Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (61)
- Part of a Book (49)
- Book (20)
- Part of Periodical (5)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (69)
- German (67)
- Multiple languages (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (137) (remove)
Keywords
- Konversationsanalyse (137) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (60)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (38)
- Postprint (26)
- Ahead of Print (2)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (16)
- Benjamins (12)
- de Gruyter (12)
- Narr Francke Attempto (9)
- Winter (9)
- Taylor & Francis (7)
- Cambridge University Press (6)
- Stauffenburg (5)
- Frontiers Media SA (4)
- IDS-Verlag (4)
Kultur ist nicht nur zu einem Schlüsselbegriff der Geisteswissenschaften geworden, sondern wird auch entterminologisiert als Alltagsbegriff benutzt. In diesem Beitrag wird untersucht, wie der Ausdruck Kultur (einschließlich Derivationen und Komposita) in der mündlichen Interaktion verwendet wird. Auf Basis von 82 Instanzen im Korpus FOLK des IDS Mannheim wurde festgestellt, dass der Ausdruck von SprecherInnen in zumeist semiformellen bis formellen Interaktionstypen benutzt wird. Es findet sich ein breites Spektrum unterschiedlicher, teils ineinander übergehender Bedeutungen, welches dem der wissenschaftlichen Literatur der Kulturtheorie ähnlich ist. Dabei lassen sich jeweils relevante Kernbedeutungen identifizieren, mit denen mehr oder weniger vage assoziierte Bedeutungen verbunden sind. Kultur zeigt sich als kontroverser Begriff: Die Referenz von Kultur, die Wertung und seine Relevanz als Erklärungsressource sind häufig umstritten.
This manual introduces a conversation analytically informed coding scheme for episodes involving the direct social sanctioning of problem behavior in informal social interaction which was developed in the project Norms, Rules, and Morality across Languages (NoRM-aL) at the Leibniz-Institute for the German Language. It outlines the background for its development, delimits the phenomena to which the coding scheme can be applied and provides instructions for its use.
The scheme asks for basic information about the recording and the participants involved in the episode, before taking stock of different features of the sanctioning episode as a whole. This is followed by sets of specific coding questions about the sanctioning move itself (such as its timing and composition) and the reaction it engenders. The coding enables researchers to get a bird’s eye view on recurrent features of such episodes in larger quantities of data and allows for comparisons across different languages and informal settings.
Modalverben gehören zu den hochfrequenten Verben des Deutschen und weisen in der gesprochenen Sprache eine hohe grammatische, semantische und funktionale Flexibilität auf. Die Studie befasst sich aus interaktionslinguistischer Sicht mit dem Verwendungsspektrum von Konstruktionen, in denen Modalverben “absolut”, das heißt hier: ohne infinites Vollverb, gebraucht werden. Es wird untersucht, welche Bedeutungen die Modalverben in Interaktionen haben bzw. welche Faktoren ihre Interpretation beeinflussen und inwiefern die jeweiligen Konstruktionen für spezifische sprachliche Handlungen und in speziellen interaktiven Kontexten verwendet werden.
Als entscheidend für die Analyse zeigen sich neben der signifikanten Medialitätsdifferenz auch Interaktivität, Online-Produktion und Gattungs- bzw. Registermerkmale wie Informalität. Die Studie demonstriert außerdem, dass die Modalverbkonstruktionen sehr unterschiedliche Grade von Schematizität, Spezifizität und (Nicht-) Kompositionalität aufweisen.
Bringing together a team of global experts, this is the first volume to focus on the ways in which meanings are ascribed to actions in social interaction. It builds on the research traditions of Conversation Analysis and Pragmatics, and highlights the role of interactional, social, linguistic, multimodal, and epistemic factors in the formation and ascription of action-meanings. It shows how inference and intention ascription are displayed and drawn upon by participants in social interaction. Each chapter reveals practices, processes, and uses of action ascription, based on the analysis of audio and video recordings from nine different languages. Action ascription is conceptualised in this volume as not merely a cognitive process, but a social action in its own right that is used for managing interactional concerns and guiding the subsequent course of social interaction. It will be essential reading for academic researchers and advanced students interested in the relationship between language, behaviour and social interaction.
Action ascription can be understood from two broad perspectives. On one view, it refers to the ways in which actions constitute categories by which members make sense of their world, and forms a key foundation for holding others accountable for their conduct. On another view, it refers to the ways in which we accountably respond to the actions of others, thereby accomplishing sequential versions of meaningful social experience. In short, action ascription can be understood as matter of categorisation of prior actions or responding in ways that are sequentially fitted to prior actions, or both. In this chapter, we review different theoretical approaches to action ascription that have developed in the field, as well as the key constituents and resources of action ascription that have been identified in conversation analytic research, before going on to discuss how action ascription can itself be considered a form of social action.
Analepses with topic-drop are frequent structures in German interaction. While hitherto the focus on analepses was a rather syntactic one, this paper deals with analeptic structures from a semantic perspective. It particularly concentrates on the semantic relations between the referents of the analepses and the prior interactional context. This analysis shows that even for rather simple analepses which just omit a constituent from the prior utterance, conceptual processes are more decisive for its interpretation than syntactic features of the antecedent constituents. This is even more the case for complex analepses that are only indirectly linked to the prior context, and for the interpretation of which hearers need to draw inferences. The paper argues that theoretical approaches like Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics can profit from adopting a semantic and conceptual perspective for the interpretation of interactional structures.