Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Handschrift (3) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Helmut Buske (1)
- Winter (1)
- de Gruyter (1)
Handschrift ist ein alltägliches Phänomen – sie begegnet uns in der Schule, auf Einkaufszetteln oder auch als Unterschrift. Über die grammatischen und insbesondere die graphematischen Grundlagen der Handschrift wissen wir allerdings nur wenig. Dabei bieten Handschriften mehr Variationsmöglichkeiten als etwa Druckschriften und können deshalb mehr grammatische Strukturen sichtbar machen, als dies in gedruckten Texten der Fall ist.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung zeigt, dass strukturelle Eigenheiten einer Handschrift oft mit grammatischen Eigenheiten zusammenfallen, etwa durch die Markierung komplexer Grapheme, Silben-, Morphem- und Fußgrenzen oder auch durch die Auszeichnung bestimmter Buchstabenformen wie ‹e›, wenn es mit Schwa korrespondiert. Dazu werden Abituraufsätze untersucht, graphetisch und grammatisch annotiert und ausgewertet.
The question of whether a letter is a grapheme or not is a perennial issue in writing research. The answer depends on which criteria are used to differentiate between letters and graphemes and, ultimately,how the unit ‘grapheme’ is defined. This problem is particularly relevant to complex graphemes, i.e. sequences of letters that behave like a single grapheme in certain respects. Typical for German is the ‹ch›. This paper argues for a scalar concept of graphemes, which compares the grapheme status of each of the units under investigation. For this purpose, new criteria for the identification of complex graphemes are used, which originate from handwriting analysis. There, it is shown that complex graphemes are connected with each other disproportionately often and also have deviating letter forms disproportionately often.
In contrast to printed letters, handwritten texts show a larger amount of variation regarding letter shape and letter contact. This variation though might not be totally random but could follow a certain grammatical or structural function. By analysing a corpus of 10.117 graphs written by four writers, this paper explores which structures and which functions correlate. More precisely, it will be shown that the shape of certain letters might indicate syllabic, morphologic od prosodic structures. In addition, it will be shown that handwritten texts present the words’ structure better than printed texts could do. Overall, this paper points out how handwritten scripts show the graphematic principles known from printing even better than printed texts do.