Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (182)
- Article (178)
- Book (55)
- Working Paper (10)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
- Part of Periodical (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Review (3)
- Habilitation (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- German (293)
- English (138)
- French (16)
- Multiple languages (3)
- Polish (1)
Keywords
- Konversationsanalyse (451) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (208)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (62)
- Postprint (48)
- Ahead of Print (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (164)
- Peer-Review (132)
- Peer-review (5)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (4)
- Verlags-Lektorat (2)
- (Verlags-)lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (43)
- Narr (38)
- de Gruyter (30)
- Benjamins (25)
- Lang (14)
- Narr Francke Attempto (14)
- Taylor & Francis (14)
- Elsevier (12)
- Stauffenburg (12)
- Winter (12)
In informal interaction, speakers rarely thank a person who has complied with a request. Examining data from British English, German, Italian, Polish, and Telugu, we ask when speakers do thank after compliance. The results show that thanking treats the other’s assistance as going beyond what could be taken for granted in the circumstances. Coupled with the rareness of thanking after requests, this suggests that cooperation is to a great extent governed by expectations of helpfulness, which can be long-standing, or built over the course of a particular interaction. The higher frequency of thanking in some languages (such as English or Italian) suggests that cultures differ in the importance they place on recognizing the other’s agency in doing as requested.
Drawing on research from conversation analysis and developmental psychology, we point to the existence of “supporters” of morally responsible agency in everyday interaction: causes of our behavior that we are often unaware of, but that would make goodenough reasons for our actions, were we made aware of them.
The present paper explores how rules are enforced and talked about in everyday life. Drawing on a corpus of board game recordings across European languages, we identify a sequential and praxeological context for rule talk. After a game rule is breached, a participant enforces proper play and then formulates a rule with an impersonal deontic statement (e.g. “It’s not allowed to do this”). Impersonal deontic statements express what may or may not be done without tying the obligation to a particular individual. Our analysis shows that such statements are used as part of multi-unit and multi-modal turns where rule talk is accomplished through both grammatical and embodied means. Impersonal deontic statements serve multiple interactional goals: they account for having changed another’s behavior in the moment and at the same time impart knowledge for the future. We refer to this complex action as an “instruction.” The results of this study advance our understanding of rules and rule-following in everyday life, and of how resources of language and the body are combined to enforce and formulate rules.
We examine moments in social interaction in which a person formulates what another thinks or believes. Such formulations of belief constitute a practice with specifiable contexts and consequences. Belief formulations treat aspects of the other person's prior conduct as accountable on the basis that it provided a new angle on a topic, or otherwise made a surprising contribution within an ongoing course of actions. The practice of belief formulations subjectivizes the content that the other articulated and thereby topicalizes it, mobilizing commitment to that position, an account, or further elaboration. We describe how the practice can be put to work in different activity contexts: sometimes it is designed to undermine the other's position as a subjective 'mere belief', at other times it serves to mobilize further topic talk. Throughout, belief formulations show themselves to be a method by which we get to know ourselves and each other as mental agents.
Linguistic relativists have traditionally asked 'how language influences thought', but conversation analysts and anthropological linguists have moved the focus from thought to social action. We argue that 'social action' should in this context not become simply a new dependent variable, because the formulation 'does language influence action' suggests that social action would already be meaningfully constituted prior to its local (verbal and multi-modal) accomplishment. We draw on work by the gestalt psychologist Karl Duncker to show that close attention to action-in-a-situation helps us ground empirical work on cross-cultural diversity in an appreciation of the invariances that make culture-specific elements of practice meaningful.
This article makes an empirical and a methodological contribution to the comparative study of action. The empirical contribution is a comparative study of three distinct types of action regularly accomplished with the turn format du meinst x (“you mean/think x”) in German: candidate understandings, formulations of the other’s mind, and requests for a judgment. These empirical materials are the basis for a methodological exploration of different levels of researcher abstraction in the comparative study of action. Two levels are examined: the (coarser) level of conditionally relevant responses (what a response speaker must do to align with the action of the prior turn) and the (finer) level of “full alignment” (what a response speaker can do to align with the action of a prior turn). Both levels of abstraction provide empirically viable and analytically interesting descriptive concepts for the comparative study of action. Data are in German.
This article makes an empirical and a methodological contribution to the comparative study of action. The empirical contribution is a comparative study of three distinct types of action regularly accomplished with the turn format du meinst x (“you mean/think x”) in German: candidate understandings, formulations of the other’s mind, and requests for a judgment. These empirical materials are the basis for a methodological exploration of different levels of researcher abstraction in the comparative study of action. Two levels are examined: the (coarser) level of conditionally relevant responses (what a response speaker must do to align with the action of the prior turn) and the (finer) level of “full alignment” (what a response speaker can do to align with the action of a prior turn). Both levels of abstraction provide empirically viable and analytically interesting descriptive concepts for the comparative study of action. Data are in German.
This chapter describes the resources that speakers of Polish use when recruiting assistance and collaboration from others in everyday social interaction. The chapter draws on data from video recordings of informal conversation in Polish, and reports language-specific findings generated within a large-scale comparative project involving eight languages from five continents (see other chapters of this volume). The resources for recruitment described in this chapter include linguistic structures from across the levels of grammatical organization, as well as gestural and other visible and contextual resources of relevance to the interpretation of action in interaction. The presentation of categories of recruitment, and elements of recruitment sequences, follows the coding scheme used in the comparative project (see Chapter 2 of the volume). This chapter extends our knowledge of the structure and usage of Polish with detailed attention to the properties of sequential structure in conversational interaction. The chapter is a contribution to an emerging field of pragmatic typology.
This book analyses requests for action on the basis of natural video-recorded data of everyday interaction in British English and Polish families. Jorg Zinken describes in his analyses the features of interactional context that people across cultures might be sensitive to in designing a request, as well as aspects of cultural diversity.
This study analyses the use of the Polish wez- V2 (take-V2) double imperative to request here-and-now actions. The analysis is based on a collection of approximately 40 take-V2 double imperatives, which was built from a corpus of 10 hours of video recordings of everyday interactions (preparing and having meals, playing with children, etc.) taking place in the homes of Polish families. A sequential analysis of these data shows that the take-V2 construction is commonly selected in situations where the request recipient could be expected to already be attending to the relevant business (e.g., because they committed to this earlier in the interaction), but isn’t. By selecting the take-V2 format, the request speaker reanimates the recipient´s responsibility for the matter at hand.
Punkt widzenia (lub angielski odpowiednik point of view) to ważne pojęcie we współczesnej lingwistyce kognitywnej. W artykule tym argumentuję, że pojęcie to jest obecnie używane do oznaczenia jakościowo różnych zjawisk: punktów widzenia utrwalonych na poziomie systemu oraz punktu widzenia mówiącego. Przedstawiam przykłady dla każdego z tych poziomów. Na zakończenie jest podjęta eksplikacja podobieństw i różnic pomiędzy tymi dwoma zastosowaniami pojęcia punkt widzenia. Taka eksplikacja wydaje mi się ważna dla jasności teoretycznych narzędzi lingwistyki kognitywnej.
Im Dialog übernehmen Sprecher fortlaufend Wörter, grammatische Konstruktionen und andere sprachliche Strukturen ihrer Gesprächsteilnehmer. Die vorliegende Studie widmet sich diesem Phänomen der dialogischen Resonanz aus drei verschiedenen Blickwinkeln: aus der Sicht der Dialogischen Syntax von Du Bois, der Kognitiven Grammatik Langackers und der Konstruktionsgrammatik. Anhand von Resonanzsequenzen aus dem österreichischen Parlament wird zunächst die strukturelle und funktionale Breite und Varianz der dialogischen Resonanzherstellung auf verschiedenen sprachlichen Ebenen beleuchtet. In einem zweiten Schritt stehen die der Resonanzherstellung unterliegenden kognitiven Mechanismen im Mittelpunkt. Dabei geht die Studie explizit paradigmenübergreifend vor und kombiniert Methoden der Gesprächsanalyse mit Theorien und Konzepten der Kognitiven Linguistik. In diesem Sinne situiert sich die Studie in dem noch jungen Feld der Interaktionalen Kognitiven Linguistik, deren Potenzial, aber auch deren Grenzen abschließend kritisch diskutiert werden.
Der Beitrag diskutiert - aus der Perspektive sozialer Welten - die Frage des Zusammenhangs zwischen den Deutungsmustern und Wissensbestanden, deren sich Migranten bedienen, und den Formen ihrer sozialen Teilhabe. Die empirische Analyse stützt sich auf „intra-ethnische“ Interaktionsprozesse in der sozialen Welt eines „türkischen“ Fußballvereins in Mannheim. Es wird gezeigt, dass sich im untersuchten Fall ethnische Selbstorganisation und Integration auf spezifische Weise paaren. Zu den Strukturmerkmalen dieser lokalen sozialen Welt zählen insbesondere ihre Einbettung in eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Kontexte und ihre interne Differenzierung. Des Weiteren ist die alltagspragmatische Verwendung "türkischer" Kulturmuster und der universalistische Charakter der symbolischen Legitimationen in der Alltagsphilosophie der Vereinsangehörigen zu nennen. Schließlich ist die Dominanz von Handlungsanforderungen und Deutungen aus der Fußballwelt gegenüber solchen aus dem „ethnischen“ Milieu sowie die Infragestellung der Kategorien „deutsch“ und „türkisch“ kennzeichnend für die untersuchte Sozialwelt.
Looking at gestures as a means for communication, they can serve conversational participants at several levels. As co-speech gestures, they can add information to the verbally expressed content and they can serve to manage turn-taking. In order to look closer at the interplay between these resources in face-to face conversation, we annotated hand gestures, syntactic completion points and the related turn-organisation, and measured the timing of gesture strokes and their lexical/phrasal referent. In a case study on German, we observe the trend that speakers vary less in gesturelexis on- and offsets when keeping the turn after syntactic completions than at speaker changes, backchannel or other locations of a conversation. This indicates that timing properties of non-verbal cues interact with verbal cues to manage turn-taking.
In Studien zu pädiatrischer Interaktion wird immer wieder die niedrige Redebeteiligung der jungen Patient/innen, deren Leiden in den ärztlichen Gesprächen verhandelt werden, herausgestellt. In einigen triadisch-pädiatrischen Erstkonsultationen, die sich in mehreren Punkten signifikant von dyadischen Erstgesprächen unterscheiden, ist allerdings die Beteiligung der Patient/innen deutlich höher. Eine Kombination aus quantitativer und konversationsanalytischer Untersuchung von Erstkonsultationen in der pädiatrischen Praxis zeigt, dass der Aufforderung zur Beschwerdenschilderung dabei eine entscheidende Bedeutung zukommt, weswegen der Formulierung besondere Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt werden sollte. Doch die herausfordernde Situation birgt nicht nur Stolpersteine, sondern kann auch von allen Interaktionspartner/innen als strategisches Mittel eingesetzt werden. Eine interaktive Relevanz haben überdies elterliche Initiativen. An mehreren Beispielen wird gezeigt, welche erheblichen Konsequenzen eine Nicht-Bearbeitung oder eine nicht ausreichende Bearbeitung für die jeweilige Interaktion hat.
In Studien zu pädiatrischer Interaktion wird immer wieder die niedrige Redebeteiligung der jungen Patient/innen, deren Leiden in den ärztlichen Gesprächen verhandelt werden, herausgestellt. In einigen triadisch-pädiatrischen Erstkonsultationen, die sich in mehreren Punkten signifikant von dyadischen Erstgesprächen unterscheiden, ist allerdings die Beteiligung der Patient/innen deutlich höher. Eine Kombination aus quantitativer und konversationsanalytischer Untersuchung von Erstkonsultationen in der pädiatrischen Praxis zeigt, dass der Aufforderung zur Beschwerdenschilderung dabei eine entscheidende Bedeutung zukommt, weswegen der Formulierung besondere Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt werden sollte. Doch die herausfordernde Situation birgt nicht nur Stolpersteine, sondern kann auch von allen Interaktionspartner/innen als strategisches Mittel eingesetzt werden. Eine interaktive Relevanz haben überdies elterliche Initiativen. An mehreren Beispielen wird gezeigt, welche erheblichen Konsequenzen eine Nicht-Bearbeitung oder eine nicht ausreichende Bearbeitung für die jeweilige Interaktion hat.