Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (103)
- Part of a Book (14)
- Part of Periodical (7)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- English (80)
- German (37)
- French (10)
- Multiple languages (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (129) (remove)
Keywords
- Konversationsanalyse (129) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (84)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (26)
- Postprint (24)
- Ahead of Print (2)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (129) (remove)
Publisher
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (15)
- Taylor & Francis (14)
- Benjamins (10)
- Elsevier (8)
- de Gruyter (8)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (7)
- Frontiers Media SA (4)
- Schmidt (4)
- Frontiers Media S.A. (3)
- IDS-Verlag (3)
Drawing on research from conversation analysis and developmental psychology, we point to the existence of “supporters” of morally responsible agency in everyday interaction: causes of our behavior that we are often unaware of, but that would make goodenough reasons for our actions, were we made aware of them.
The present paper explores how rules are enforced and talked about in everyday life. Drawing on a corpus of board game recordings across European languages, we identify a sequential and praxeological context for rule talk. After a game rule is breached, a participant enforces proper play and then formulates a rule with an impersonal deontic statement (e.g. “It’s not allowed to do this”). Impersonal deontic statements express what may or may not be done without tying the obligation to a particular individual. Our analysis shows that such statements are used as part of multi-unit and multi-modal turns where rule talk is accomplished through both grammatical and embodied means. Impersonal deontic statements serve multiple interactional goals: they account for having changed another’s behavior in the moment and at the same time impart knowledge for the future. We refer to this complex action as an “instruction.” The results of this study advance our understanding of rules and rule-following in everyday life, and of how resources of language and the body are combined to enforce and formulate rules.
We examine moments in social interaction in which a person formulates what another thinks or believes. Such formulations of belief constitute a practice with specifiable contexts and consequences. Belief formulations treat aspects of the other person's prior conduct as accountable on the basis that it provided a new angle on a topic, or otherwise made a surprising contribution within an ongoing course of actions. The practice of belief formulations subjectivizes the content that the other articulated and thereby topicalizes it, mobilizing commitment to that position, an account, or further elaboration. We describe how the practice can be put to work in different activity contexts: sometimes it is designed to undermine the other's position as a subjective 'mere belief', at other times it serves to mobilize further topic talk. Throughout, belief formulations show themselves to be a method by which we get to know ourselves and each other as mental agents.
Linguistic relativists have traditionally asked 'how language influences thought', but conversation analysts and anthropological linguists have moved the focus from thought to social action. We argue that 'social action' should in this context not become simply a new dependent variable, because the formulation 'does language influence action' suggests that social action would already be meaningfully constituted prior to its local (verbal and multi-modal) accomplishment. We draw on work by the gestalt psychologist Karl Duncker to show that close attention to action-in-a-situation helps us ground empirical work on cross-cultural diversity in an appreciation of the invariances that make culture-specific elements of practice meaningful.
This article makes an empirical and a methodological contribution to the comparative study of action. The empirical contribution is a comparative study of three distinct types of action regularly accomplished with the turn format du meinst x (“you mean/think x”) in German: candidate understandings, formulations of the other’s mind, and requests for a judgment. These empirical materials are the basis for a methodological exploration of different levels of researcher abstraction in the comparative study of action. Two levels are examined: the (coarser) level of conditionally relevant responses (what a response speaker must do to align with the action of the prior turn) and the (finer) level of “full alignment” (what a response speaker can do to align with the action of a prior turn). Both levels of abstraction provide empirically viable and analytically interesting descriptive concepts for the comparative study of action. Data are in German.
This article makes an empirical and a methodological contribution to the comparative study of action. The empirical contribution is a comparative study of three distinct types of action regularly accomplished with the turn format du meinst x (“you mean/think x”) in German: candidate understandings, formulations of the other’s mind, and requests for a judgment. These empirical materials are the basis for a methodological exploration of different levels of researcher abstraction in the comparative study of action. Two levels are examined: the (coarser) level of conditionally relevant responses (what a response speaker must do to align with the action of the prior turn) and the (finer) level of “full alignment” (what a response speaker can do to align with the action of a prior turn). Both levels of abstraction provide empirically viable and analytically interesting descriptive concepts for the comparative study of action. Data are in German.
Der Beitrag diskutiert - aus der Perspektive sozialer Welten - die Frage des Zusammenhangs zwischen den Deutungsmustern und Wissensbestanden, deren sich Migranten bedienen, und den Formen ihrer sozialen Teilhabe. Die empirische Analyse stützt sich auf „intra-ethnische“ Interaktionsprozesse in der sozialen Welt eines „türkischen“ Fußballvereins in Mannheim. Es wird gezeigt, dass sich im untersuchten Fall ethnische Selbstorganisation und Integration auf spezifische Weise paaren. Zu den Strukturmerkmalen dieser lokalen sozialen Welt zählen insbesondere ihre Einbettung in eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Kontexte und ihre interne Differenzierung. Des Weiteren ist die alltagspragmatische Verwendung "türkischer" Kulturmuster und der universalistische Charakter der symbolischen Legitimationen in der Alltagsphilosophie der Vereinsangehörigen zu nennen. Schließlich ist die Dominanz von Handlungsanforderungen und Deutungen aus der Fußballwelt gegenüber solchen aus dem „ethnischen“ Milieu sowie die Infragestellung der Kategorien „deutsch“ und „türkisch“ kennzeichnend für die untersuchte Sozialwelt.
Looking at gestures as a means for communication, they can serve conversational participants at several levels. As co-speech gestures, they can add information to the verbally expressed content and they can serve to manage turn-taking. In order to look closer at the interplay between these resources in face-to face conversation, we annotated hand gestures, syntactic completion points and the related turn-organisation, and measured the timing of gesture strokes and their lexical/phrasal referent. In a case study on German, we observe the trend that speakers vary less in gesturelexis on- and offsets when keeping the turn after syntactic completions than at speaker changes, backchannel or other locations of a conversation. This indicates that timing properties of non-verbal cues interact with verbal cues to manage turn-taking.
The human ability to anticipate upcoming behavior not only enables smooth turn transitions but also makes early responses possible, as respondents use a variety of cues that provide for early projection of the type of action that is being performed. This article examines resources for projection in interaction in three unrelated languages—Finnish, Japanese, and Mandarin—in sequences where speakers make evaluative assertions on a topic. The focus is on independently agreeing responses initiated in early overlap. Our cross-linguistic analysis reveals that while projection based on the ongoing turn-constructional unit relies on language-specific grammatical constructions, projection based on the larger context seems to be less language-dependent. A crucial finding is that in the target sequences, stances taken toward the topic already during earlier talk, as well as other structural patterns, are among the resources that recipients use for projecting how and when the ongoing turn will end.