Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5) (remove)
Keywords
- Information Retrieval (5) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (3)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2)
Publisher
The landscape of digital lexical resources is often characterized by dedicated local portals and proprietary interfaces as primary access points for scholars and the interested public. In addition, legal and technical restrictions are potential issues that can make it difficult to efficiently query and use these valuable resources. As part of the research data consortium Text+, solutions for the storage and provision of digital language resources are being developed and provided in the context of the unified cross-domain German research data infrastructure NFDI. The specific topic of accessing lexical resources in a diverse and heterogenous landscape with a variety of participating institutions and established technical solutions is met with the development of the federated search and query framework LexFCS. The LexFCS extends the established CLARIN Federated Content Search that already allows accessing spatially distributed text corpora using a common specification of technical interfaces, data formats, and query languages. This paper describes the current state of development of the LexFCS, gives an insight into its technical details, and provides an outlook on its future development.
Beyond Citations: Corpus-based Methods for Detecting the Impact of Research Outcomes on Society
(2020)
This paper proposes, implements and evaluates a novel, corpus-based approach for identifying categories indicative of the impact of research via a deductive (top-down, from theory to data) and an inductive (bottom-up, from data to theory) approach. The resulting categorization schemes differ in substance. Research outcomes are typically assessed by using bibliometric methods, such as citation counts and patterns, or alternative metrics, such as references to research in the media. Shortcomings with these methods are their inability to identify impact of research beyond academia (bibliometrics) and considering text-based impact indicators beyond those that capture attention (altmetrics). We address these limitations by leveraging a mixed-methods approach for eliciting impact categories from experts, project personnel (deductive) and texts (inductive). Using these categories, we label a corpus of project reports per category schema, and apply supervised machine learning to infer these categories from project reports. The classification results show that we can predict deductively and inductively derived impact categories with 76.39% and 78.81% accuracy (F1-score), respectively. Our approach can complement solutions from bibliometrics and scientometrics for assessing the impact of research and studying the scope and types of advancements transferred from academia to society.
Contents:
1. Johannes Graën, Tannon Kew, Anastassia Shaitarova and Martin Volk, "Modelling Large Parallel Corpora", S. 1-8
2. Pedro Javier Ortiz Suárez, Benoît Sagot and Laurent Romary, "Asynchronous Pipelines for Processing Huge Corpora on Medium to Low Resource Infrastructures", S. 9-16
3. Vladimír Benko, "Deduplication in Large Web Corpora", S. 17-22
4. Mark Davies, "The best of both worlds: Multi-billion word “dynamic” corpora", S. 23-28
5. Adrien Barbaresi, "On the need for domain-focused web corpora", S. 29-32
6. Marc Kupietz, Eliza Margaretha, Nils Diewald, Harald Lüngen and Peter Fankhauser, "What's New in EuReCo? Interoperability, Comparable Corpora, Licensing", S. 33-39
Mit den hier zusammengefassten Überlegungen wird ein Problem aufgegriffen, das sich in der germanistisch-philologischen Fachdiskussion durchaus stellt, nämlich, ob es einen Unterschied zwischen Namen und Wörtern gibt. Dieser spiegelt sich etwa im Unterschied zwischen Namenbüchern einerseits und Wörterbüchern andererseits wieder. Hier wird weiter von der auf lexikalische beziehungsweise onomastische Eigenschaften konzentrierten Behandlung von Wörtern oder Namen jeweils auch eine eher enzyklopädische Darstellung der durch die Wörter oder Namen bezeichneten Phänomene unterschieden.
The paper describes preliminary studies regarding the usage of Example-Based Querying for specialist corpora. We outline an infrastructure for its application within the linguistic domain. Example-Based Querying deals with retrieval situations where users would like to explore large collections of specialist texts semantically, but are unable to explicitly name the linguistic phenomenon they look for. As a way out, the proposed framework allows them to input prototypical everyday language examples or cases of doubt, which are automatically processed by CRF and linked to appropriate linguistic texts in the corpus.