Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Other (1)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Keywords
- Datenverarbeitung (5) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (5) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (3)
Publisher
"Reproducibility crisis" and "empirical turn" are only two keywords when it comes to providing reasons for research data management. Research data is omnipresent and with the more and more automatic data processing procedures, they become even more important. However, just because new methods require data and produce data, this does not mean that data are easily accessible, reusable or even make a difference in the CV of a researcher, even if a large portion of research goes into data creation, acquisition, preparation, and analysis. In this talk I will present where we find data in the research process, where we may find appropriate support for data management and advocate for a procedure for including it in research publications and resumes.
This presentation relies on work within the BMBF-funded project CLARIN-D. It also builds on work within the German National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) consortium Text+, DFG project number 460033370.
The workshop presents ATHEN 1 (Annotation and Text Highlighting Environment), an extensible desktop-based annotation environment which supports more than just regular annotation. Besides being a general purpose annotation environment, ATHEN supports indexing and querying support of your data as well as the ability to automatically preprocess your data with Meta information. It is especially suited for those who want to extend existing general purpose annotation tools by implementing their own custom features, which cannot be fulfilled by other available annotation environments. On the according gitlab, we provide online tutorials, which demonstrate the use of specific features of ATHEN
Privacy in its many aspects is protected by various legal texts (e.g. the Basic Law, Civil Code, Criminal Code, or even the Law on Copyright in artistic and photographic works (KunstUrhG), which protects image rights). Data protection law, which governs the processing of information about individuals (personal data), also serves to protect their privacy. However, some information referring to the public sphere of an individual’s life (e.g. the fact that X is a mayor of Smallville) may still be considered personal data (see below), and as such fall within the scope of data protection rules. In this sense, data protection laws concern information that is not private.
Therefore, privacy and data protection, although closely related, are distinct notions: one can violate someone else’s privacy without processing his or her personal data (e.g. simply by knocking at one’s door at night, uninvited), and vice versa: one can violate data protection rules without violating privacy.
The following handouts focus exclusively on data protection rules, and specifically on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, please keep in mind that compliance with the GDPR is not the only aspect of protecting privacy of individuals in research projects. Other rules, such as academic ethics and community standards (such as CARE) also need to be observed.
In unserem Beitrag diskutieren wir Aspekte einer Forschungsdateninfrastruktur für den wissenschaftlichen Alltag auf Projektebene und argumentieren für eine Unterstützung von Projekten während der Erfassung und Bearbeitung von Daten, d. h. vor deren endgültiger Veröffentlichung. Dabei differenzieren wir zwischen Projekten, deren primäres Ziel es ist, eine Ressource aufzubauen (ressourcenschaffende Projekte, kurz RP) und solchen, die zur Beantwortung einer konkreten Forschungsfrage Daten sammeln und auswerten (Forschungsprojekte, kurz FP). Wir argumentieren dafür, dass bei den offenkundigen Unterschieden zwischen beiden Projektarten die grundsätzlichen Ansprüche an das alltägliche Forschungsdatenmanagement im Kern sehr ähnlich (wenn auch unterschiedlich akzentuiert und skaliert) sind. Diese Ähnlichkeit rührt nicht zuletzt daher, dass im Rahmen von FP gesammelte Daten in Bezug auf das Projektziel primär Mittel zum Zweck sein mögen, sie jedoch bereits im Arbeitsprozess in unterschiedlichem Maß von unterschiedlichen Beteiligten genutzt werden. Wir gehen konkret auf die Aspekte Datenorganisation und -verwaltung, Metadaten, Dokumentation und Dateiformate und deren Anforderungen in den verschiedenen Projekttypen ein. Schließlich diskutieren wir Lösungsansätze dafür, Aspekte des Forschungsdatenmanagements auch in (kleineren) Forschungsprojekten nicht post-hoc, sondern bereits in der Projektplanung als Teil der alltäglichen Arbeit zu berücksichtigen und entsprechende Unterstützung in der Forschungsinfrastruktur vorzusehen.
This paper presents the application of the <tiger2/> format to various linguistic scenarios with the aim of making it the standard serialisation for the ISO 24615 [1] (SynAF) standard. After outlining the main characteristics of both the SynAF metamodel and the <tiger2/> format, as extended from the initial Tiger XML format [2], we show through a range of different language families how <tiger2/> covers a variety of constituency and dependency based analyses.