Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (207) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (207) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (61)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (28)
- Linguistik (21)
- Germanistik (20)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (18)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (15)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (14)
- Gastwissenschaftler (13)
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte (13)
- Konversationsanalyse (10)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (99)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (10)
- Postprint (5)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (103)
- Verlags-Lektorat (7)
- Peer-Review (5)
- Peer-review (5)
- (Verlags)Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (60)
- De Gruyter (32)
- de Gruyter (32)
- Stauffenburg (12)
- Lang (10)
- Benjamins (5)
- Cambridge Scholars Publ. (4)
- Springer (4)
- Narr (3)
- Olms (3)
Speakers’ dialogical orientation to the particular others they talk to is implemented by practices of recipient-design. One such practice is the use of negation as a means to constrain interpretations of speaker’s actions by the partner. The paper situates this use of negation within the larger context of other recipient-designed uses of negation which negate assumptions the speaker makes about what the addressee holds to be true (second-order assumptions) or what the addressee assumes the speaker holds to be true (third- order assumptions). The focus of the study is on the ways in which speakers use negation to disclaim interpretations of their turns which partners have displayed or may possibly arrive at. Special emphasis is given to the positionally sensitive uses of negation, which may occur before, after or inserted between the nucleus actions whose interpretation is constrained by the negation. Interactional motivations and rhetorical potentials of the practice are pointed out, partly depending on the position of the negation vis-à-vis the nucleus action. The analysis shows that the concept of ‘recipient design’ is in need of distinctions which have not been in focus in prior research.
Cette contribution s’intéresse aux co-constructions d’un tour de parole en interaction, plus spécifiquement, à la manière dont la complétion d’un énoncé de la part d’un co-participant est ensuite réceptionnée par le locuteur dont le tour a été complété. Malgré l’intérêt certain porté par l’analyse conversationnelle et la linguistique interactionnelle à la co-énonciation, l’évaluation de cette pratique par le premier locuteur n’a pas fait l’objet d’analyses approfondies. Dans ce qui suit, nous nous focalisons plus particulièrement sur les pratiques interactionnelles qui permettent aux participants de valider une co-construction. Ce travail est issu du projet ANR SPIM (« L’imitation dans la parole »), dans le cadre duquel nous nous sommes interrogée sur la fonction de l’hétéro-répétition (le fait de répéter un énoncé d’un autre locuteur ou une partie de celui-ci, opposée à l’auto- répétition) dans des séquences de co-construction d’un tour de parole.
Annotating Spoken Language
(2014)
In this paper, we present the concept and the results of two studies addressing (potential) users of monolingual German online dictionaries, such as www.elexiko.de. Drawing on the example of elexiko, the aim of those studies was to collect empirical data on possible extensions of the content of monolingual online dictionaries, e.g. the search function, to evaluate how users comprehend the terminology of the user interface, to find out which types of information are expected to be included in each specific lexicographic module and to investigate general questions regarding the function and reception of examples illustrating the use of a word. The design and distribution of the surveys is comparable to the studies described in the chapters 5-8 of this volume. We also explain, how the data obtained in our studies were used for further improvement of the elexiko-dictionary.