Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (4)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Article (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (4)
- Annotation (3)
- Diskursanalyse (3)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (2)
- Parser (2)
- Strukturbaum (2)
- Auszeichnungssprache (1)
- Computational linguistics (1)
- Concurrent Markup/Overlap (1)
- Discourse analysis (1)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (3)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (7) (remove)
Publisher
This study examines what kind of cues and constraints for discourse interpretation can be derived from the logical and generic document structure of complex texts by the example of scientific journal articles. We performed statistical analysis on a corpus of scientific articles annotated on different annotations layers within the framework of XML-based multi-layer annotation. We introduce different discourse segment types that constrain the textual domains in which to identify rhetorical relation spans, and we show how a canonical sequence of text type structure categories is derived from the corpus annotations. Finally, we demonstrate how and which text type structure categories assigned to complex discourse segments of the type “block” statistically constrain the occurrence of rhetorical relation types.
In the project SemDok (Generic document structures in linearly organised texts) funded by the German Research Foundation DFG, a discourse parser for a complex type (scientific articles by example), is being developed. Discourse parsing (henceforth DP) according to the Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) (Mann and Taboada, 2005; Marcu, 2000) deals with automatically assigning a text a tree structure in which discourse segments and rhetorical relations between them are marked, such as Concession. For identifying the combinable segments, declarative rules are employed, which describe linguistic and structural cues and constraints about possible combinations by referring to different XML annotation layers of the input text, and external knowledge bases such as a discourse marker lexicon, a lexico-semantic ontology (later to be combined with a domain ontology), and an ontology of rhetorical relations. In our text-technological environment, the obvious choice of formalism to represent such ontologies is OWL (Smith et al., 2004). In this paper, we describe two OWL ontologies and how they are consulted from the discourse parser to solve certain tasks within DP. The first ontology is a taxononomy of rhetorical relations which was developed in the project. The second one is an OWL version of GermaNet, the model of which we designed together with our project partners.
Im Teilprojekt CI “SemDok” der DFG-Forschergruppe Texttechnologische Informationsmodellierung wurde ein Textparser für Diskursstrukturen wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenartikel nach der Rhetorical Structure Theory entwickelt. Die wesentlichen konzeptuellen und technischen Merkmale des Chart-Parsers und die sich daraus ergebenden Parametrisierungsmöglichkeiten für Parsing-Experimente werden beschrieben. Zudem wird HPVtz., ein Tool für die Visualisierung von Parsing-Ergebnissen (RST-Bäume in einer XML-Anwendung) und die Navigation in ihnen, vorgestellt.
Discourse parsing of complex text types such as scientific research articles requires the analysis of an input document on linguistic and structural levels that go beyond traditionally employed lexical discourse markers. This chapter describes a text-technological approach to discourse parsing. Discourse parsing with the aim of providing a discourse structure is seen as the addition of a new annotation layer for input documents marked up on several linguistic annotation levels. The discourse parser generates discourse structures according to the Rhetorical Structure Theory. An overview of the knowledge sources and components for parsing scientific joumal articles is given. The parser’s core consists of cascaded applications of the GAP, a Generic Annotation Parser. Details of the chart parsing algorithm are provided, as well as a short evaluation in terms of comparisons with reference annotations from our corpus and with recently developed Systems with a similar task.
Making CONCUR work
(2005)
The SGML feature CONCUR allowed for a document to be simultaneously marked up in multiple conflicting hierarchical tagsets but validated and interpreted in one tagset at a time. Alas, CONCUR was rarely implemented, and XML does not address the problem of conflicting hierarchies at all. The MuLaX document syntax is a non-XML syntax that enables multiply-encoded hierarchies by distinguishing different “layers” in the hierarchy by adding a layer ID as a prefix to the element names. The IDs tie all the elements in a single hierarchy together in an “annotation layer”. Extraction of a single annotation layer results in a well-formed XML document, and each annotation layer may be associated with an XML schema. The MuLaX processing model works on the nodes of one annotation layer at a time through Xpath-like navigation. CONCUR lives!
Discourse segmentation is the division of a text into minimal discourse segments, which form the leaves in the trees that are used to represent discourse structures. A definition of elementary discourse segments in German is provided by adapting widely used segmentation principles for English minimal units, while considering punctuation, morphology, sytax, and aspects of the logical document structure of a complex text type, namely scientific articles. The algorithm and implementation of a discourse segmenter based on these principles is presented, as well an evaluation of test runs.