Refine
Document Type
- Book (5)
- Article (4)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Course Material (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (14) (remove)
Keywords
- Psycholinguistik (14) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (6)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (6)
- Peer-Review (5)
Publisher
- Narr (2)
- de Gruyter (2)
- Cambridge University Press (1)
- Dike (1)
- Frank & Timme (1)
- Frontiers Media SA (1)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (1)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (1)
- Sage Publications (1)
- Springer (1)
The NottDeuYTSch corpus is a freely available collection of YouTube comments written under German-speaking videos by young people between 2008 and 2018. The article uses the NottDeuYTSch corpus to investigate how YouTube comments can be used to produce learning materials and how corpora of Digitally-Mediated Communication can benefit intermediate learners of German. The article details the effects of authentic communication within YouTube comments on teenage learners, examining how they can influence the psycholinguistic factors of motivation, foreign language anxiety, and willingness to communicate. The article also discusses the benefits and limitations of using authentic corpus material for the development of teaching material.
Prediction is a central mechanism in the human language processing architecture. The psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic literature has seen a lively debate about what form prediction may take and what status it has for language processing in the human mind and brain. While predictions are a ubiquitous finding, the implications of these results for models of language processing differ. For instance, eyetracking data suggest that predictions may rely on sublexical orthographic information in natural reading, while electrophysiological data provide mixed evidence for form-based predictions during reading. Other research has revealed that humans rapidly adapt to text specifics and that their predictive capacity varies, broadly speaking, in accordance with inter- and intra-individual language proficiency, which cuts across the speaker groups (e.g. L1 vs. L2 speakers, skilled vs. untrained readers) traditionally used for experimental contrasts. There is therefore evidence that the kind and strength of linguistic predictions depend on (at least) three sources of variability in language processing: speaker, text genre and experimental method.
The aim of this Research Topic is to develop a better understanding of prediction in light of the three sources of variability in language processing, by providing an overview of state-of-the art research on predictive language processing and by bringing together research from various disciplines.
First, intra-and inter-individual differences and their influence on predictive processes remain underrepresented in experimental research on predictive processing. How do language users differ in their predictive abilities and strategies, and how are these differences shaped by e.g. biological, social and cultural factors?
Second, while language users experience great stylistic diversity in their daily language exposure and use, the majority of language processing research still focuses on a very constrained register of well-controlled sentences composed in the standard language. How are predictions shaped by extra- and meta-linguistic context, such as register/genre or accent/speaker identity, and how may this influence the processing of experimental items in another language or text variety?
Third, the Research Topic invites contributions that make use of a multi-method approach, such as combined behavioral and electrophysiological measures or experimental methods combined with measures extracted from corpus data. What opportunities and challenges do we face when integrating multiple approaches to examine linguistic, experimental and individual differences in human predictive capacity?
We welcome contributions from all areas of empirical psycho- and neurolinguistics, but contributions must explicitly address variability and variation in language and language processing. Relevant topics include individual differences and the impact of genre, modality, register and language variety. Contributions that go beyond single word and single sentence paradigms are especially desirable. Experimental, corpus-based, meta-analytic and review papers, as well as theoretical/opinion pieces are welcome; however, papers of the latter type should support their arguments with substantial empirical evidence from the literature. Particularly desirable are contributions which combine topics and/or methods, such as the impact of an individual's native dialect on processing of constructions that show variability in the standard language (e.g. choice of auxiliary, agreement of mass nouns, etc.) or experimental methods combined with measures extracted from corpus data such as information-theoretic surprisal.
Codeswitching
(2018)
Neologisms, i.e., new words or meanings, are finding their way into everyday language use all the time. In the process, already existing elements of a language are recombined or linguistic material from other languages is borrowed. But are borrowed neologisms accepted similarly well by the speech community as neologisms that were formed from “native” material? We investigate this question based on neologisms in German. Building on the corresponding results of a corpus study, we test the hypothesis of whether “native” neologisms are more readily accepted than those borrowed from English. To do so, we use a psycholinguistic experimental paradigm that allows us to estimate the degree of uncertainty of the participants based on the mouse trajectories of their responses. Unexpectedly, our results suggest that the neologisms borrowed from English are accepted more frequently, more quickly, and more easily than the “native” ones. These effects, however, are restricted to people born after 1980, the so-called millenials. We propose potential explanations for this mismatch between corpus results and experimental data and argue, among other things, for a reinterpretation of previous corpus studies.
mentales Lexikon
(2018)
Handschrift ist ein alltägliches Phänomen – sie begegnet uns in der Schule, auf Einkaufszetteln oder auch als Unterschrift. Über die grammatischen und insbesondere die graphematischen Grundlagen der Handschrift wissen wir allerdings nur wenig. Dabei bieten Handschriften mehr Variationsmöglichkeiten als etwa Druckschriften und können deshalb mehr grammatische Strukturen sichtbar machen, als dies in gedruckten Texten der Fall ist.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung zeigt, dass strukturelle Eigenheiten einer Handschrift oft mit grammatischen Eigenheiten zusammenfallen, etwa durch die Markierung komplexer Grapheme, Silben-, Morphem- und Fußgrenzen oder auch durch die Auszeichnung bestimmter Buchstabenformen wie ‹e›, wenn es mit Schwa korrespondiert. Dazu werden Abituraufsätze untersucht, graphetisch und grammatisch annotiert und ausgewertet.
Repeating the movements associated with activities such as drawing or sports typically leads to improvements in kinematic behavior: these movements become faster, smoother, and exhibit less variation. Likewise, practice has also been shown to lead to faster and smoother movement trajectories in speech articulation. However, little is known about its effect on articulatory variability. To address this, we investigate the extent to which repetition and predictability influence the articulation of the frequent German word “sie” [zi] (they). We find that articulatory variability is proportional to speaking rate and the duration of [zi], and that overall variability decreases as [zi] is repeated during the experiment. Lower variability is also observed as the conditional probability of [zi] increases, and the greatest reduction in variability occurs during the execution of the vocalic target of [i]. These results indicate that practice can produce observable differences in the articulation of even the most common gestures used in speech.
Over the past decade, conducting empirical research in linguistics has become increasingly popular. The first of its kind, this book provides an engaging and practical introduction to this exciting versatile field, providing a comprehensive overview of research aspects in general, and covering a broad range of subdiscipline-specific methodological approaches. Subfields covered include language documentation and descriptive linguistics, language typology, corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics and anthropological linguistics, cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics, and neurolinguistics. The book reflects on the strengths and weaknesses of each single approach and on how they interact with one-another across the study of language in its many diverse facets. It also includes exercises, example student projects and recommendations for further reading, along with additional online teaching materials. Providing hands-on experience, and written in an engaging and accessible style, this unique and comprehensive guide will give students the inspiration they need to develop their own research projects in empirical linguistics.
The teaching slides accompany the following textbook:
Svenja Völkel & Franziska Kretzschmar (2021): Introducing linguistic research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The slides follow the structure of the book chapters and can be used for teaching in class. They include the basic information per chapter and exercises to work on in class or as homework. More detailed information, additional exercises, suggestions for research projects and recommendations for further reading can be found in the textbook.
Einstellungen und Meinungen prägen das menschliche Handeln; auch die Sprache, die einen zentralen Anker der menschlichen Identität bildet, ist davon betroffen. Der vorliegende Band präsentiert die Ergebnisse eines interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekts zu aktuellen Spracheinstellungen in Deutschland aus sprachwissenschaftlicher und aus sozialpsychologischer Sicht. Mentale Konzepte von Dialekten werden dabei ebenso besprochen wie Bewertungen von Deutsch und anderen Sprachen, Stereotype und Eigen- und Fremdbewertungen.
Des Weiteren wird in einer Sprachstandserhebung die Stellung der deutschen Sprache in Deutschland in der Zusammenschau mehrerer einschlägiger Daten und Statistiken, etwa zur Stellung des Deutschen an Schulen und Hochschulen oder zu deutschsprachigen Medien, dokumentiert.
Der Band bietet damit die bislang erste umfassende Darstellung von Einstellungen zum Deutschen, zu Varietäten des Deutschen, zu anderen Sprachen und zu Sprechern dieser Sprachen und Varietäten.