Refine
Year of publication
- 1999 (10) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (10) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (10)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (10)
Keywords
- Deutsch (5)
- Englisch (2)
- Verb (2)
- punctual verb (2)
- Argumentation (1)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Dominanz (1)
- Elektronische Publikation (1)
- Enzyklopädie (1)
- Geräuschverb (1)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
Publisher
This work exploited coarticulation and loud speech as natural sources of perturbation in order to determine whether articulatory covariation (motor equivalent behavior) can be observed inspeech that is not artificially perturbed. Articulatory analyses of jaw and tongue movement in the production of alveolar consonants by German speakers were performed. The sibilant /s/ shows virtually no articulatory covariation under the influence of natural perturbations, whereas other alveolar consonants show more obvious compensatory behavior. Our conclusion is that an effect of natural sources of perturbation is noticable, but sounds are affected to different degrees.
Das Konzept von Dominanz bezieht sich auf soziale Beziehungen, die entweder auf bereits etablierten Machtverhältnissen basieren oder solche herzustellen versuchen. Dominanz im Gespräch kann sich in bestimmten Interaktionseigenschaften manifestieren, z.B. in der ständigen Beanspruchung von Rederecht, der konsistenten thematischen und perspektivischen Steuerung, der Kontrolle von Partneraktivitäten oder dem Verhindern von Initiativen anderer u.ä..
Im Folgenden werde ich mich auf eine der Möglichkeiten konzentrieren, auf das Herstellen von Dominanz durch das Dominantsetzen von Perspektiven. Durch das konsistente Dominantsetzen der eigenen Perspektive auf einen thematischen Gegenstand oder Aspekte davon ist es möglich, zumindest in Bezug auf diesen Gegenstand Dominanz über die anderen Gesprächspartner zu etablieren.
Lexical-semantic theories often suffer from the imprecision of the concepts they employ in their representations. This leads to a considerable decrease in empirical strength by inviting circular argumentation. A demonstration of how to go about overcoming such shortcomings will be carried out, using the lexical semantic concept of "punctuality" as an example. Firstly, I will argue that the distinction between punctuality and durativity plays a crucial role for the explanation of a wide range of syntactic and semantic phenomena. Secondly, I will discuss methodological issues involved in arriving at a more precise definition of punctuality and, finally, the notion of "punctuality" will be given an interpretation on the basis of extensive consultation of research on cognitive time concepts.
In this study we investigate the intonational characteristics of the four utterance types statement, wh-question, yes/no-question and declarative question. Readings of two German scripted dialogues were examined to ascertain characteristic features of the F0 contour for each utterance type. Final boundary tone, nuclear pitch accent, F0 offset, F0 onset, F0 range, and the slopes of a topline and a bottomline were determined for each utterance and compared for the four utterance types. Results show that for an average speaker, the final boundary tone, the F0 range, and the slope of the topline can be used to distinguish between the four utterance types. However, speakers may deviate from this pattern and exploit other intonational means to distinguish certain utterance types or choose not to mark a syntactic difference at all.
Whether verbs have to be marked as punctual vs. durative has been a controversial issue from the very beginnings of research on aktionsarten in the last century right on up to modern theories of aspectual classes and aspect composition. Debates about the linguistic necessity of this distinction have often been accompanied by the question of what it means for a verb to be temporally punctual. In this paper I will, firstly, sketch the history of research on the punctual-durative distinction and present several linguistic arguments in its favor. Secondly, I will show how this distinction is captured in an eventstructure- based approach to lexical semantics. Thirdly, I will discuss the extent to which a precise definition of the notions used in lexical
representations helps avoid circular argumentation in lexical semantics. Finally, I will demonstrate how this can be done for the notion of ‘punctuality’ by clarifying the logical type of this predicate and relating it to central cognitive time concepts.