Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (2)
- German (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Topikalisierung (4) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Elsevier (1)
- FFLCH-USP (1)
- Universität Tübingen (1)
The motivation for this article is to describe a methodology for interrelating and analyzing language and theory-specific corpus data from various languages. As an example phenomeon we use information structure (IS, see [3]) in treebanks from three languages: Spanish, Korean and Japanese. Korean and Japanese are typologically close, while both are typologically different from Spanish. Therefore, the problem of annotating IS is that there are diverging language-specific formal linguistic means for the realization of IS-functions (like “topicalization / contrast”) on various levels like prosody, morphology and word-order. Hence, it is necessary to describe the relations between language-specific formal means and functional views on IS, and how to operationalize these relations for corpus analysis.
An important role in the coherence of texts is played by the distribution of information in the sentence. The present paper especially examines the beginning of sentences (topics). Which syntactic elements are most adequate to initiate a sentence, and which of their characteristics can be considered responsible for this? After a short review of the pertinent literature, we shall present grammatical, semantic and pragmatic factors that organize topicalization. The point of departure are the patterns of basic serialization as defined by the grammar. Deviations of these patterns can particularly be a result of the principle of known information. In addition to this constitutive principle, we can distinguish five regulative principles that lead to non-marked topicalizations (situation, empathy, iconicity, lengthening terms, text connection). In the closing sections, the positioning of phrasal accents and some special types of topics will be discussed. All the examples given are from modem German.
Dieses Papier diskutiert informationsstrukturelle Aspekte der mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Auf der Grundlage einer größtenteils aus den IDS-Korpora extrahierten Belegsammlung werden Diskursgegebenheit, Fokus- und Topikstatus (vor allem) des Vorfeldmaterials beschrieben und in Bezug zu entsprechenden Aussagen in der Literatur gesetzt. Neben informationsstrukturellen Faktoren werden im letzten Abschnitt mögliche weitere Faktoren angesprochen, die mehrfache Vorfeldbesetzung favorisieren könnten. Zudem werden für einen begrenzten Ausschnitt des Deutschen erstmals Zahlen vorgelegt, die das Verhältnis von mehrfacher Vorfeldbesetzung zur ähnlichen, aber als „kanonischer“ geltenden Besetzung des Vorfelds mit einer (möglicherweise partiellen) Verbalphrase illustrieren.