)
- University of Tartu Press (1)
- Universität Leipzig (1)
- Universität Tübingen (1)
- Universitäts-Verlag (1)
- Universitätsverlag Potsdam (1)
- V&R unipress (1)
- Verl.-Haus. Monsenstein und Vannerdat (1)
- Waxmann (1)
- Widmaier (1)
- Wiley & Sons (1)
- Wiley Blackwell (1)
- Wilfrid Laurier University Press (1)
- Winter (1)
- Založba ZRC (1)
- Zenodo (1)
- de Gryuter (1)
Speakers’ dialogical orientation to the particular others they talk to is implemented by practices of recipient-design. One such practice is the use of negation as a means to constrain interpretations of speaker’s actions by the partner. The paper situates this use of negation within the larger context of other recipient-designed uses of negation which negate assumptions the speaker makes about what the addressee holds to be true (second-order assumptions) or what the addressee assumes the speaker holds to be true (third- order assumptions). The focus of the study is on the ways in which speakers use negation to disclaim interpretations of their turns which partners have displayed or may possibly arrive at. Special emphasis is given to the positionally sensitive uses of negation, which may occur before, after or inserted between the nucleus actions whose interpretation is constrained by the negation. Interactional motivations and rhetorical potentials of the practice are pointed out, partly depending on the position of the negation vis-à-vis the nucleus action. The analysis shows that the concept of ‘recipient design’ is in need of distinctions which have not been in focus in prior research.
"Standard language" is a contested concept, ideologically, empirically and theoretically. This is particularly true for a language such as German, where the standardization of the spoken language was based on the written standard and was established with respect to a communicative situation, i.e. public speech on stage (Bühnenaussprache), which most speakers never come across. As a consequence, the norms of the oral standard exhibit many features which are infrequent in the everyday speech even of educated speakers. This paper discusses ways to arrive at a more realistic conception of (spoken) standard German, which will be termed "standard usage". It must be founded on empirical observations of speakers linguistic choices in everyday situations. Arguments in favor of a corpus-based notion of standard have to consider sociolinguistic, political, and didactic concerns. We report on the design of a large study of linguistic variation conducted at the Institute for the German Language (project "Variation in Spoken German", Variation des gesprochenen Deutsch) with the aim of arriving at a representative picture of "standard usage" in contemporary German. It systematically takes into account both diatopic variation covering the multi-national space in which German an official language, and diastratic variation in terms of varying degrees of formality. Results of the study of phonetic and morphosyntactic variation are discussed. At least for German, a corpus-based notion of "standard usage" inevitably includes some degree of pluralism concerning areal variation, and it needs to do justice to register-based variation as well.
"What makes this so complicated?" On the value of disorienting dilemmas in language instruction
(2017)
This paper focusss on the first Slavonic-Romanian lexicons, compiled in the second half of the 17th century and their use(rs), proposing a method of investigating the manner in which lexical information available in the above corpus relates, if at all, to the vocabulary of texts from the same period. We chose to investigate their relation to an anonymous Old Testament translation made from Church Slavonic, also from the second half of the 17th century, which was supposed to be produced in the same geographical area, in the same Church Slavonic school or even by the same author as the lexicons. After applying a lemmatizer on both the Biblical text (Books of Genesis and Daniel) and the Romanian material from the lexicons, we analyse the results and double the statistical analysis with a series of case studies, focusing on some common lexemes that might be an indicator of the relatedness of the texts. Even if the analysis points out that the lexicons might not have been compiled as a tool for the translation of religious texts, it proves to be a useful method that reveals interesting data and provides the basis for more extensive approaches.
In the management of cooperation, the fit of a requested action with what the addressee is presently doing is a pervasively relevant consideration. We present evidence that imperative turns are adapted to, and reflexively create, contexts in which the other person is committed to the course of action advanced by the imperative. This evidence comes from systematic variation in the design of imperative turns, relative to the fittedness of the imperatively mandated action to the addressee’s ongoing trajectory of actions, what we call the “dine of commitment”. We present four points on this dine: Responsive imperatives perform an operation on the deontic dimension of what the addressee has announced or already begun to do (in particular its permissibility); local-project imperatives formulate a new action advancing a course of action in which the addressee is already actively engaged; global-project-imperatives target a next task for which the addressee is available on the grounds of their participation in the overall event, and in the absence of any competing work; and competitive imperatives draw on a presently otherwise engaged addressee on the grounds of their social commitment to the relevant course of actions. These four turn shapes are increasingly complex, reflecting the interactional work required to bridge the increasing distance between what the addressee is currently doing, and what the imperative mandates. We present data from German and Polish informal and institutional settings.
The main objective of this article is to describe the current activities at the Mannheim Institute for German Language regarding the implementation of a domain-specific ontology for German grammar. We differentiate ontology bases from ontology management Systems, point out the benefits of database-driven Solutions, and go Step by Step through all phases of the ontology lifecycle. In Order to demonstrate the practical use of our approach, we outline the interface between our ontology and the grammis web Information System, and compare the ontology-based retrieval mechanism with traditional full text search.