Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (7)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Keywords
- Datenqualität (9) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (8)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Contents:
1. Vasile Pais, Maria Mitrofan, Verginica Barbu Mititelu, Elena Irimia, Roxana Micu and Carol Luca Gasan: Challenges in Creating a Representative Corpus of Romanian Micro-Blogging Text. Pp. 1-7
2. Modest von Korff: Exhaustive Indexing of PubMed Records with Medical Subject Headings. Pp. 8-15
3. Luca Brigada Villa: UDeasy: a Tool for Querying Treebanks in CoNLL-U Format. Pp. 16-19
4. Nils Diewald: Matrix and Double-Array Representations for Efficient Finite State Tokenization. Pp. 20-26
5. Peter Fankhauser and Marc Kupietz: Count-Based and Predictive Language Models for Exploring DeReKo. Pp. 27-31
6. Hanno Biber: “The word expired when that world awoke.” New Challenges for Research with Large Text Corpora and Corpus-Based Discourse Studies in Totalitarian Times. Pp. 32-35
FAIR-Prinzipien und Qualitätskriterien für Transkriptionsdaten. Empfehlungen und offene Fragen
(2022)
Dieser Beitrag behandelt die mittlerweile als Bestandteil guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis anerkannten FAIR-Prinzipien in Bezug auf die Transkription und Annotation gesprochener Sprache und multimodaler Interaktion. Forschungsdaten - und somit Transkriptionsdaten - sollen heute Findable, Accessible, Interoperable und Reusable sein. Der Beitrag versucht dementsprechend, empirische Methoden im Prozess der Digitalisierung und generische Prinzipien des digitalen Forschungsdatenmanagements zusammenzubringen, um für diesen Kontext einem operationalisierten Begriff der „FAIRness“ näher zu kommen und möglichst konkrete Empfehlungen aufzustellen. Der Beitrag sollte aber gleichzeitig zur Diskussion anregen, denn konkrete Anforderungen in Bezug auf das Forschungsdatenmanagement und die Datenqualität müssen auch im Rahmen der FAIR-Prinzipien von den Fachgemeinschaften selbst herausgearbeitet werden.
Measuring the quality of metadata is only possible by assessing the quality of the underlying schema and the metadata instance. We propose some factors that are measurable automatically for metadata according to the CMD framework, taking into account the variability of schemas that can be defined in this framework. The factors include among others the number of elements, the (re-)use of reusable components, the number of filled in elements. The resulting score can serve as an indicator of the overall quality of the CMD instance, used for feedback to metadata providers or to provide an overview of the overall quality of metadata within a repository. The score is independent of specific schemas and generalizable. An overall assessment of harvested metadata is provided in form of statistical summaries and the distribution, based on a corpus of harvested metadata. The score is implemented in XQuery and can be used in tools, editors and repositories.
The Component MetaData Infrastructure (CMDI) is the dominant framework for describing language resources according to ISO 24622 (ISO/TC 37/SC 4, 2015). Within the CLARIN world, CMDI has become a huge success. The Virtual Language Observatory (VLO) now holds over 800.000 resources, all described with CMDI-based metadata. With the metadata being harvested from about thirty centres, there is a considerable amount of heterogeneity in the data. In part, there is some use of controlled vocabularies to keep data heterogeneity in check, say when describing the type of a resource, or the country the resource is originating from. However, when CMDI data refers to the names of persons or organisations, strings are used in a rather uncontrolled manner. Here, the CMDI community can learn from libraries and archives who maintain standardised lists for all kinds of names. In this paper, we advocate the use of freely available authority files that support the unique identification of persons, organisations, and more. The systematic use of authority records enhances the quality of the metadata, hence improves the faceted browsing experience in the VLO, and also prepares the sharing of CMDI-based metadata with the data in library catalogues.
This paper presents the QUEST project and describes concepts and tools that are being developed within its framework. The goal of the project is to establish quality criteria and curation criteria for annotated audiovisual language data. Building on existing resources developed by the participating institutions earlier, QUEST also develops tools that could be used to facilitate and verify adherence to these criteria. An important focus of the project is making these tools accessible for researchers without substantial technical background and helping them produce high-quality data. The main tools we intend to provide are a questionnaire and automatic quality assurance for depositors of language resources, both developed as web applications. They are accompanied by a knowledge base, which will contain recommendations and descriptions of best practices established in the course of the project. Conceptually, we consider three main data maturity levels in order to decide on a suitable level of strictness of the quality assurance. This division has been introduced to avoid that a set of ideal quality criteria prevent researchers from depositing or even assessing their (legacy) data. The tools described in the paper are work in progress and are expected to be released by the end of the QUEST project in 2022.
Towards comprehensive definitions of data quality for audiovisual annotated language resources
(2021)
Though digital infrastructures such as CLARIN have been successfully established and now provide large collections of digital resources, the lack of widely accepted standards for data quality and documentation still makes re-use of research data a difficult endeavour, especially for more complex resource types. The article gives a detailed overview over relevant characteristics of audiovisual annotated language resources and reviews possible approaches to data quality in terms of their suitability for the current context. Conclusively, various strategies are suggested in order to arrive at comprehensive and adequate definitions of data quality for this specific resource type and possibly for digital language resources in general.
In this paper, we present our experiences and decisions in dealing with challenges in developing, maintaining and operating online research software tools in the field of linguistics. In particular, we highlight reproducibility, dependability, and security as important aspects of quality management – taking into account the special circumstances in which research software
is usually created.
Towards Comprehensive Definitions of Data Quality for Audiovisual Annotated Language Resources
(2020)
Though digital infrastructures such as CLARIN have been successfully established and now provide large collections of digital resources, the lack of widely accepted standards for data quality and documentation still makes re-use of research data a difficult endeavour, especially for more complex resource types. The article gives a detailed overview over relevant characteristics of audiovisual annotated language resources and reviews possible approaches to data quality in terms of their suitability for the current context. Conclusively, various strategies are suggested in order to arrive at comprehensive and adequate definitions of data quality for this particular resource type.
This paper presents the QUEST project and describes concepts and tools that are being developed within its framework. The goal of the project is to establish quality criteria and curation criteria for annotated audiovisual language data. Building on existing resources developed by the participating institutions earlier, QUEST develops tools that could be used to facilitate and verify adherence to these criteria. An important focus of the project is making these tools accessible for researchers without substantial technical background and helping them produce high-quality data. The main tools we intend to provide are the depositors’ questionnaire and automatic quality assurance, both developed as web applications. They are accompanied by a Knowledge base, which will contain recommendations and descriptions of best practices established in the course of the project. Conceptually, we split linguistic data into three resource classes (data deposits, collections and corpora). The class of a resource defines the strictness of the quality assurance it should undergo. This division is introduced so that too strict quality criteria do not prevent researchers from depositing their data.