Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (39)
- Part of a Book (22)
- Working Paper (2)
- Article (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (64)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (23)
- Annotation (13)
- Computerlinguistik (13)
- Auszeichnungssprache (11)
- Digital Humanities (8)
- XML (6)
- Digitale Sprachressourcen (5)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (5)
- Sprachdaten (5)
- Langzeitarchivierung (4)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (64) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (64) (remove)
Publisher
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (11)
- Extreme Markup Languages Conference (4)
- de Gruyter (4)
- University of Illinois (3)
- University of Oulu (3)
- Lang (2)
- Narr (2)
- Nisaba (2)
- Schöningh (2)
- TEIA Lehrbuch Verlag (2)
L’article intitulé «Traitement de l’information: Spinfo, HKI et humanités numériques - l’expérience de Cologne» présente l’histoire du développement des humanités numériques au sein de l’Université de Cologne. L'institutionnalisation des humanités numériques a commencé encore à l’époque où dans le monde germanophone le périmètre de la discipline était en train d’être défini par les travaux de quelques pionniers. Parmi eux, il convient de souligner le rôle d’Elisabeth Burr, active notamment à Tubingue, Duisbourg, Brême et Leipzig.L’article retrace le développement des humanités numériques à Cologne à partir de leurs débuts dans les années soixante du 20ème siècle, en passant par leur consolidation dans les années quatre-vingt-dix, jusqu’aux deux dernières décennies, quand Cologne est devenu un centre important de cette discipline. Le processus illustre comment une nouvelle discipline scientifique peut s’institutionnaliser au sein d’une université allemande. L’article décrit la perspective de deux domaines fondateurs: le traitement linguistique de l’information (en allemand: Sprachliche Informationsverarbeitung, Spinfo) et le traitement historico-culturel de l’information (en allemand: Historisch Kulturwissenschaftliche Informationsverarbeitung, HKI) et leur synthèse, qui a abouti en 2017 à la création de l’Institut des Humanités Numériques (Digital Humanities), qui aujourd’hui est - du point de vue interne - une composante de la Faculté de Philosophie de l’Université de Cologne et - du point de vue externe - une partie intégrante de la communauté internationale des humanités numériques.
Preface
(2022)
CLARIN stands for “Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure”. In 2012 CLARIN ERIC was established as a legal entity with the mission to create and maintain a digital infrastructure to support the sharing, use, and sustainability of language data (in written, spoken, or multimodal form) available through repositories from all over Europe, in support of research in the humanities and social sciences and beyond. Since 2016 CLARIN has had the status of Landmark research infrastructure and currently it provides easy and sustainable access to digital language data and also offers advanced tools to discover, explore, exploit, annotate, analyse, or combine such datasets, wherever they are located. This is enabled through a networked federation of centres: language data repositories, service centres, and knowledge centres with single sign-on access for all members of the academic community in all participating countries. In addition, CLARIN offers open access facilities for other interested communities of use, both inside and outside of academia. Tools and data from different centres are interoperable, so that data collections can be combined and tools from different sources can be chained to perform operations at different levels of complexity. The strategic agenda adopted by CLARIN and the activities undertaken are rooted in a strong commitment to the Open Science paradigm and the FAIR data principles. This also enables CLARIN to express its added value for the European Research Area and to act as a key driver of innovation and contributor to the increasing number of industry programmes running on data-driven processes and the digitalization of society at large.
Digital research infrastructures can be divided into four categories: large equipment, IT infrastructure, social infrastructure, and information infrastructure. Modern research institutions often employ both IT infrastructure and information infrastructure, such as databases or large-scale research data. In addition, information infrastructure depends to some extent on IT infrastructure. In this paper, we discuss the IT, information, and legal infrastructure issues that research institutions face.
Der vorliegende Band befasst sich mit dem Stand und der Entwicklung von Forschungsinfrastrukturen für die germanistische Linguistik und einigen angrenzenden Bereichen. Einen zentralen Aspekt dabei bildet die Notwendigkeit, Kooperativität in der Wissenschaft im institutionellen Sinne, aber auch in Hinsicht auf die wissenschaftliche Praxis zu organisieren. Dies geschieht in Verbunden als Kooperationsstrukturen, wobei Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachtechnologie miteinander verbunden werden. Als zentraler Forschungsressource kommen dabei Korpora und ihrer Erschließung durch spezielle, linguistisch motivierte Informationssysteme besondere Bedeutung zu. Auf der Ebene der Daten werden durch Annotations- und Modellierungsstandards die Voraussetzung für eine nachhaltige Nutzbarkeit derartiger Ressourcen geschaffen.
In this paper we present an approach to faceted search in large language resource repositories. This kind of search which enables users to browse through the repository by choosing their personal sequence of facets heavily relies on the availability of descriptive metadata for the objects in the repository. This approach therefore informs the collection of a minimal set of metatdata for language resources. The work described in this paper has been funded by the EC within the ESFRI infrastructure project CLARIN.
Formalisierung von Kontext und sprachlichem Wissen mit Prioritisierter Circumscription (VM-Memo 55)
(1994)
Der grammatiktheoretische Anteil des Linguistikstudiums und die damit verbundenen Forschungsfelder in verschiedenen Anwendungsgebieten sind heute an vielen Universitäten "ökumenisch" ausgerichtet. Das soll heißen, dass man sich - als Studierender wie als Wissenschaftler - nicht auf eine theoretische Schule einschwören muss, sondern mit verschiedenen Ansätzen experimentieren kann.
SGML und Linguistik
(1999)
This paper provides a new generation of a markup language by introducing the Freestyle Markup Language (FML). Demands placed on the language are elaborated, considering current standards and discussions. Conception, a grammatical definition, a corresponding object graph and the bi-directional unambiguous transformation between these two congruent representation forms are set up. The result of this paper is a fundamental definition of a completely new markup language, consolidating many deficiency-discourses and experiences into one particular implementation concept, encouraging the evolution of markup.
TEI Feature Structures as a Representation Format for Multiple Annotation and Generic XML Documents
(2009)
Feature structures are mathematical entities (rooted labeled directed acyclic graphs) that can be represented as graph displays, attribute value matrices or as XML adhering to the constraints of a specialized TEI tag set. We demonstrate that this latter ISO-standardized format can be used as an integrative storage and exchange format for sets of multiple annotation XML documents. This specific domain of application is rooted in the approach of multiple annotations, which marks a possible solution for XML-compliant markup in scenarios with conflicting annotation hierarchies. A more extreme proposal consists in the possible use as a meta-representation format for generic XML documents. For both scenarios our strategy concerning pertinent feature structure representations is grounded on the XDM (XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model). The ubiquitous hierarchical and sequential relationships within XML documents are represented by specific features that take ordered list values. The mapping to the TEI feature structure format has been implemented in the form of an XSLT 2.0 stylesheet. It can be characterized as exploiting aspects of both the push and pull processing paradigm as appropriate. An indexing mechanism is provided with regard to the multiple annotation documents scenario. Hence, implicit links concerning identical primary data are made explicit in the result format. In comparison to alternative representations, the TEI-based format does well in many respects, since it is both integrative and well-formed XML. However, the result documents tend to grow very large depending on the size of the input documents and their respective markup structure. This may also be considered as a downside regarding the proposed use for generic XML documents. On the positive side, it may be possible to achieve a hookup to methods and applications that have been developed for feature structure representations in the fields of (computational) linguistics and knowledge representation.
We present an approach on how to investigate what kind of semantic information is regularly associated with the structural markup of scientific articles. This approach addresses the need for an explicit formal description of the semantics of text-oriented XML-documents. The domain of our investigation is a corpus of scientific articles from psychology and linguistics from both English and German online available journals. For our analyses, we provide XML-markup representing two kinds of semantic levels: the thematic level (i.e. topics in the text world that the article is about) and the functional or rhetorical level. Our hypothesis is that these semantic levels correlate with the articles’ document structure also represented in XML. Articles have been annotated with the appropriate information. Each of the three informational levels is modelled in a separate XML document, since in our domain, the different description levels might conflict so that it is impossible to model them within a single XML document. For comparing and mining the resulting multi-layered XML annotations of one article, a Prolog-based approach is used. It focusses on the comparison of XML markup that is distributed among different documents. Prolog predicates have been defined for inferring relations between levels of information that are modelled in separate XML documents. We demonstrate how the Prolog tool is applied in our corpus analyses.
Igel is a small XQuery-based web application for examining a collection of document grammars; in particular, for comparing related document grammars to get a better overview of their differences and similarities. In its initial form, Igel reads only DTDs and provides only simple lists of constructs in them (elements, attributes, notations, parameter entities). Our continuing work is aimed at making Igel provide more sophisticated and useful information about document grammars and building the application into a useful tool for the analysis (and the maintenance!) of families of related document grammars
Digital Text Collections, Linguistic Research Data, and Mashups: Notes on the Legal Situation
(2008)
Comprehensive data repositories are an essential part of practically all research carried out in the digital humanities nowadays. For example, library science, literary studies, and computational and corpus linguistics strongly depend on online archives that are highly sustainable and that contain not only digitized texts but also audio and video data as well as additional information such as metadata and arbitrary annotations. Current Web technologies, especially those that are related to what is commonly referred to as the Web 2.0, provide a number of novel functions such as multiuser editing or the inclusion of third-party content and applications that are also highly attractive for research applications in the areas mentioned above. Hand in hand with this development goes a high degree of legal uncertainty. The special nature of the data entails that, in quite a few cases, there are multiple holders of personal rights (mostly copyright) to different layers of data that often have different origins. This article discusses the legal problems of multiple authorships in private, commercial, and research environments. We also introduce significant differences between European and U.S. law with regard to the handling of this kind of data for scientific purposes.
Grundlage dieses Artikels* 1 ist das Verbundprojekt „Nachhaltigkeit linguistischer Daten“ der drei Sonderforschungsbereiche 441, 538 und 632, dessen Ziel es ist, Lösungen für die nachhaltige Verfügbarkeit der an den SFBs vorhandenen Korpora zu entwickeln. Ein zentraler Aspekt betrifft die Klärung der Rechtslage für die Nutzung und Weitergabe linguistischer Ressourcen, die durch das Urheber- sowie das Datenschutzrecht geschützt sind. Eine als indifferent wahrgenommene rechtliche Situation wird in der Praxis oft als das entscheidende Hindernis für die Weitergabe linguistischer Daten angeführt. Tatsächlich jedoch sind Nutzung und Weitergabe von Daten zu wissenschaftlichen Zwecken normativ geregelt. Problematisch ist oftmals die Einordnung der speziellen linguistischen Daten als Schutzgegenstand sowie die Tatsache, dass an linguistische Daten und Datensammlungen aufgrund ihrer komplexen und vielschichtigen Beschaffenheit durchaus mehrere Urheber Rechte besitzen können, die sich auf verschiedene Inhalte beziehen. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über das geltende Recht sowie die juristischen und natürlichen Personen, die potentiell Rechte an linguistisch aufbereiteten Datenkollektionen besitzen. Es ist nicht Gegenstand dieses Artikels, rechtsverbindliche Aussagen zu treffen, die auf eine Nutzung und Weitergabe jedweder Daten angewandt werden. Der Artikel orientiert sich in seiner Struktur und thematischen Tiefe bewusst nicht an einem juristischen Publikum, sondern beschreibt die Problematik aus geisteswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Zusammen mit einem Überblick über das vom Umgang mit linguistischen Datensammlungen betroffene Recht, das Urheberrechtsgesetz (Abschnitt 1) und das Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (Abschnitt 2), wird in den jeweiligen Abschnitten auch eine Klassifikation der Daten aus juristischer Sicht vorgenommen. Anschließend werden Lösungsansätze vorgestellt, die im Rahmen des o. g. Verbundprojektes erarbeitet werden (Abschnitt 3).
Gegenstand des Workshop-Beitrags ist die Verknüpfung heterogener linguistischer Ressourcen. Eine bedeutende Teilmenge von Ressourcen in der gegenwärtigen linguistischen Forschung und Anwendung besteht zum einen aus XML-annotierten Textdokumenten und zum anderen aus externen Ressourcen wie Grammatiken, Lexika oder Ontologien. Es wird eine Architektur vorgestellt, die eine Integration heterogener Ressourcen erlaubt, wobei die Methoden zur Integration unabhängig von der jeweiligen Anwendung sind und somit verschiedene Verknüpfungen ermöglichen. Eine exemplarische Anwendung der Methodologie ist die Analyse anaphorischer Beziehungen.
Many XML-related activities (e.g. the creation of a new schema) already address issues with different languages, scripts, and cultures. Nevertheless, a need exists for additional mechanisms and guidelines for more effective internationalization (i18n) and localization (l10n) in XML-related contents and processes. The W3C Internationalization Tag Set Working Group (W3C ITS WG) addresses this need and works on data categories, representation mechanisms and guidelines related to i18n and l10n support in the XML realm. This paper describes initial findings from the (W3C ITS WG). Furthermore, the paper discusses how these findings relate to specific schema languages, and complementary technologies like namespace sectioning, schema annotation and the description of processing chains. The paper exemplifies why certain requirements only can be met by a combination of technologies, and discusses these technologies.
The paper discusses two topics: firstly an approach of using multiple layers of annotation is sketched out. Regarding the XML representation this approach is similar to standoff annotation. A second topic is the use of heterogeneous linguistic resources (e.g., XML annotated documents, taggers, lexical nets) as a source for semiautomatic multi-dimensional markup to resolve typical linguistic issues, dealing with anaphora resolution as a case study.
The aim of the paper is twofold. Firstly, an approach is presented how to select the correct antecedent for an anaphoric element according to the kind of text segments in which both of them occur. Basically, information on logical text structure (e.g. chapters, sections, paragraphs) is used in order to select the antecedent life span of a linguistic expression, i.e. some linguistic expressions are more likely to be chosen as an antecedent throughout the whole text than others. In addition, an appropriate search scope for an anaphora expressed by an expression can be defined according to the document structuring elements that include the linguistic expression. Corpus investigations give rise to the supposition that logical text structure influences the search scope of candidates for antecedents. Second, a solution is presented how to integrate the resources used for anaphora resolution. In this approach, multi-layered XML annotation is used in order to make a set of resources accessible for the anaphora resolution system.
In the mid-1990s, the Faculty of Linguistics and Literary-Studies at Bielefeld University began to establish the field Text technology, both in research and education. Text technology is a new field of research on the border of Computational Linguistics and Computational Philology.
This paper focuses on Text technology in academic education. In 2002, Text Technology was introduced as a minor subject for B.A. Programs. It is organized in modules: Module 1 introduces the characteristics of electronic texts and documents, typography, typesetting systems and hypertext. Module 2 introduces one or two programming languages relevant to the field of humanities computing. Markup languages and the principles of information structuring are the main topics of Module 3. The formal fundamentals of computer-based text processing, as formal languages and their grammars, Logics et cetera are subjects of another module. The paper ends with a short description of other Bachelor- and Master-Programs at Bielefeld University which contain text technological themes.
XML-based technologies offer powerful resources for open source applications in the field of e-learning. The paper describes a model of hypertext as interlinked structures that can be intertwined by cross-annotation linking. This infrastructure integrates multiple perspectives and allows creating a personal learning environment. We exemplify the approach in a case study: the Hamlet project. In the course of this project, several German translations of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet have been collected and annotated. Two different annotation layers are used to achieve a cross-linking reference between the various German translations. We will describe the theoretical background of cross-annotation linking and the actual technological implementation of the system. Additionally, we will use the personas method to gain insights into the potential benefit of the system as a personal learning environment.
Linguistische Korpora
(2004)
Making CONCUR work
(2005)
The SGML feature CONCUR allowed for a document to be simultaneously marked up in multiple conflicting hierarchical tagsets but validated and interpreted in one tagset at a time. Alas, CONCUR was rarely implemented, and XML does not address the problem of conflicting hierarchies at all. The MuLaX document syntax is a non-XML syntax that enables multiply-encoded hierarchies by distinguishing different “layers” in the hierarchy by adding a layer ID as a prefix to the element names. The IDs tie all the elements in a single hierarchy together in an “annotation layer”. Extraction of a single annotation layer results in a well-formed XML document, and each annotation layer may be associated with an XML schema. The MuLaX processing model works on the nodes of one annotation layer at a time through Xpath-like navigation. CONCUR lives!
This paper proposes a methodology for querying linguistic data represented in different corpus formats. Examples of the need for queries over such heterogeneous resources are the corpus-based analysis of multimodal phenomena like the interaction of gestures and prosodic features, or syntax-related phenomena like information structure which exceed the expressive power of a tree-centered corpus format. Query languages (QLs) currently under development are strongly connected to corpus formats, like the NITE Object Model (NOM, Carletta et al., 2003) or the Meta-Annotation Infrastructure for ATLAS (MAIA, Laprun and Fiscus, 2002). The parallel development of linguistic query languages and corpus formats is due to the fact that general purpose query languages like XQuery (Boag et al., 2003) do not fulfill the changing needs of linguistically motivated queries, e.g. to give access to (non-)hierarchically organized, theory and language dependent annotations of multi modal signals and/or text. This leads to the problem that existing corpus formats and query languages are hard to reuse. They have to be re developed and re-implemented time-consumingly and expensively for unforeseen tasks. This paper describes an approach for overcoming these problems and a sample application.
This paper describes a corpus of Japanese task-oriented dialogues, i.e. its data, annotations, analysis methodology and preliminary results for the modeling of co-referential phenomena. Current corpus based approaches to co-reference concentrate on textual data from English or other European languages. Hence, the emerging language-general models of co-reference miss input from dialogue data of non-European languages. We aim to fill this gap and contribute to a model of co-reference on various language-specific and language-general levels.
Overlap in markup occurs where some markup structures do not nest, such as where the structural division of the text into lists, sections, etc., differs from the syntactic division of the text into sentences and phrases. The Multiple Annotation solution to this problem (redundant encoding in multiple forms) has many advantages: it is based on XML, the modeling of alternative annotations is possible, each level can be viewed separately, and new levels can be added at any time. But it has the significant disadvantage of independence of the separate files. These multiply annotated files can be regarded as an interrelated unit, with the text serving as the implicit link. Two representations of the information contained in the multiple files (one in Prolog and one in XML) can be programmatically derived and used together for editing, for inference, or for unification of the multiply annotated documents.
Co-reference annotation and resources: a multilingual corpus of typologically diverse languages
(2002)
This article introduces a dialogue corpus containing data from two typologically different languages, Japanese and Kilivila. The corpus is annotated in accordance with language specific annotation schemes for co-referential and similar relations. The article describes the corpus data, the properties of language specific co-reference in the two languages and a methodology for its annotation. Examples from the corpus show how this methodology is used in the workflow of the annotation process.
We describe a general two-stage procedure for re-using a custom corpus for spoken language system development involving a transformation from character-based markup to XML, and DSSSL stylesheet-driven XML markup enhancement with multiple lexical tag trees. The procedure was used to generate a fully tagged corpus; alternatively with greater economy of computing resources, it can be employed as a parametrised ‘tagging on demand’ filter. The implementation will shortly be released as a public resource together with the corpus (German spoken dialogue, about 500k word form tokens) and lexicon (about 75k word form types).
This paper deals with the problem of how to interrelate theory-specific treebanks and how to transform one treebank format to another. Currently, two approaches to achieve these goals can be differentiated. The first creates a mapping algorithm between treebank formats. Categories of a source format are transformed into a target format via a given set of general or language-specific mapping rules. The second relates treebanks via a transformation to a general model of linguistic categories, for example based on the EAGLES recommendations for syntactic annotations of corpora, or relying on the HPSG framework. This paper proposes a new methodology as a solution for these desiderata.