Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Article (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Deutsch (2)
- Nominalkompositum (2)
- Sprachgeschichte (2)
- Empirische Forschung (1)
- Genitiv (1)
- Grammatik (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- Morphologie (1)
- Morphologie <Linguistik> (1)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2)
- Postprint (1)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
- Peer-Review (1)
Publisher
- Benjamins (2)
- Peter Lang (1)
Present-day German uses two formally different patterns of compounding in N+N compounds. The first combines bare stems (e.g. Tisch+decke ‘tablecloth’) while the second contains an intervening linking element (LE) as in Geburt-s-ort ‘birth-LE-place’. The linked compounding type developed in Early New High German (1350–1650) from phrasal constructions by reanalyzing genitive attributes as first constituents of compounds. The present paper uses corpus data to explore three key stages in this development: In the initial stage, it shows how prenominal non-specific genitive constructions lent themselves to reanalysis due to their functional overlap and formal similarity. Additionally, compounds seem to have replaced not only prenominal genitives, but also structurally different postnominal genitives. In the second stage, the new compounding pattern increases in productivity between 1500 and 1710, especially compared to the older pattern without linking elements. The last stage pertains to changes in spelling practice. It shows that linked compounds were written separately in the beginning. Their gradual graphematic integration into directly connected words was reversed by a century of hyphenation (1650–1750). This is strikingly different from present-day spelling practice and shows that the linked pattern was still perceived as marked.
This paper studies the morphological productivity of German N+N compounding patterns from a diachronic perspective. It argues that the productivity of compounds increases due to syntactic influence from genitive constructions (“improper compounds”) in Early New High German. Both quantitative and qualitative productivity measures are adapted from derivational morphology and tested on compound data from the Mainz Corpus of (Early) New High German (1500–1710).