Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (74)
- Article (32)
- Other (26)
- Conference Proceeding (19)
- Book (12)
Language
- German (138)
- English (22)
- Multiple languages (2)
- Chinese (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (33)
- Sprachpolitik (21)
- Computerlinguistik (18)
- Dependenzgrammatik (16)
- Syntax (16)
- Digitalisierung (15)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (12)
- Sprache (12)
- Sprachwandel (12)
- Texttechnologie (10)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (72)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (51)
- Postprint (13)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
Multimedia
(1997)
Uncertain about Uncertainty: Different ways of processing fuzziness in digital humanities data
(2014)
The GeoBib project is constructing a georeferenced online bibliography of early Holocaust and camp literature published between 1933 and 1949 (Entrup et al. 2013a). Our immediate objectives include identifying the texts of interest in the first place, composing abstracts for them, researching their history, and annotating relevant places and times. Relations between persons, texts, and places will be visualized using digital maps and GIS software as an integral part of the resulting GeoBib information portal. The combination of diverse data from varying sources not only enriches our knowledge of these otherwise mostly forgotten texts; it also confronts us with vague, uncertain or even conflicting information. This situation yields challenges for all researchers involved – historians, literary scholars, geographers and computer scientists alike. While the project operates at the intersection of historical and literary studies, the involved computer scientists are in charge of providing a working environment (Entrup et al. 2013b) and processing the collected information in a way that is formalized yet capable of dealing with inevitable vagueness, uncertainty and contradictions. In this paper we focus on the problems and opportunities of encoding and processing fuzzy data.
Editorial
(2011)
In the project SemDok (Generic document structures in linearly organised texts) funded by the German Research Foundation DFG, a discourse parser for a complex type (scientific articles by example), is being developed. Discourse parsing (henceforth DP) according to the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) (Mann and Taboada, 2005; Marcu, 2000) deals with automatically assigning a text a tree structure in which discourse segments and rhetorical relations between them are marked, such as Concession. For identifying the combinable segments, declarative rules are employed, which describe linguistic and structural cues and constraints about possible combinations by referring to different XML annotation layers of the input text, and external knowledge bases such as a discourse marker lexicon, a lexico-semantic ontology (later to be combined with a domain ontology), and an ontology of rhetorical relations. In our text-technological environment, the obvious choice of formalism to represent such ontologies is OWL (Smith et al., 2004). In this paper, we describe two OWL ontologies and how they are consulted from the discourse parser to solve certain tasks within DP. The first ontology is a taxononomy of rhetorical relations which was developed in the project. The second one is an OWL version of GermaNet, the model of which we designed together with our project partners.
This study examines what kind of cues and constraints for discourse interpretation can be derived from the logical and generic document structure of complex texts by the example of scientific journal articles. We performed statistical analysis on a corpus of scientific articles annotated on different annotations layers within the framework of XML-based multi-layer annotation. We introduce different discourse segment types that constrain the textual domains in which to identify rhetorical relation spans, and we show how a canonical sequence of text type structure categories is derived from the corpus annotations. Finally, we demonstrate how and which text type structure categories assigned to complex discourse segments of the type “block” statistically constrain the occurrence of rhetorical relation types.
Vor dem Hintergrund einer neuen linguistischen Betrachtungsweise, die wissenschaftliche Präsentationen als eine eigenständige, komplexe, multimodale Textsorte auffasst, wird in diesem Beitrag zunächst der Aspekt der Multimodalität von Präsentationen fokussiert. Die analytische Beschäftigung mit wissenschaftlichen Präsentationen wird dann um erste Ergebnisse unserer Rezeptionsexperimente ergänzt, in denen unter anderem Erhebungen zur Wissensvermittlung unterschiedlicher wissenschaftlicher Präsentationen durchgeführt wurden.
In multimodal scholarly presentations supported by presentation software, spoken and written language, various visualizations on the projected slides as well as the contributors’ gestures and facial expressions build a meaningful oneness. On the one hand, communication scientists as well as linguists have for a relatively long time neglected the presentation as a complex form of communication. On the other hand, since Tafte (2003 ), columnists of major German newspapers have been dealing with the question of the value, the quality and the place of PowerPoint in science, they have even tried to find the answer to the question whether PowerPoint is evil or not.
The presentation practice is perceived as fundamentally deficient of systematic empirical research on presentations. Also Grabowski called attention to this desideratum with two critical articles (Grabowski 2003, 2008). Various questions - still unanswered - have motivated the implementation of a number of experiments (in the summer of 2010) for analyzing the knowledge and learning effects and the communicational impact of scientific presentations. The general aim of these experiments was to conduct empirical research on selected presentations in order to find out what kind of presentation is successful. The main interest is to find out which model of scholarly presentation produces the best results regarding learning effect and communicative impact.
In der Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft hat das Lexikon in unterschiedlichem Maße Aufmerksamkeit erfahren. In jüngerer Zeit ist es vor allem durch die Verfügbarkeit sprachlicher Massendaten und die Entwicklung von Methoden zu ihrer Analyse wieder stärker ins Zentrum des Interesses gerückt. Dies hat aber nicht nur unseren Blick für lexikalische Phänomene geschärft, sondern hat gegenwärtig auch einen profunden Einfluss auf die Entstehung neuer Sprachtheorien, beginnend bei Fragen nach der Natur lexikalischen Wissens bis hin zur Auflösung der Lexikon-Grammatik-Dichotomie. Das Institut für Deutsche Sprache hat diese Entwicklungen zum Anlass genommen, sein aktuelles Jahrbuch in Anknüpfung an die Jahrestagung 2017 – „Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität“ – der Theorie des Lexikons und den Methoden seiner Erforschung zu widmen.