Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (3434)
- Article (2304)
- Book (738)
- Conference Proceeding (512)
- Part of Periodical (283)
- Review (232)
- Doctoral Thesis (65)
- Working Paper (49)
- Other (47)
- Report (21)
Language
- German (6414)
- English (1078)
- Russian (142)
- French (30)
- Portuguese (14)
- Spanish (12)
- Multiple languages (11)
- Italian (8)
- Polish (5)
- Ukrainian (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7727) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (4226)
- Wörterbuch (497)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (479)
- Rezension (383)
- Rechtschreibung (333)
- Konversationsanalyse (314)
- Sprachgeschichte (295)
- Grammatik (274)
- Syntax (257)
- Semantik (236)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2773)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (939)
- Postprint (222)
- Preprint (7)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (4)
- Erstveröffentlichung (4)
- Hybrides Open Access (2)
- Ahead of Print (1)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
- Verlagsveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2781)
- Peer-Review (894)
- Verlags-Lektorat (60)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (36)
- Peer-review (30)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (11)
- Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master, Diplom, Magister) (Bachelor, Master, Diss.) (9)
- Peer-Revied (7)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (4)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (4)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (928)
- de Gruyter (913)
- Schwann (638)
- Narr (446)
- Niemeyer (199)
- Lang (160)
- De Gruyter (130)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (128)
- Narr Francke Attempto (89)
- IDS-Verlag (73)
Our research task consists in the study of the way in which multilingual resources are mobilized in team work within collaborative activities; how they are exploited in a specific way in order both to enhance collaboration and to respect the specificities of the members’ linguistic competences and practices within the team. Central to our analytical work, which is inspired by ethnomethodological conversation analysis, is the relationship between multilingual resources and the situated organization of linguistic uses and of social practices. These two aspects are reflexively articulated, multilingual resources being shaped by the very contexts of their use and activities being constrained and thus structured by the available resources.
L’équipe de Lyon étudie la façon dont les ressources plurilingues sont mobilisées dans des activités collaboratives au sein du travail d’équipe. La démarche analytique est inspirée de l’Analyse Conversationnelle d’emprunte ethnomethodologique, et considère comme centrale la relation entre ressources plurilingues et organisation située des usages linguistiques et des pratiques sociales. Ces deux aspects sont réflexivement articulés, les ressources plurilingues étant modelées par leur contexte d’utilisation, et les activités étant mutuellement contraintes et structurées par les ressources disponibles.
Dieser Artikel schlägt eine Reflexion vor über die möglichen Konvergenzen zwischen einerseits einer linguistischen Betrachtungsweise der wissenschaftlichen Interaktion, welche empfänglich für die „analytische Mentalität“ der ethnomethodologisch beeinflussten Konversationsanalyse ist, und andererseits einer Betrachtungsweise der wissenschaftlichen Praktiken, wie sie von den social studies of science befürwortet wird, zu denen die ethnomethodologischen Untersuchungen der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit auf zentrale Weise beigetragen haben. Die nun folgende Überlegung wird nicht auf abstrakte Art vollzogen werden, sondern auf der Grundlage von empirischen Daten, bei denen es sich um Tonband- und Videoaufnahmen von Interaktionen zwischen Forschern bei der Ausübung ihrer alltäglichen wissenschaftlichen Arbeit handelt. Die analysierten Transkriptionsauszüge werden es uns ermöglichen, die grundsätzlichen Anfangsüberlegungen, die unserer Analysepraxis zugrunde liegen, konkret aufzuzeigen; wir werden unsere Aufmerksamkeit besonders auf diejenigen Methoden lenken, mittels derer die Interaktionspartner eines ersten Sprechers nach der Äußerung seiner Proposition mit dem Gespräch fortfahren, um diese erste Proposition anzunehmen, zu verändern oder abzulehnen. Eine solche empirische Durchmusterung wird es uns erlauben, die Art zu verdeutlichen, wie die interaktionalen Praktiken der Forscher in den Entstehungsprozess des wissenschaftlichen Wissens, in das Erscheinen von Argumenten, Thesen und Ideen eingreifen, die sich entweder durchsetzen und stabilisieren können oder aber die, im Gegenteil, instabil und kontrovers bleiben, d.h. die es schaffen oder umgekehrt es gerade nicht schaffen, sich in Wissensobjekten herauszukristallisieren.
Das Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation (CSI) der Ecole des Mines in Paris ist eine Hochburg der Wissenschaftssoziologie, an der die Arbeiten von Bruno Latour und Michel Callon erstellt wurden. Deren Untersuchungen haben eine Reihe von Analysen der wissenschaftlichen Praktiken ausgelöst, die manchmal – vor allem in der angelsächsischen Literatur – unter dem Begriff „Actor-Network-Theory“ (ANT) zusammengefasst werden. Dieser fundamentale Beitrag zur Wissenschaftssoziologie zeichnet sich aus durch eine gesteigerte Aufmerksamkeit sowohl gegenüber den Praktiken der Wissenschaftler, der „science in action“, den Objekten, den Artefakten und den technischen Vorrichtungen als auch gegenüber den Netzwerken, in denen sich Menschen und Nicht-Menschen zusammenfügen und im Umlauf sind. Eine Gruppe von Forschern des CSI, Madeleine Akrich, Antoine Hennion und Vololona Rabeharisoa, hat freundlicherweise eingewilligt, im folgenden Text sehr frei über die Thematik des vorliegenden ZBBS-Heftes und über die Art und Weise zu diskutieren, in der sie sich in ihren Forschungsfeldern und in ihren Arbeiten gegenüber den Fragen positionieren, die durch die Berücksichtigung der sozialen Interaktionen in wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsvollzügen aufgeworfen werden.
Erzählen multimodal
(2018)
We are witnessing an emerging digital revolution. For the past 25–30 years, at an increasing pace, digital technologies—especially the internet, mobile phones and smartphones—have transformed the everyday lives of human beings. The pace of change will increase, and new digital technologies will become even more tightly entangled in human everyday lives. Artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), 6G wireless solutions, virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (XR), robots and various platforms for remote and hybrid communication will become embedded in our lives at home, work and school.
Digitalisation has been identified as a megatrend, for example, by the OECD (2016; 2019). While digitalisation processes permeate all aspects of life, special attention has been paid to its impact on the ageing population, everyday communication practices, education and learning and working life. For example, it has been argued that digital solutions and technologies have the potential to improve quality of life, speed up processes and increase efficiency. At the same time, digitalisation is likely to bring with it unexpected trends and challenges. For example, AI and robots will doubtlessly speed up or take over many routine-based work tasks from humans, leading to the disappearance of certain occupations and the need for re-education. This, in turn, will lead to an increased demand for skills that are unique to humans and that technologies are not able to master. Thus, developing human competences in the emerging digital era will require not only the mastering of new technical skills, but also the advancement of interpersonal, emotional, literacy and problem-solving skills.
It is important to identify and describe the digitalisation phenomena—pertaining to individuals and societies—and seek human-centric answers and solutions that advance the benefits of and mitigate the possible adverse effects of digitalisation (e.g. inequality, divisions, vulnerability and unemployment). This requires directing the focus on strengthening the human skills and competences that will be needed for a sustainable digital future. Digital technologies should be seen as possibilities, not as necessities.
There is a need to call attention to the co-evolutionary processes between humans and emerging digital technologies—that is, the ways in which humans grow up with and live their lives alongside digital technologies. It is imperative to gain in-depth knowledge about the natural ways in which digital technologies are embedded in human everyday lives—for example, how people learn, interact and communicate in remote and hybrid settings or with artificial intelligence; how new digital technologies could be used to support continuous learning and understand learning processes better and how health and well-being can be promoted with the help of new digital solutions.
Another significant consideration revolves around the co-creation of our digital futures. Important questions to be asked are as follows: Who are the ones to co-create digital solutions for the future? How can humans and human sciences better contribute to digitalisation and define how emerging technologies shape society and the future? Although academic and business actors have recently fostered inclusion and diversity in their co-creation processes, more must be done. The empowerment of ordinary people to start acting as active makers and shapers of our digital futures is required, as is giving voice to those who have traditionally been silenced or marginalised in the development of digital technology. In the emerging co-creation processes, emphasis should be placed on social sustainability and contextual sensitivity. Such processes are always value-laden and political and intimately intertwined with ethical issues.
Constant and accelerating change characterises contemporary human systems, our everyday lives and the environment. Resilience thinking has become one of the major conceptual tools for understanding and dealing with change. It is a multi-scalar idea referring to the capacity of individuals and human systems to absorb disturbances and reorganise their functionality while undergoing a change. Based on the evolving new digital technologies, there is a pressing need to understand how these technologies could be utilised for human well-being, sustainable lifestyles and a better environment. This calls for analysing different scales and types of resilience in order to develop better technology-based solutions for human-centred development in the new digital era.
This white paper is a collaborative effort by researchers from six faculties and groups working on questions related to digitalisation at the University of Oulu, Finland. We have identified questions and challenges related to the emerging digital era and suggest directions that will make possible a human-centric digital future and strengthen the competences of humans and humanity in this era.
Zur Sprachenpolitik der EG
(1991)
Special Issue: Mobile Medienpraktiken im Spannungsfeld von Öffentlichkeit, Privatheit und Anonymität
(2019)
In conversation, turn-taking is usually fluid, with next speakers taking their turn right after the end of the previous turn. Most, but not all, previous studies show that next speakers start to plan their turn early, if possible already during the incoming turn. The present study makes use of the list-completion paradigm (Barthel et al., 2016), analyzing speech onset latencies and eye-movements of participants in a task-oriented dialogue with a confederate. The measures are used to disentangle the contributions to the timing of turn-taking of early planning of content on the one hand and initiation of articulation as a reaction to the upcoming turn-end on the other hand. Participants named objects visible on their computer screen in response to utterances that did, or did not, contain lexical and prosodic cues to the end of the incoming turn. In the presence of an early lexical cue, participants showed earlier gaze shifts toward the target objects and responded faster than in its absence, whereas the presence of a late intonational cue only led to faster response times and did not affect the timing of participants' eye movements. The results show that with a combination of eye-movement and turn-transition time measures it is possible to tease apart the effects of early planning and response initiation on turn timing. They are consistent with models of turn-taking that assume that next speakers (a) start planning their response as soon as the incoming turn's message can be understood and (b) monitor the incoming turn for cues to turn-completion so as to initiate their response when turn-transition becomes relevant.
Speech planning is a sophisticated process. In dialog, it regularly starts in overlap with an incoming turn by a conversation partner. We show that planning spoken responses in overlap with incoming turns is associated with higher processing load than planning in silence. In a dialogic experiment, participants took turns with a confederate describing lists of objects. The confederate’s utterances (to which participants responded) were pre-recorded and varied in whether they ended in a verb or an object noun and whether this ending was predictable or not. We found that response planning in overlap with sentence-final verbs evokes larger task-evoked pupillary responses, while end predictability had no effect. This finding indicates that planning in overlap leads to higher processing load for next speakers in dialog and that next speakers do not proactively modulate the time course of their response planning based on their predictions of turn endings. The turn-taking system exerts pressure on the language processing system by pushing speakers to plan in overlap despite the ensuing increase in processing load.
To ensure short gaps between turns in conversation, next speakers regularly start planning their utterance in overlap with the incoming turn. Three experiments investigate which stages of utterance planning are executed in overlap. E1 establishes effects of associative and phonological relatedness of pictures and words in a switch-task from picture naming to lexical decision. E2 focuses on effects of phonological relatedness and investigates potential shifts in the time-course of production planning during background speech. E3 required participants to verbally answer questions as a base task. In critical trials, however, participants switched to visual lexical decision just after they began planning their answer. The task-switch was time-locked to participants' gaze for response planning. Results show that word form encoding is done as early as possible and not postponed until the end of the incoming turn. Hence, planning a response during the incoming turn is executed at least until word form activation.
Esipuhe/Preface
(2020)
Schriftlich-Mündlich
(1990)
In conversation, speakers need to plan and comprehend language in parallel in order to meet the tight timing constraints of turn taking. Given that language comprehension and speech production planning both require cognitive resources and engage overlapping neural circuits, these two tasks may interfere with one another in dialogue situations. Interference effects have been reported on a number of linguistic processing levels, including lexicosemantics. This paper reports a study on semantic processing efficiency during language comprehension in overlap with speech planning, where participants responded verbally to questions containing semantic illusions. Participants rejected a smaller proportion of the illusions when planning their response in overlap with the illusory word than when planning their response after the end of the question. The obtained results indicate that speech planning interferes with language comprehension in dialogue situations, leading to reduced semantic processing of the incoming turn. Potential explanatory processing accounts are discussed.
Lors de la négociation située de l'alternance des tours de parole en interaction (Sacks, Schegloff et Jefferson, 1974), les participants s'orientent vers la complétude possible des unités de construction de tour. Grâce à une complétion différée d'un tour de parole précédent, un locuteur peut revendiquer son droit à la parole au-delà d'un tour intercalaire d'un autre locuteur. Cet article exploite différentes formes de cette "delayed completion" (Lerner, 1989) en français parlé. À l'aide du cadre théorique de l'Analyse conversationnelle (ten Have, 1999), nous démontrerons que ce procédé ne relève pas uniquement d'une alternance de tour de parole problématique, mais aussi de séquences collaboratives, qui sont en lien étroit avec le phénomène des constructions syntaxiques collaboratives. En s'intéressant à ces structures syntaxiques émergentes, il est possible de démontrer la négociation située et locale - tour par tour – du droit à la parole et de la dynamique de l'alternance des tours en conversation ordinaire. A base d'une collection d'extraits issus d'interactions naturelles enregistrées en audio ou en vidéo, différentes manières de revendiquer ou de partager son tour seront illustrées. Lors des analyses, une attention particulière sera dédiée à quelques phénomènes récurrents dans les séquences de complétion différée. Ainsi, l'exploitation de certaines conjonctions en tant que marqueurs discursifs ou la présence d'allongements vocaliques en fin du premier segment semblent indiquer des co-occurrences de ressources audibles spécifiques à différents types de complétion différée en conversation française.
Alors que de nombreuses études en analyse conversationnelle se sont intéressées à la manière dont des locuteurs co-construisent un tour de parole (notamment sur le plan syntaxique et prosodique), la façon dont la co-construction est ensuite évaluée n'a pas encore été étudiée en profondeur au sein de la littérature interactionniste. Ici, nous étudions deux pratiques permettant à un locuteur de valider une co-construction, à savoir l'acquiescement simple et l'hétéro-répétition de la complétion. En menant une analyse séquentielle et multimodale de plusieurs séquences de co-construction en français, nous montrons qu’à travers ces deux procédés – qui semblent au premier abord similaires dans leur fonctionnement – les locuteurs effectuent une évaluation très différente : tandis que l'acquiescement simple valide la complétion proposée uniquement comme une version possible, l'hétéro-répétition la valide comme étant une complétion complètement adéquate. Cette contribution met en évidence que les interactants exploitent des ressources audibles aussi bien que visibles afin de manifester si et dans quel sens ils acceptent la complétion de leur tour de parole de la part d’un coparticipant. Nous soulignons l’importance d’étudier en détail les différents formatages possibles des tours évaluant une complétion afin de pouvoir distinguer différentes formes « d’acceptation » et de révéler la manière dont les locuteurs peuvent finement négocier leur position en tant que (co-)auteur ou destinataire d’un tour de parole.