Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (32)
- Article (19)
- Review (14)
Language
- German (65) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (65)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (65)
Keywords
- Rezension (20)
- Deutsch (15)
- Linguistik (11)
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte (9)
- Lexikographie (8)
- Wörterbuch (6)
- Grimm, Jacob (5)
- Sprache (5)
- Sprachgeschichte (5)
- Geschichte (4)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (65) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (64)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
Rolf Bergmann und Peter Pauly: Neuhochdeutsch. Arbeitsbuch zum linguistischen Unterricht [Rezension]
(1976)
Horst Grünert: Sprache und Politik. Untersuchungen zum Sprachgebrauch der ‘Paulskirche’ [Rezension]
(1977)
Hätte ADELUNG (1793-1801, 2. Aufl.) Wörter wie 'Bekanntmachung, konkurrieren, Leutnant' aufnehmen sollen? Hätte SANDERS (1860/65) 'arithmetisch, Hilferuf, Volksbildung' berücksichtigen sollen? Fehlen 'Einsatzfähigkeit, musikliebend, Verständigungsgrundlage' im WDG (1964-77) mit Recht? Ist eine solche Fragestellung, bezogen auf Einzelbeispiele, überhaupt sinnvoll? Gibt es allgemein bekannte Wortbildungen, die in allgemeinsprachlichen Wörterbüchern grundsätzlich nicht zu berücksichtigen sind? Unser Beitrag möchte derartige Probleme der Stichwortaufnahme einiger für ihre Epoche repräsentativer deutscher Wörterbücher an konkreten Materialien möglichst anschaulich diskutieren.
Jacob Grimm was a very productive member of the Royal Academy of Sciences in Berlin. Between 1842 and 1863 he made speeches at least on 66 days of sitting. Grimm was one of the academy’s most active and most famous speakers. Many of his speeches were not only concerned with philological questions. He also confessed his views about other scientific disciplines or problems of public interest. Grimm emphasized the international character of sciences and expressed the high respect he payed to the cultural traditions of other peoples.
The most important modern research on characteristic features and the history of language usage in Berlin are those of Agathe Lasch and Hermann Tetjchebt. Both authors disagree on the question of Upper Saxon influence on early Berlin language. As early as the end of the 18th century there was a lively discussion of problems concerning the representative standard of German pronunciation and other regional differences by teachers of Berlin grammar schools. They recommended a Northern German variant of pronunciation instead of the traditional Saxon one. The membership of the Royal Academy of Sciences gave them an occasion to find a public audience and to produce a noticeable effect.
Vorbemerkung
(1988)
Die Brüder Grimm
(1994)
Karl Philipp Moritz über Sprache, Hochdeutsch, Berliner Umgangssprache und märkischen Dialekt
(1995)
Plea for a modern corpus-based German lexicography
There is an eminent research tradition within German lexicography; Grimm’s dictionary, the most impressive achievement of this scholarly work, was soon to become the model of many similar enterprises. But not only is it largely outdated by now (most entries are based on work of the 19th century): there is generally an increasing gap in German lexicographical research between what is needed and possible, on the one hand, and what is actually achieved, on the other. Several reasons for this unsatisfactory situation are discussed; the most important among these is probably that the actual practice of all larger enterprises in this field is still dominated by methods of the 19th century. The new edition of Grimm’s dictionary, which was started in the Fifties, will probably never be completed, if continued as at present. The only way to overcome this unsatisfactory situation and to approach the standards reached in other countries would be a comprehensive corpus-based lexical enterprise with highly flexible task-specific software tools.