Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (102) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (102) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (102)
Keywords
- Deutsch (48)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (26)
- Interaktion (13)
- Konversationsanalyse (11)
- Sprachgebrauch (10)
- Kommunikation (8)
- Wörterbuch (8)
- Lexikografie (7)
- Rechtschreibung (7)
- Multimodalität (6)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (73)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (26)
- Postprint (17)
- Ahead of Print (2)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (68)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (34)
Publisher
What is the subject of German linguistics? This seemingly simple question has no obvious answer. In the ZGL’s first issue, the editors required contributions to cover the whole of the German language and to be theoretically sound but application-orientated, whereas the current ZGL-homepage defines the German language of present and history in all its differentiations as its subject matter.
Looking through the fifty volumes of ZGL, three relationships can be identified as presumably enlightening the role of language, in particular the German language: language and mind; language and language use; language and culture. Though of a different systematic type, language and data should be added as an increasingly important pairing for conceptualizing language. On this basis, I also discuss the position of linguistic studies of the German language, mirrored in the ZGL-volumes, between social, cultural and natural sciences, as well as the corresponding epistemic approaches – like explaining vs. understanding.
A constructicon, i.e., a structured inventory of constructions, essentially aims at documenting functions of lexical and grammatical constructions. Among other parameters, so-called constructional collo-profiles, as introduced by Herbst (2018, 2020), are conclusive for determining constructional meanings. They provide information on how relevant individual words are for construction slots, they hint at usage preferences of constructions and serve as a helpful indicator for semantic peculiarities of constructions. However, even though collo-profiles constitute an indispensable component of constructicon entries, they pose major challengers for constructicographers: For a constructicographic enterprise it is not feasible to conduct collostructional analyses for hundreds or even thousands of constructions. In this article, we introduce a procedure based on the large language model BERT that allows to predict collo-profiles without having to extensively annotate instances of constructions in a given corpus. Specifically, by discussing the constructions X macht Y ADJP (‘x makes Y ADJ’, e.g. he drives him crazy) and N1 PREP N1 (e.g., bumper to bumper, constructions over constructions), we show how the developed automated system generates collo-profiles based on a limited number of annotated instances. Finally, we place collo-profiles alongside other dimensions of constructional meanings included in the German Constructicon.
Social media, as the fifth estate, increasingly influence public discourses and play a major role in shaping public opinion. Undoubtedly, they have the potential to promote participation and democracy. On the other side, they also constitute a risk for democratic societies, as the spread of hate speech and fake news has shown. As a response, forms of counterspeech organised by civil society have emerged in social media to counter the normalisation of hate speech and democracy-threatening discourses. In order to influence discourse in social media in terms of the fifth estate, counterspeech campaigns must be visible also quantitatively. In this ethnographic contrastive study, I analysed the activities of the German and Finnish Facebook groups of the network #iamhere international. The intensity and continuity of their activities is obviously influenced by their strategic organisation: conventionalised rules support them whereas lacking or inconsequent rules seemed to be counterproductive.
Das Ziel des Beitrages ist es, das Schweigen und seine sprachliche Gestaltung in Bezug auf die Makro- und Mikrostruktur des literarischen Textes zu erforschen. Den theoretischen Hintergrund bilden linguistische und literaturwissenschaftliche Arbeiten, die kommunikative, pragmatische, semantische, kulturelle sowie literaturhistorische Aspekte des Schweigens behandeln und seine Abgrenzung von der Stille hervorheben, die als Naturphänomen zu verstehen ist. Hingewiesen wird ausgehend vom Modell der literarischen Kommunikation auf die Rolle des Schweigens in der Triade Autor-Text-Leser sowie auf seine Realisierungsmöglichkeiten in der Struktur und Sprache des Erzähltextes. Dabei richtet sich die Aufmerksamkeit nicht nur auf das Schweigen als Nicht-Sprechen, sondern auch auf die nichtssagende Rede, die im Rahmen der Kommunikationssituation die Semantik des Schweigens aktualisiert. Die zwei gegensätzlichen Schweigeformen kommen in den Berliner Romanen von Robert Walser (1878-1956) zum Vorschein und unterliegen der genauen Analyse aus der Perspektive der Makro- und Mikrostilistik. Untersucht werden das Erzählprinzip der Geschwätzigkeit in Geschwister Tanner (1907), die Ironie in Der Gehülfe (1908) und die fragmentarische Erzählweise in Jakob von Gunten (1909), durch die das Schweigen sowohl auf der thematischen Ebene als auch in der Struktur und Sprache des Textes realisiert wird. Als narrative Strategie beeinflusst Schweigen die Form und den Inhalt Walsers Berliner Romane und erzielt somit die vom Autor gewünschte Wirkung auf den Leser.
We introduce DeReKoGram, a novel frequency dataset containing lemma and part-of-speech (POS) information for 1-, 2-, and 3-grams from the German Reference Corpus. The dataset contains information based on a corpus of 43.2 billion tokens and is divided into 16 parts based on 16 corpus folds. We describe how the dataset was created and structured. By evaluating the distribution over the 16 folds, we show that it is possible to work with a subset of the folds in many use cases (e.g., to save computational resources). In a case study, we investigate the growth of vocabulary (as well as the number of hapax legomena) as an increasing number of folds are included in the analysis. We cross-combine this with the various cleaning stages of the dataset. We also give some guidance in the form of Python, R, and Stata markdown scripts on how to work with the resource.
Neologisms, i.e., new words or meanings, are finding their way into everyday language use all the time. In the process, already existing elements of a language are recombined or linguistic material from other languages is borrowed. But are borrowed neologisms accepted similarly well by the speech community as neologisms that were formed from “native” material? We investigate this question based on neologisms in German. Building on the corresponding results of a corpus study, we test the hypothesis of whether “native” neologisms are more readily accepted than those borrowed from English. To do so, we use a psycholinguistic experimental paradigm that allows us to estimate the degree of uncertainty of the participants based on the mouse trajectories of their responses. Unexpectedly, our results suggest that the neologisms borrowed from English are accepted more frequently, more quickly, and more easily than the “native” ones. These effects, however, are restricted to people born after 1980, the so-called millenials. We propose potential explanations for this mismatch between corpus results and experimental data and argue, among other things, for a reinterpretation of previous corpus studies.
This replication study aims to investigate a potential bias toward addition in the German language, building upon previous findings of Winter and colleagues who identified a similar bias in English. Our results confirm a bias in word frequencies and binomial expressions, aligning with these previous findings. However, the analysis of distributional semantics based on word vectors did not yield consistent results for German. Furthermore, our study emphasizes the crucial role of selecting appropriate translational equivalents, highlighting the significance of considering language-specific factors when testing for such biases for languages other than English.
Der deutschen Muttersprachen
(2023)