Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (117)
- Part of a Book (54)
- Article (43)
- Book (14)
- Contribution to a Periodical (4)
- Master's Thesis (4)
- Other (4)
- Working Paper (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Part of Periodical (2)
Language
- English (161)
- German (92)
- French (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (255) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (136)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (46)
- Postprint (22)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
- Preprint (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Association for Computational Linguistics (21)
- Springer (14)
- de Gruyter (14)
- Narr (11)
- European Language Resources Association (10)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (8)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie und Computerlinguistik (6)
- LiU Electronic Press (6)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (5)
- Zenodo (5)
The availability of electronic corpora of historical stages of languages has been wel- comed as possibly attenuating the inherent problem of diachronic linguistics, i.e. that we only have access to what has chanced to come down to us - the problem which was memorably named by Labov (1992) as one of “Bad Data”. However, such corpora can only give us access to an increased amount ot historical material and this can essentially still only be a partial and possibly distorted picture of the actual language at a particular period of history. Corpora can be improved by taking a more representative sample of extant texts if these are available (as they are in significant number for periods after the invention of printing). But, as examples from the recently compiled GerManC corpus of seventeenth and eighteenth century German show, the evidence from such corpora can still fail to yield definitive answers to our questions about earlier stages of a language. The data still require expert interpretation, and it is important to be realistic about what can legitimately be expected from an electronic historical corpus.
A constructicon, i.e., a structured inventory of constructions, essentially aims at documenting functions of lexical and grammatical constructions. Among other parameters, so-called constructional collo-profiles, as introduced by Herbst (2018, 2020), are conclusive for determining constructional meanings. They provide information on how relevant individual words are for construction slots, they hint at usage preferences of constructions and serve as a helpful indicator for semantic peculiarities of constructions. However, even though collo-profiles constitute an indispensable component of constructicon entries, they pose major challengers for constructicographers: For a constructicographic enterprise it is not feasible to conduct collostructional analyses for hundreds or even thousands of constructions. In this article, we introduce a procedure based on the large language model BERT that allows to predict collo-profiles without having to extensively annotate instances of constructions in a given corpus. Specifically, by discussing the constructions X macht Y ADJP (‘x makes Y ADJ’, e.g. he drives him crazy) and N1 PREP N1 (e.g., bumper to bumper, constructions over constructions), we show how the developed automated system generates collo-profiles based on a limited number of annotated instances. Finally, we place collo-profiles alongside other dimensions of constructional meanings included in the German Constructicon.
The Data Governance Act was proposed in late 2020 as part of the European Strategy for Data, and adopted on 30 May 2022 (as Regulation 2022/868). It will enter into application on 24 September 2023. The Data governance Act is a major development in the legal framework affecting CLARIN and the whole language community. With its new rules on the re-use of data held by the public sector bodies and on the provision of data sharing services, and especially its encouragement of data altruism, the Data Governance Act creates new opportunities and new challenges for CLARIN ERIC. This paper analyses the provisions of the Data Governance Act, and aims at initiating the debate on how they will impact CLARIN and the whole language community.
Linguistische Studien arbeiten häufig mit einer Differenzierung zwischen gesprochener und geschriebener Sprache bzw. zwischen Kommunikation der Nähe und Distanz. Die Annahme eines Kontinuums zwischen diesen Polen bietet sich für eine Verortung unterschiedlichster Äußerungsformen an, inklusive unkonventioneller Textsorten wie etwa Popsongs. Wir konzipieren, implementieren und evaluieren ein automatisiertes Verfahren, das mithilfe unkorrelierter Entscheidungsbäume entsprechende Vorhersagen auf Textebene durchführt. Für die Identifizierung der Pole definieren wir einen Merkmalskatalog aus Sprachphänomenen, die als Markierer für Nähe/Mündlichkeit bzw. Distanz/Schriftlichkeit diskutiert werden, und wenden diesen auf prototypische Nähe-/Mündlichkeitstexte sowie prototypische Distanz-/Schrifttexte an. Basierend auf der sehr guten Klassifikationsgüte verorten wir anschließend eine Reihe weiterer Textsorten mithilfe der trainierten Klassifikatoren. Dabei erscheinen Popsongs als „mittige Textsorte“, die linguistisch motivierte Merkmale unterschiedlicher Kontinuumsstufen vereint. Weiterhin weisen wir nach, dass unsere Modelle mündlich kommunizierte, aber vorab oder nachträglich verschriftlichte Äußerungen wie Reden oder Interviews vollkommen anders verorten als prototypische Gesprächsdaten und decken Klassifikationsunterschiede für Social-Media-Varianten auf. Ziel ist dabei nicht eine systematisch-verbindliche Einordung im Kontinuum, sondern eine empirische Annäherung an die Frage, welche maschinell vergleichsweise einfach bestimmbaren Merkmale („shallow features“) nachweisbar Einfluss auf die Verortung haben.
"Das im Januar 2022 gestartete Projekt "Sprachanfragen" (https://www.ids-mannheim.de/gra/projekte2/sprachanfragen/) verfolgt erstmalig das Ziel, Sprachanfragedaten zu erfassen, aufzubereiten und ein wissenschaftsöffentliches Monitorkorpus aus ihnen zu erstellen. Dazukommend wird eine Rechercheschnittstelle entwickelt, mit der die Sprachanfragen systematisch wissenschaftlich analysierbar gemacht werden. Das Poster gibt einen Überblick über das Projekt, zeigt erste Ergebnisse und bietet einen Ausblick auf Überlegungen zur Konzeption eines Chatbots zur automatisierten Beantwortung von Sprachanfragen." Ein Beitrag zur 9. Tagung des Verbands "Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum" - DHd 2023 Open Humanities Open Culture.
Einleitung
(2023)
CLARIAH-DE cross-service search - prospects and benefits of merging subject-specific services
(2021)
CLARIAH-DE combines services and offerings of CLARIN-D and DARIAH-DE. This includes various search applications which are made directly available to researchers. These search applications are presented in this working paper based on their main characteristics and compared with a focus on possible harmonizations. Opportunities and risks of different forms of technical integration are highlighted. Identified challenges can be explained in particular considering the background of different organizational and technical frameworks as well as highly specific and discipline-dependent requirements. The integration work that has already been carried out and the experiences gained with regard to future work and possible integration of further applications are also discussed. The experiences made in CLARIAH-DE can especially be of interest for other projects in the field of digital research infrastructures.
In order to differentiate between figurative and literal usage of verb-noun combinations for the shared task on the disambiguation of German Verbal Idioms issued for KONVENS 2021, we apply and extend an approach originally developed for detecting idioms in a dataset consisting of random ngram samples. The classification is done by implementing a rather shallow, statistics-based pipeline without intensive preprocessing and examinations on the morphosyntactic and semantic level. We describe the overall approach, the differences between the original dataset and the dataset of the KONVENS task, provide experimental classification results, and analyse the individual contributions of our feature sets.
The 12th Web as Corpus workshop (WAC-XII) looks at the past, present, and future of web corpora given the fact that large web corpora are nowadays provided mostly by a few major initiatives and companies, and the diversity of the early years appears to have faded slightly. Also, we acknowledge the fact that alternative sources of data (such as data from Twitter and similar platforms) have emerged, some of them only available to large companies and their affiliates, such as linguistic data from social media and other forms of the deep web. At the same time, gathering interesting and relevant web data (web crawling) is becoming an ever more intricate task as the nature of the data offered on the web changes (for example the death of forums in favour of more closed platforms).
In a recent paper published in the Journal of Language Evolution, Kauhanen, Einhaus & Walkden (KEW) challenge the results presented in one of my papers (Koplenig, Royal Society Open Science, 6, 181274 (2019)), in which I tried to show through a series of statistical analyses that large numbers of L2 (second language) speakers do not seem to affect the (grammatical or statistical) complexity of a language. To this end, I focus on the way in which the Ethnologue assesses language status: a language is characterised as vehicular if, in addition to being used by L1 (first language) speakers, it should also have a significant number of L2 users. KEW criticise both the use of vehicularity as a (binary) indicator of whether a language has a significant number of L2 users and the idea of imputing a zero proportion of L2 speakers to non-vehicular languages whenever a direct estimate of that proportion is unavailable. While I recognise the importance of post-publication commentary on published research, I show in this rejoinder that both points of criticism are explicitly mentioned and analysed in my paper. In addition, I also comment on other points raised by KEW and demonstrate that both alternative analyses offered by KEW do not stand up to closer scrutiny.