Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (9)
- Article (2)
- Book (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Verstehen (13) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
- Peer-Review (1)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Stauffenburg (4)
- Narr (3)
- Amsterdam (1)
- Universität (1)
- Winter (1)
- de Gruyter (1)
Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick darüber, wie grundlegend Wissen als Vorausssetzung, Gegenstand und Produkt von Verständigungsprozessen für die Organisation von Gesprächen ist. Zunächst wird ein kognitivistischer Zugang zu Wissen mit einem sozialkonstruktivistischen kontrastiert. Es werden zum einen kommunikative Gattungen, die auf die Kommunikation von Wissen spezialisiert sind, dargestellt; zum anderen wird gezeigt, wie Wissen auch dann die Gestaltung der Interaktion bestimmt, wenn der primäre Gesprächszweck nicht in Wissensvermittlung besteht. Vier Dimensionen werden angesprochen: a) Das mit dem Adressaten geteilte Wissen (common ground) ist Grundlage des Adressatenzuschnitts von Äußerungen (recipient design); b)geteiltes Wissen wird in Verständigungsprozessen konstituiert; c) der relative epistemische Status der Gesprächspartner zueinander wird durch Praktiken des epistemic stance-taking verdeutlicht und bestimmt selbst die Interpretation von Äußerungsformaten; d) epistemischer Status, soziale Identität und Beziehungskonstitution sind durch moralische Anspruchs- und Erwartungsstrukturen eng miteinander verknüpft.
be-deuten: Vorwort
(2002)
The paper discusses the range of findings and theoretical concepts on which a conversation analytic study of the constitution of meaning in interaction might draw. It focuses on research on problems of word-semantics and linguistic categorization in context which have been researched by cognitivists and conversation analysts. While cognitive studies have mainly dealt with semantic representation, syntactico-semantic composition and the impact of pragmatic and inferential factors on interpretation, discursive approaches have centered upon interactional processes and the uses and functions of categorization in talk-in-interaction. The article concludes with a discussion of the prospects and eventual benefits of a more intense combination of the cognitive and the discursive approach.
The paper discusses the range of findings and theoretical concepts on which a conversation analytic study of the constitution of meaning in interaction might draw. It focuses on research on problems of word-semantics and linguistic categorization in context which have been researched by cognitivists and conversation analysts. While cognitive studies have mainly dealt with semantic representation, syntactico-semantic composition and the impact of pragmatic and inferential factors on interpretation, discursive approaches have centered upon interactional processes and the uses and functions of categorization in talk-in-interaction. The article concludes with a discussion of the prospects and eventual benefits of a more intense combination of the cognitive and the discursive approach.
This paper shows how understanding in interaction is informed by temporality, and in particular, by the workings of retrospection. Understanding is a temporally extended, sequentially organized process. Temporality, namely, the sequential relationship of turn positions, equips participants with default mechanisms to display understandings and to expect such displays. These mechanisms require local management of turn-taking to be in order, i.e., the possibility and the expectation to respond locally and reciprocally to prior turns at talk. Sequential positions of turns in interaction provide an infrastructure for displaying understanding and accomplishing intersubjectivity. Linguistic practices specialized in displaying particular kinds of (not) understanding are adapted to the individual sequential positions with respect to an action-to-be-understood.