Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (25) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (25)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (25) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (12)
- Konversationsanalyse (3)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (3)
- Rechtschreibung (3)
- Rezension (3)
- Computervermittelte Kommunikation (2)
- Englisch (2)
- Formale Semantik (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Neologismus (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (16)
- Postprint (6)
Reviewstate
- Peer-review (25) (remove)
Publisher
- Oxford University Press (2)
- iudicium (2)
- Brill (1)
- Budrich (1)
- ERCIM EEIG (1)
- Elsevier (1)
- Friedrich (1)
- Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache (1)
- Hempen (1)
- Langenscheidt (1)
Cybermobbing ist der gezielte Versuch, online das Face einer anderen Person zu dekonstruieren. Etwa ein Drittel aller Jugendlichen ist schon mindestens einmal mit diesem Problem konfrontiert worden. Seinen temporären Höhepunkt erreichte es mit dem Erscheinen der Internetseite Isharegossip.com (ISG). Diese entwickelte sich sehr schnell zu einer regelrechten Mobbing-Plattform. Täter fanden hier ganz besonders drastische verbale Mittel, um ihre Opfer zu kompromittieren. Bislang wurde noch nicht qualitativ analysiert, inwieweit Opfer und sogenannte virtuelle Zaungäste auf diese Verbalattacken reagieren. Ziel des Aufsatzes ist es, anhand eines typischen Diskurses sechs Verteidigungsstrategien aufzuzeigen, die von Opfern aber auch von sogenannten virtuellen Zaungästen angewandt werden, um das Face des Opfers zu rekonstruieren und zu stabilisieren.
Reformulating place
(2013)
This report examines what can be accomplished in conversation by reformulating a reference to a place using the practices of repair. It is based on an analysis of a collection of place references situated in second pair parts of adjacency pairs taken from a wide range of field recordings of talk-in-interaction. Not surprisingly, place references are sometimes reformulated so as to indicate a misspeaking or in pursuit of recipient recognition. At other times, however, we show that place references can be reformulated to more adequately implement the action of a turn in prosecuting the course of action of which it is a part. In these cases repairing a place reference can target a source of trouble associated with implementing the action of a turn at talk, and thus reformulating place can serve as a practical resource for accomplishing a range of interactional tasks. We conclude with a more complex case in which two reformulations are deployed in responding to a so-called ‘double-barrelled’ initiating action.
The article discusses the possibilities and challenges of combining conversation analysis and ethnography in the study of everyday family life. We argue that such a combination requires the decision whether to prioritise interaction data or ethno-graphic (in particular, interview) data in the analysis. We present a conversation analytic case study of how household work is commonly brought up in the interactions of one couple and bring this to bear on a re-analysis of a possible conflict situation originally described in the ethnographic analysis by Klein, Izquierdo, and Bradbury (2007), published in this journal. While the findings of the two analyses converge, they inform us about different dimensions of couple interaction. The ethnographic analysis is focused on participants’ experiences, and the conversation analysis is focused on participants’ practices. We conclude that the methodological decision to prioritise interaction or interview data has consequences for the kind of questions we can ask.