Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (126)
- Article (49)
- Book (11)
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Review (7)
- Other (2)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Sprachvariante (206) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (101)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (50)
- Postprint (5)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (118)
- Peer-Review (32)
- Verlags-Lektorat (5)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (2)
- Peer-review (2)
- Peer-Revied (1)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (71)
- De Gruyter (9)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (8)
- Narr (8)
- Narr Francke Attempto (7)
- Lang (5)
- Steiner (5)
- Schmidt (4)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (3)
- Winter (3)
Song lyrics can be considered as a text genre that has features of both written and spoken discourse, and potentially provides extensive linguistic and cultural information to scientists from various disciplines. However, pop songs play a rather subordinate role in empirical language research so far - most likely due to the absence of scientifically valid and sustainable resources. The present paper introduces a multiply annotated corpus of German lyrics as a publicly available basis for multidisciplinary research. The resource contains three types of data for the investigation and evaluation of quite distinct phenomena: TEI-compliant song lyrics as primary data, linguistically and literary motivated annotations, and extralinguistic metadata. It promotes empirically/statistically grounded analyses of genre-specific features, systemic-structural correlations and tendencies in the texts of contemporary pop music. The corpus has been stratified into thematic and author-specific archives; the paper presents some basic descriptive statistics, as well as the public online frontend with its built-in evaluation forms and live visualisations.
Ph@ttSessionz and Deutsch heute are two large German speech databases. They were created for different purposes: Ph@ttSessionz to test Internet-based recordings and to adapt speech recognizers to the voices of adolescent speakers, Deutsch heute to document regional variation of German. The databases differ in their recording technique, the selection of recording locations and speakers, elicitation mode, and data processing.
In this paper, we outline how the recordings were performed, how the data was processed and annotated, and how the two databases were imported into a single relational database system. We present acoustical measurements on the digit items of both databases. Our results confirm that the elicitation technique affects the speech produced, that f0 is quite comparable despite different recording procedures, and that large speech technology databases with suitable metadata may well be used for the analysis of regional variation of speech.
Besides English, Afrikaans is considered “the [Germanic] language which deviates grammatically the farthest from the others” (Harbert 2007: 17). But how exactly do we measure “grammatical deviation”, and how deviant is Afrikaans really if we compare it not just to other standard languages but also to non-standard varieties? The present contribution aims to address those questions combining functional-typological and dialectometric perspectives. We first select data for 28 Germanic varieties showing vastly different speaker numbers, grades of standardisation and amounts of language contact. Based on 48 (micro)typological variables from syntax, morphology and phonology, we perform cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling and present ways of visualizing and interpreting the results. Inter alia, the analyses show a major divide between Continental West Germanic and North Germanic (as might be expected) and they also identify a number of outliers, including English and pidgin and creole languages such as Russenorsk or Rabaul Creole German. Afrikaans appears to cluster with the other West Germanic languages rather than the outliers. Within West Germanic, however, it does indeed emerge as rather deviant and, according to our metric, it is, for example, typologically closer to other high-contact varieties such as Yiddish than it is to Dutch.
In diesem Beitrag werden neue, repräsentative Daten zur arealen Variation in Deutschland vorgestellt, die das Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache im Rahmen der Innovationsstichprobe des Sozio-ökonomischen Panels (SOEP) des Deutschen Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) in der Befragungsrunde 2017/2018 erhoben hat. Zum einen wurde die Dialektkompetenz abgefragt; überindividuell zeigt sich hier das bekannte Nord-Süd-Gefälle, beim individuellen Grad der Kompetenz der Dialektsprecher gibt es aber regional nur geringe Unterschiede. Zum anderen wurden die Bewertungen von Dialekten erhoben; hier werden Norddeutsch und Bayerisch besonders positiv, Sächsisch hingegen besonders negativ bewertet, wobei regionale Muster eine Rolle spielen. Auffällig ist ferner die bundesweit sehr einheitlich positive Bewertung des Hochdeutschen.