Refine
Year of publication
- 2024 (2)
- 2023 (20)
- 2022 (17)
- 2021 (35)
- 2020 (41)
- 2019 (67)
- 2018 (50)
- 2017 (12)
- 2016 (3)
- 2015 (1)
- 2014 (11)
- 2013 (10)
- 2012 (9)
- 2011 (6)
- 2010 (4)
- 2009 (10)
- 2008 (4)
- 2007 (5)
- 2005 (1)
- 2004 (1)
- 2003 (3)
- 2002 (5)
- 2001 (1)
- 2000 (2)
- 1998 (3)
- 1997 (6)
- 1996 (4)
- 1995 (4)
- 1994 (3)
- 1993 (1)
- 1992 (1)
- 1991 (7)
- 1990 (2)
- 1989 (5)
- 1988 (3)
- 1987 (2)
- 1986 (1)
- 1985 (2)
- 1984 (5)
- 1983 (2)
- 1981 (1)
- 1979 (2)
- 1978 (1)
- 1977 (4)
- 1976 (5)
- 1975 (4)
- 1974 (1)
- 1973 (1)
- 1972 (1)
- 1970 (8)
- 1969 (6)
- 1968 (6)
Document Type
- Article (292)
- Conference Proceeding (49)
- Part of a Book (34)
- Review (26)
- Report (9)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Language
- German (271)
- English (135)
- French (4)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (157)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (53)
- Rezension (39)
- Wörterbuch (31)
- Gesprochene Sprache (28)
- Kongressbericht (27)
- Rechtschreibung (27)
- Konversationsanalyse (26)
- Computerlinguistik (24)
- Interaktion (22)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (411) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (411) (remove)
Publisher
- Erich Schmidt (57)
- de Gruyter (51)
- Erich Schmidt Verlag (19)
- Bibliographisches Institut (16)
- European Language Resources Association (16)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (12)
- Springer (9)
- Steiner (9)
- Benjamins (8)
- Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache (GfdS) (7)
Meaning in interaction
(2024)
This editorial to the Special Issue on “Meaning in Interaction” introduces to the approach of Interactional Semantics, which has been developed over the last years within the framework of Interactional Linguistics. It discusses how “meaning” is understood and approached in this framework and lays out that Interactional Semantics is interested in how participants clarify and negotiate the meanings of the expressions that they are using in social interaction. Commonalities and differences of this approach with other approaches to meaning are flagged, and the intellectual origins and precursors of Interactional Semantics are introduced. The contributions to the Special Issue are located in the larger field of research.
In this contribution we analyse how mobile device users in face-to-face communication jointly negotiate the boundaries and action spaces between digital and non-digital, shared and individual, public and private. Instead of conceptualising digital and face-to-face, i. e., non-digital, communication as separate, more recent research emphasises that social practices relying on mobile devices increasingly connect physical and virtual communicative spaces. Using multimodal conversation analysis, we investigate the situated use of mobile devices and media in social interaction. Excerpts from videotaped everyday conversations illustrate how participants frame their smartphone use in the presence of others, such as when looking at digital pictures, or when recording voice messages. A detailed analysis of verbal and embodied conduct shows how participants negotiate and interpret the connection or separation of digital and non-digital activities and possible forms of participation within these. (Digital) publicness or privacy are therefore to be understood as an interactive accomplishment.
OWID und OWIDplus – lexikographisch-lexikologische Online-Informationssysteme des IDS Mannheim
(2023)
Lexikographische und lexikalische Ressourcen zum Deutschen werden an vielen unterschiedlichen Institutionen erarbeitet, z. B. an Akademien der Wissenschaften oder in privatwirtschaftlichen Verlagen. Auch am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) in Mannheim werden solche Materialien erstellt und der (Fach-)Öffentlichkeit unter dem Dach von OWID, dem „Online-Wortschatz-Informationssystem Deutsch“ (owid.de), präsentiert.
Wissenschaftskommunikation gehört auch in den Sprachwissenschaften inzwischen zu den regelmäßigen Aufgaben neben Forschung und Lehre. Die Aktivitäten reichen von "kleineren Formaten" wie TikTok-Videos zu linguistischen Themen bis zum Aufbau des "Forum Deutsche Sprache" durch das IDS Mannheim als eine Art "Museum für Sprachwissenschaft". Im Rahmen des Uni.Stadt.Fests 2019, einer ganztägigen Veranstaltung anlässlich des 50jährigen Jubiläums der Universität Bielefeld, haben wir – Gesprächsforschende der Universität – die Gesprächsanalyse an einem Stand als Forschungsmethode erlebbar gemacht: in einem sogenannten "Plauderlabor". Die Idee zu diesem Projekt basiert auf dem "Conversational Rollercoaster" von Albert et al. (2018), einem partizipatorischen Format zur Demonstration der konversationsanalytischen Methode, entwickelt für eine Wissenschaftsmesse in London 2016. Zur Vorbereitung des Plauderlabors organisierte sich in Bielefeld eine interdisziplinäre Gruppe mit den Lehrstuhlinhaberinnen Ruth Ayaß (Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung mit dem Schwerpunkt qualitative Methoden, Fakultät für Soziologie), Barbara Job (Sprache und Kommunikation, Fakultät für Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft) und Friederike Kern (Germanistik/Frühe sprachliche Bildung und frühes Lernen, Fakultät für Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft) sowie ca. 30 wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeiter*innen, Doktorand*innen und studentischen Hilfskräften, teils aus dem Zentrum für Lehren und Lernen (ZLL) und der Bielefeld School of Education (BiSEd). Unsere Erfahrungen mit dem Plauderlabor wollen wir im Folgenden teilen.
There are strict formal requirements for the use of a comma. However, there are none regarding the comma’s actual shape. In printed fonts, it is determined by the font’s specification. In hand-written texts though, the shape of the comma is variable; most writers choose from a set of straight, convex and concave shapes. By using a corpus of 1464 commas written by 99 individuals, we will present three case studies of persons whose comma shapes do somehow correlate with linguistic structures. With that, we might identify a few (possibly subconscious) shaping strategies. Some writers might mark a norm insecurity by a different comma form, others might mark the function of the entity which is segmented by the comma, or the comma type itself (sentence boundary, exposition or coordination).
This paper discusses contemporary societal roles of German in the Baltic states (Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania). Speaker and learner statistics and a summary of sociolinguistic research (Linguistic Landscapes, language learning motivation, language policies, international roles of languages) suggest that German has by far fewer speakers and functions than the national languages, English, and Russian, and it is not a dominant language in the contemporary Baltics anymore. However, German is ahead of ‘any other language’ in terms of users and societal roles as a frequent language in education, of economic relations, as a historical lingua franca, and a language of traditional and new minorities. Highly diverse groups of users and language policy actors form a ‘coalition of interested parties’ which creates niches which guarantee German a frequent use. In the light of the abundance of its functions, the paper suggests the concept ‘additional language of society’ for a variety such as German in the Baltics – since there seems to be no adequate alternative labelling which would do justice to all societal roles. The paper argues that this concept may also be used for languages in similar societal situations and, not least, be useful in language marketing and the promotion of multilingualism.
Historische Werkzeugnisse. Reflexive Medienpraktiken in Kriegsgefangenenakten des Zweiten Weltkriegs
(2023)
Im US-Kriegsgefangenenlager Fort Hunt wurden während des Zweiten Weltkriegs deutsche Soldaten verhört und abgehört, was in Protokollen dokumentiert wurde. Die praxeologische Herausforderung besteht darin, Praktiken anhand dieses Materials adäquat zu analysieren. Dass wir Spuren in Archivdaten verstehen, ist in ihrer Semiotizität begründet. Dass sie die sie hervorbringenden Situationen überdauern, verdanken wir ihrer Medialität. In einer semiopraxeologischen Analyse, die diese beiden Grundkonstanten zeichenvermittelter Kommunikation in Beziehung zueinander setzt, wird erörtert, wie Praktiken sich aus ihren Spuren erschließen. Es wird gezeigt, wie sich an Dokumenten indexikalische und reflexive Verweise auf die heterogenen, praktischen Verwendungszusammenhänge über die Zeit manifestieren. Entsprechend sind Archivdokumente als historische Werkzeugnisse aufzufassen, die einerseits Vergangenes belegen und die andererseits praktisch gehandhabt werden, was wiederum neue Praxisindizes erzeugt und als Spuren am Material hinterlässt. Die Analyse zeigt, inwiefern Wissen nicht trotz, sondern aufgrund seiner semiotischen und materialen Manifestationen in (Archiv-)Dokumenten vorläufig ist und sich als Gegenstand weiterer Praktiken immer wieder verändern kann.
The internationally renowned conference of the European Association for Lexicography (EURALEX) has taken place every two years for the past 39 years. Last year’s conference, held July 12th–16th, 2022, marked EURALEX’s 20th edition, and more than 200 international participants gathered at Mannheim Palace to discuss current developments, learn about new projects, and present their own work — either in lexicography or in one of the many applied or neighboring disciplines such as corpus and computational linguistics.
This replication study aims to investigate a potential bias toward addition in the German language, building upon previous findings of Winter and colleagues who identified a similar bias in English. Our results confirm a bias in word frequencies and binomial expressions, aligning with these previous findings. However, the analysis of distributional semantics based on word vectors did not yield consistent results for German. Furthermore, our study emphasizes the crucial role of selecting appropriate translational equivalents, highlighting the significance of considering language-specific factors when testing for such biases for languages other than English.
What is the subject of German linguistics? This seemingly simple question has no obvious answer. In the ZGL’s first issue, the editors required contributions to cover the whole of the German language and to be theoretically sound but application-orientated, whereas the current ZGL-homepage defines the German language of present and history in all its differentiations as its subject matter.
Looking through the fifty volumes of ZGL, three relationships can be identified as presumably enlightening the role of language, in particular the German language: language and mind; language and language use; language and culture. Though of a different systematic type, language and data should be added as an increasingly important pairing for conceptualizing language. On this basis, I also discuss the position of linguistic studies of the German language, mirrored in the ZGL-volumes, between social, cultural and natural sciences, as well as the corresponding epistemic approaches – like explaining vs. understanding.