Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Dank (1)
- Entwicklungspsychologie (1)
- Ethnolinguistik (1)
- Fragesatz (1)
- Interaktion (1)
- Interaktionsanalyse (1)
- Kontrastive Pragmatik (1)
- Konversationsanalyse (1)
- Polnisch (1)
- assistance (1)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
Gratitude is argued to have evolved to motivate and maintain social reciprocity among people, and to be linked to a wide range of positive effects—social, psychological and even physical. But is socially reciprocal behaviour dependent on the expression of gratitude, for example by saying ‘thank you’ as in English? Current research has not included cross-cultural elements, and has tended to conflate gratitude as an emotion with gratitude as a linguistic practice, as might appear to be the case in English. Here, we ask to what extent people express gratitude in different societies by focusing on episodes of everyday life where someone seeks and obtains a good, service or support from another, comparing these episodes across eight languages from five continents. We find that expressions of gratitude in these episodes are remarkably rare, suggesting that social reciprocity in everyday life relies on tacit understandings of rights and duties surrounding mutual assistance and collaboration. At the same time, we also find minor cross-cultural variation, with slightly higher rates in Western European languages English and Italian, showing that universal tendencies of social reciprocity should not be equated with more culturally variable practices of expressing gratitude. Our study complements previous experimental and culture-specific research on gratitude with a systematic comparison of audiovisual corpora of naturally occurring social interaction from different cultures from around the world.
Drawing on research from conversation analysis and developmental psychology, we point to the existence of “supporters” of morally responsible agency in everyday interaction: causes of our behavior that we are often unaware of, but that would make goodenough reasons for our actions, were we made aware of them.