Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (27)
- Conference Proceeding (18)
- Article (6)
- Other (3)
- Working Paper (3)
- Report (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (58) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (21)
- Digital Humanities (18)
- Forschungsdaten (15)
- Sprachdaten (11)
- Infrastruktur (10)
- Computerlinguistik (8)
- Deutsch (6)
- CLARIN (5)
- Forschungsinfrastruktur (5)
- Geisteswissenschaften (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (31)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (17)
- Postprint (4)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (31)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (16)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (6)
- European language resources association (ELRA) (4)
- European Language Resources Association (3)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (3)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (3)
- Universität zu Köln (3)
- Zenodo (3)
- Clarin (2)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
- McGill University & Université de Montréal (2)
We present an approach to an aspect of managing complex access scenarios to large and heterogeneous corpora that involves handling user queries that, intentionally or due to the complexity of the queried resource, target texts or annotations outside of the given user’s permissions. We first outline the overall architecture of the corpus analysis platform KorAP, devoting some attention to the way in which it handles multiple query languages, by implementing ISO CQLF (Corpus Query Lingua Franca), which in turn constitutes a component crucial for the functionality discussed here. Next, we look at query rewriting as it is used by KorAP and zoom in on one kind of this procedure, namely the rewriting of queries that is forced by data access restrictions.
Beyond Citations: Corpus-based Methods for Detecting the Impact of Research Outcomes on Society
(2020)
This paper proposes, implements and evaluates a novel, corpus-based approach for identifying categories indicative of the impact of research via a deductive (top-down, from theory to data) and an inductive (bottom-up, from data to theory) approach. The resulting categorization schemes differ in substance. Research outcomes are typically assessed by using bibliometric methods, such as citation counts and patterns, or alternative metrics, such as references to research in the media. Shortcomings with these methods are their inability to identify impact of research beyond academia (bibliometrics) and considering text-based impact indicators beyond those that capture attention (altmetrics). We address these limitations by leveraging a mixed-methods approach for eliciting impact categories from experts, project personnel (deductive) and texts (inductive). Using these categories, we label a corpus of project reports per category schema, and apply supervised machine learning to infer these categories from project reports. The classification results show that we can predict deductively and inductively derived impact categories with 76.39% and 78.81% accuracy (F1-score), respectively. Our approach can complement solutions from bibliometrics and scientometrics for assessing the impact of research and studying the scope and types of advancements transferred from academia to society.
The present submission reports on a pilot project conducted at the Institute for the German Language (IDS), aiming at strengthening the connection between ISO TC37SC4 “Language Resource Management” and the CLARIN infrastructure. In terminology management, attempts have recently been made to use graph-theoretical analyses to get a better understanding of the structure of terminology resources. The project described here aims at applying some of these methods to potentially incomplete concept fields produced over years by numerous researchers serving as experts and editors of ISO standards. The main results of the project are twofold. On the one hand, they comprise concept networks dynamically generated from a relational database and browsable by the user. On the other, the project has yielded significant qualitative feedback that will be offered to ISO. We provide the institutional context of this endeavour, its theoretical background, and an overview of data preparation and tools used. Finally, we discuss the results and illustrate some of them.
Die durch die Covid-19-Pandemie bedingte Umstellung der Präsenzlehre auf digitale Lehr- und Lernformate stellte Lehrende und Studierende gleichermaßen vor eine Herausforderung. Innerhalb kürzester Zeit musste die Nutzung von Plattformen und digitalen Tools erlernt und getestet werden. Der Beitrag stellt exemplarisch Dienste und Werkzeuge von CLARIAH-DE vor und erläutert, wie die digitale Forschungsinfrastruktur Lehrende und Studierende auch im Rahmen der digitalen Lehre unterstützen kann.
The present paper describes Corpus Query Lingua Franca (ISO CQLF), a specification designed at ISO Technical Committee 37 Subcommittee 4 “Language resource management” for the purpose of facilitating the comparison of properties of corpus query languages. We overview the motivation for this endeavour and present its aims and its general architecture. CQLF is intended as a multi-part specification; here, we concentrate on the basic metamodel that provides a frame that the other parts fit in.
Poster des Text+ Partners Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache Mannheim präsentiert beim Workshop "Wohin damit? Storing and reusing my language data" am 22. Juni 2023 in Mannheim. Das Poster wurde im Kontext der Arbeit des Vereins Nationale Forschungsdateninfrastruktur (NFDI) e.V. verfasst. NFDI wird von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und den 16 Bundesländern finanziert, und das Konsortium Text+ wird gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – Projektnummer 460033370. Die Autor:innen bedanken sich für die Förderung sowie Unterstützung. Ein Dank geht außerdem an alle Einrichtungen und Akteur:innen, die sich für den Verein und dessen Ziele engagieren.
Der Beitrag betrachtet das Deutsche Referenzkorpus DeReKo in Bezug auf Strategien für seinen Ausbau, den Zugriff über die Korpusanalyseplattform KorAP und seine Einbettung in Forschungsinfrastrukturen und in die deutschsprachige und europäische Korpuslandschaft. Ausgehend von dieser Bestandsaufnahme werden Perspektiven zu seiner Weiterentwicklung aufgezeigt. Zu den Zukunftsvisionen gehören die Verteilung von Korpussressourcen und die Konstruktion multilingualer vergleichbarer Korpora anhand der Bestände der National- und Referenzkorpora, eine Plattform zur Abgabe und Aufbereitung von Sprachspenden als eine Anwendung von Citizen Science sowie eine Komponente zur automatischen Identifikation von übersetzten bzw. maschinenverfassten Texten.
Deutsche Geschichte-Digital: Ergebnisse der TEI-Konvertierung und Integration in Pilotprojekten
(2018)
Digital research infrastructures can be divided into four categories: large equipment, IT infrastructure, social infrastructure, and information infrastructure. Modern research institutions often employ both IT infrastructure and information infrastructure, such as databases or large-scale research data. In addition, information infrastructure depends to some extent on IT infrastructure. In this paper, we discuss the IT, information, and legal infrastructure issues that research institutions face.
Ethical issues in Language Resources and Language Technology are often invoked, but rarely discussed. This is at least partly because little work has been done to systematize ethical issues and principles applicable in the fields of Language Resources and Language Technology. This paper provides an overview of ethical issues that arise at different stages of Language Resources and Language Technology development, from the conception phase through the construction phase to the use phase. Based on this overview, the authors propose a tentative taxonomy of ethical issues in Language Resources and Language Technology, built around five principles: Privacy, Property, Equality, Transparency and Freedom. The authors hope that this tentative taxonomy will facilitate ethical assessment of projects in the field of Language Resources and Language Technology, and structure the discussion on ethical issues in this domain, which may eventually lead to the adoption of a universally accepted Code of Ethics of the Language Resources and Language Technology community.