Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (196) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (196) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (196)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (52)
- Deutsch (47)
- Wörterbuch (31)
- Nationalsozialismus (23)
- Neologismus (22)
- Lexikografie (21)
- COVID-19 (20)
- Kommunikation (19)
- Lexikographie (16)
- Sprachgebrauch (16)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (133)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (60)
- Postprint (24)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (108)
- Peer-Review (89)
Publisher
- IDS-Verlag (73)
- de Gruyter (52)
- V&R unipress (16)
- Wilhelm Fink (14)
- Peter Lang (6)
- Ids-Verlag (5)
- Cambridge University Press (3)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (3)
- Benjamins (2)
- Bloomsbury Academic (1)
This paper focusss on the first Slavonic-Romanian lexicons, compiled in the second half of the 17th century and their use(rs), proposing a method of investigating the manner in which lexical information available in the above corpus relates, if at all, to the vocabulary of texts from the same period. We chose to investigate their relation to an anonymous Old Testament translation made from Church Slavonic, also from the second half of the 17th century, which was supposed to be produced in the same geographical area, in the same Church Slavonic school or even by the same author as the lexicons. After applying a lemmatizer on both the Biblical text (Books of Genesis and Daniel) and the Romanian material from the lexicons, we analyse the results and double the statistical analysis with a series of case studies, focusing on some common lexemes that might be an indicator of the relatedness of the texts. Even if the analysis points out that the lexicons might not have been compiled as a tool for the translation of religious texts, it proves to be a useful method that reveals interesting data and provides the basis for more extensive approaches.
In diesem Kapitel stellen wir zunächst grundlegende Konzepte von Abfragesystemen und Abfragesprachen für die Suche in Korpora vor. Diese Konzepte sollen Ihnen helfen, die einzelnen Abfragesprachen besser zu verstehen und vergleichen zu können. Die gängigen Abfragesprachen unterscheiden sich in vielen Details. Diese Details und die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der einzelnen Abfragesprachen stellen wir im zweiten Teil mit vielen Beispielaufgaben und dazu passenden Lösungen in jeweils drei Abfragesprachen vor.
Action ascription can be understood from two broad perspectives. On one view, it refers to the ways in which actions constitute categories by which members make sense of their world, and forms a key foundation for holding others accountable for their conduct. On another view, it refers to the ways in which we accountably respond to the actions of others, thereby accomplishing sequential versions of meaningful social experience. In short, action ascription can be understood as matter of categorisation of prior actions or responding in ways that are sequentially fitted to prior actions, or both. In this chapter, we review different theoretical approaches to action ascription that have developed in the field, as well as the key constituents and resources of action ascription that have been identified in conversation analytic research, before going on to discuss how action ascription can itself be considered a form of social action.
Eine korpuslinguistische Untersuchung mit umfassender Analyse der häufiger vorkommenenden Adverbbildungsmuster des Deutschen legt nahe, dass die Sättigung des internen Argumentplatzes eines ursprünglich relationalen Ausdrucks eine wichtige Rolle bei der Adverbproduktion spielt (Brandt 2020). Eine genauere Betrachtung der Unterschiede zwischen -ermaßen- vs. -erweise-Adverbien deutet auf eine grammatische Unterscheidung zwischen Satzadverbien und Adverbien der Art und Weise: Im Fall von -ermaßen erfolgt die Sättigung über Token-Reflexivität, während der interne Slot von -erweise- Bildungen über häufigere und möglicherweise expansive Mechanismen geschlossen wird. Darüber hinaus fördert die pleonastische Qualität von Bildungen auf der Basis gerundivaler Partizipien die Produktivität von -erweise Adverbien.
The paper presents the process of developing the AirFrame database, a specialized lexical resource in which aviation terminology is defined in the form of semantic frames, following the methodology of the Berkeley FrameNet (FN). First, the structure of the database is presented, and then the methodology applied in developing and populating the database is described. The link between specialized aviation frames and general language semantic frames, of which frames defining entities, processes, attributes and events are particularly relevant, is discussed on the example of the semantic frame of Flight and its related frames. The paper ends with discussing possibilities of using AirFrame as a model for further developing resources in which general and specialized knowledge are linked.
Almanca tuhfe / Deutsches Geschenk (1916) oder: Wie schreibt man deutsch mit arabischen Buchstaben?
(2022)
Versified dictionaries are bilingual/multilingual glossaries written in verse form to teach essential words in any foreign language. In Islamic culture, versified dictionaries were produced to teach the Arabic language to the young generations of Muslim communities not native in Arabic. In the course of time, many bilingual/multilingual versified dictionaries were written in different languages throughout the Islamic world. The focus of this study is on the Turkish-German versified dictionary titled Almanca Tuhfe / Deutsches Geschenk [German Gift], published by Dr. Sherefeddin Pasha in Istanbul in 1916. This dictionary is the only dictionary in verse ever written combining these two languages. Moreover the dictionary is one of the few texts containing German words written in Arabic letters (applying Ottoman spelling conventions). The study concentrates on the way German words are spelled and tries to find out, whether Sherefeddin Pasha applied something like fixed rules to write the German lexemes.
Wortgeschichte digital (Digital Word History) is an emerging historical dictionary of the German language that focuses on describing semantic shifts from about 1600 through today. This article provides deeper insight into the dictionary’s “cross-reference clusters,” one of its software tools that performs visualization of its reference network. Hence, the clusters are a part of the project’s macrostructure. They serve as both a means for users to find entries of interest and a tool to elucidate relations among dictionary entries. Rather than delve into technical aspects, this article focuses on the applied logics of the software and discusses the approach in light of the dictionary’s microstructure. The article concludes with some considerations about the clusters’ advantages and limitations.
Der nationalsozialistische Interaktions- und Kommunikationsraum war mithin bevölkert von kommunikativ konstruierten Sozialfiguren. Hierbei gab es sowohl positiv Konnotierte (z. B. Volksgenosse, Nationalsozialist, Parteigenosse, SA-Mann, Alter Kämpfer) als auch negativ Konnotierte (z. B. Asozialer, Judenfreund, Schwarzer, Roter, Freimaurer). Diese stereotypisierten Sozialfiguren, an die wiederum vielfältige positive wie negative Attribuierungen geknüpft waren, stellten gleichsam Diskurspositionen dar, die anderen zugewiesen wurden oder eingenommen werden konnten – sofern den individuellen Voraussetzungen nach möglich – und die mit unterschiedlichen Graden der In- bzw. Exklusion einhergingen. Die folgenden Ausführungen konzentrieren sich auf zwei dieser Figuren, die spezifischer als Grenzfiguren begriffen werden können: Meckerer und Märzgefallene. Es wird untersucht, wie diese beiden Grenzfiguren sprachlich konstruiert, in welchen Kontexten und Kommunikationssituationen sie angeeignet und verwendet wurden. In beiden Fällen wird der Fokus dabei über den wörtlichen Ausdruck hinaus auf zeitgenössisch ähnliche oder eng verwandte Bezeichnungen ausgeweitet.
The paper presents the results of a survey on lexicographic practices and lexicographers’ needs across Europe that was conducted in the context of the Horizon 2020 project European Lexicographic Infrastructure (ELEXIS) among the observer institutions of the project. The survey is a revised and upgraded version of the survey which was originally conducted among ELEXIS lexicographic partner institutions in 2018 (Kallas et al. 2019a). The main goal of this new survey was to complement the data from the ELEXIS lexicographic partner institutions in order to get a more complete picture of lexicographic practices both for born-digital and retro-digitised resources in Europe. The results offer a detailed insight into many aspects of the lexicographic process at European institutions, such as funding, training, staff, lexicographic expertise, software and tools. In addition, the survey reflects on current trends in lexicography and reveals what institutions see as the most important emerging trends that will affect lexicography in the short-term and long-term future. Overall, the results provide valuable input informing the development of tools, resources, guidelines and training materials within ELEXIS.
This paper discusses an investigation of how senses are ordered across eight dictionaries. A dataset of 75 words was used for this purpose, and two senses were examined for each word. The words are divided into three groups of 25 words each according to the relationship between the senses: Homonymy, Metaphor, and Systematic Polysemy. The primary finding is that WordNet differs from the other dictionaries in terms of Metaphor. The order of the senses was more often figurative/literal, and it had the highest percentage of figurative senses that were not found. We discuss leveraging another dictionary, COBUILD, to re-order the senses according to frequency.