Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (33)
- Article (21)
- Book (8)
Keywords
- Wörterbuch (62) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (36)
- Peer-Review (7)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
- Verlagslektorat (1)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (62) (remove)
Seit 1996 ist das Amtliche Regelwerk zur deutschen Rechtschreibung (einschließlich Amtlichem Wörterverzeichnis) gültig. Es regelt die Orthografie für Behörden und Schulen in Deutschland sowie in den sechs weiteren Mitgliedsländern des Rats für deutsche Rechtschreibung. Für die Wörterbuchverlage bzw. alle Wörterbuchprojekte gilt es, dieses hoch abstrakte Regelwerk einerseits auf alle Einträge in den A–Z-Teilen der Wörterbücher anzuwenden und andererseits ggf. das Regelwerk selbst zu „übersetzen“ und es damit einer breiten Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen.
Die Anforderungen an gegenwartssprachliche Wörterbücher beinhalten, bei der Aufbereitung der lexikalischen Informationen in Stichwortartikeln die lemmabezogenen Korrektschreibungen adäquat zu berücksichtigen. Die dazugehörigen Arbeitsgänge in der Redaktion des Digitalen Wörterbuchs der deutschen Sprache (DWDS) reichen von der Ansetzung der Nennformen in allen ggf. zulässigen orthographischen Varianten über die Anlage von Verweisen auf die einschlägige Bezugsnorm bis zur Dokumentation ausgewählter Korpusbelege mit gebrauchsfrequenten Abweichungs- und Falschschreibungen. Als besondere Herausforderungen für die lexikographische Praxis erweisen sich regelmäßig Lücken und Interpretationsspielräume in der amtlichen Regelung sowie die bei Belegrecherchen in den DWDS-Textquellen zutage tretenden Diskrepanzen zwischen orthographischer Norm und Schreibusus.
The internationally renowned conference of the European Association for Lexicography (EURALEX) has taken place every two years for the past 39 years. Last year’s conference, held July 12th–16th, 2022, marked EURALEX’s 20th edition, and more than 200 international participants gathered at Mannheim Palace to discuss current developments, learn about new projects, and present their own work — either in lexicography or in one of the many applied or neighboring disciplines such as corpus and computational linguistics.
In the present contribution, I investigate if and how the English and French editions of the Wiktionary collaborative dictionary can be used as a corpus for real time neology watch. This option is envisaged as a stopgap, when no satisfactory corpus is available. Wiktionary can also prove useful in addition to standard corpus analysis, to minimize the risk of overlooking new coinages and new senses. Since the collaborative dictionary’s quest for exhaustiveness makes the manual inspection of the new additions unreasonable (more than 31,000 English lemmas and 11,000 French lemmas entered the nomenclature in 2020), identifying the possibly relevant headwords is an issue. The solution proposed here is to use Wiktionary revision history to detect the (new or existing) entries that received the greatest number of modifications. The underlying hypothesis is that the most heavily edited pages can help identify the vocabulary related to “hot topics”, assuming that, in 2020, the pandemic-related vocabulary ranks high. I used two measures introduced by Lih (2004), whose aim was to estimate the quality of Wikipedia articles: the so-called rigour (number of edits per page) and diversity (number of unique contributors per page). In the present study, I propose to adapt the rigour and diversity metrics to Wiktionary in order to identify the pages that generated a particular stir, rather than to estimate the quality of the articles. I do not subscribe to the idea that – in Wiktionary – more revisions necessarily produce quality articles (more revisions often produce complete articles). I therefore adopt Lih’s notion of diversity to refer to the number of distinct contributors, but leave out the name rigour when it comes to the number of revisions. Wolfer and Müller-Spitzer (2016) used the two metrics to describe the dynamics of the German and English editions of Wiktionary. One of their findings was that the number of edits per page is correlated with corpus word frequencies. The variation in number of page edits should therefore reflect to some extent the variation of corpus word frequencies. Renouf (2013) established a relationship between the fluctuation of word frequencies in a diachronic corpus and various neological processes. In particular, she illustrated how specific events generate sudden frequency spikes for words previously unseen in the corpus. For instance, Eyjafjallajökull, the – existing – name of an Icelandic glacier, appeared in the corpus when the underlying volcano erupted in 2010 and disrupted air traffic in Europe. In order to check if the same phenomenon occurs when using Wiktionary edits instead of corpus frequencies, I manually annotated the most frequently revised entries (according to various ranking scores) with the binary tag: “related to Covid-19” (yes/no). The annotations were then used to test the ability of various configurations to detect relevant headwords from the English and French Wiktionary, namely Covid-19 neologisms and related existing words that deserve updates.
This paper presents the main issues connected with the creation of a trilingual Hungarian-Italian-English dictionary of the COVID-19 pandemic using Lexonomy. My aim is not only to create a coronacorpus (in Hungarian, I propose my own corona-neologism or ‘coroneologism’: koronakorpusz) and a dictionary of equivalents, but also to understand how the different waves and phases of the COVID-19 pandemic are changing the Hungarian language, detect the Corona-, COVID-, pandemic-, virus-, mask-, quarantine-, and vaccine-related neologisms, and offer an overview of the most frequent or linguistically interesting Hungarian neologisms and multiword units related to COVID-19.
This article has a double objective. First, it seeks to offer an initial approach, with critical notes, to the group of pandemic-related neologisms incorporated into the DLE in the year 2020. To that end, the trends in the academic dictionary’s incorporation of neologisms will be reviewed, focusing in particular on specialized language neologisms. Second, the article presents the design of a research study that allows for the examination of any new words beginning with CORONA- added to the DLE and the DHLE. An assessment will be made of the particularities of the DLE and the DHLE regarding the incorporation of the new words, as well as the degree of correspondence or complementarity between the two works in this sense. This will show the complementary roles that the DLE and the DHLE are currently acquiring. In this sense, the new additions open up a debate on the treatment of neologisms in academic lexicography, in a particularly unique scenario.
This paper focuses on standardological and lexicographical aspects of Coronavirus-related neologisms in Croatian. The presented results are based on corpus analysis. The initial corpus for this analysis consists of terms collected for the Glossary of Coronavirus. This corpus has been supplemented by terms we collected on the Internet and from the media. The General Croatian corpora: Croatian Web Corpus – hrWaC (cf. Ljubešić/Klubička 2016) and Croatian Language Repository (cf. Brozović Rončević/Ćavar 2008: 173–186) were also used, but since they do not include neologisms that entered the language after 2013, they could be used only to check terms in the language before that time. From October 2021, a specialized Corona corpus compiled by Štrkalj Despot and Ostroški Anić (2021) became publicly available on request. The data from these corpora are analyzed by Sketch Engine (cf. Kilgarriff et al. 2004: 105–116), a corpus query system loaded with the corpora, enabling the display of lexeme context through concordances and (differential) word sketches and the extraction of keywords (terms) and N-grams. The most common collocations are sorted into syntactic categories. For English equivalents, in addition to the sources found on the Internet, enTenTen2020 corpus was consulted. In the second part of the paper, we analyze and compare the presentation of Coronavirus terminology in the descriptive Glossary of Coronavirus and the normative Croatian Web Dictionary – Mrežnik.
Within the scope of the project "Study and dissemination of COVID-19 terminology", the study reported here aims to detect, analyse and discuss the characteristics of COVID-19 terminology, in particular the role of the adjective novo [new] in this terminology, the high recurrence of terms in the plural and the resemantization of some of the terminological units used. The present paper also discusses how these characteristics influenced the choices that have guided the creation of the proposed dictionary. This paper presents, therefore, the results of the analyses of these aspects, starting with a discussion of the relation between terminology and neology and arriving at the characteristic aspects of the macrostructural and microstructural choices about which some considerations were made.
While adjusting to the COVID-19 pandemic, people around the world started to talk about the “new normal” way of life, and they conveyed feelings and thoughts on the topic through social networks and traditional communication channels resorting to a set of specific linguistic strategies, such as metaphors and neologisms. The vocabulary in different domains and in everyday speech was expanded to accommodate a complex social, cultural, and professional phenomenon of changes. Therefore, this new life gave birth to a new language – the “coronaspeak”. According to Thorne (2020), the “coronaspeak” has three stages: first, it emerged in the way medical aspects were communicated in everyday language; secondly, it occurred when speakers verbalized the experiences they had undergone and “invented their own terms”; finally, this “new” way of speaking emerged in the government and authorities’ jargon, to ensure that the new rules and policies were understood, and that population adopted socially responsible behaviours.
In this paper, we will focus on the second stage, because we intend to take stock of how speakers communicate and verbalize this new way of living, particularly on social networks, for example. Alongside, we are interested in the context in which the neologism – be it a new word, a new meaning, or a new use – emerged, is used, and understood, through the observation of the occurrence of the new word(s) either on social networks or through dissemination texts (press) to confront it with the ones that Portuguese digital dictionaries have attested so far. Different criteria regarding the insertion of new units, the inclusion date, and the lexicographic description of the entries in the dictionaries will be debated.
Between January 2020 and July 2021, many new words and phrases contributed to the expansion of the German vocabulary to enable communication under the new conditions that evolved during the Covid-19 pandemic. Medical and epidemiological vocabulary was integrated into the general language to a large extent. Suddenly, some lexemes from general language were used with very high frequency, while other words were used less often than before. These processes of language change can be studied in various ways, for example, in corpus linguistics with respect to the frequency or emergence of certain words in certain types of texts (e.g. press releases vs. posts in social media), in critical discourse analysis with respect to certain participants of the discourse (e.g. vocabulary of Covid-19 pandemic deniers), or in conversation analysis (e.g. with respect to new verbal interactions in greetings and farewells). The rapid expansion of vocabulary has notably affected also lexicography as a discipline of applied linguistics.
This article will focus on the ways in which a German neologism dictionary project has chosen to capture and document lexicographic information in a timely manner. Both challenges and advantages arise from lexicographic practice “at the pulse of time”. The Neologismenwörterbuch is presented as an example that lends itself well to such a discussion because its subject (neologisms) is characterized as new, innovative, and constantly changing.
This volume of Lexicographica : Series Maior focuses on lexicographic neology and neological lexicography concerning COVID-19 neologisms, featuring papers originally presented at the third Globalex Workshop on Lexicography and Neology (GWLN 2021).
The thirteen papers in this volume focus on ten languages: one Altaic (Korean), one Finno-Ugric (Hungarian), two Germanic (English and German), four Romance (French, Italian, [Brazilian and European] Portuguese and [Pan-American and European] Spanish), and one Slavic (Croatian), as well as the Sign Language of New Zealand. Specialized dictionaries of neologisms are discussed as well as general language ones, monolingual, bilingual and multilingual lexical resources, print and electronic dictionaries. Questions regarding terminology as well as general language and standard and norm regarding COVID-19 neologisms are raised and different methods of detecting candidates in media corpora, as well as by user contributions, are discussed.
This volume brings together contributions by international experts reflecting on Covid19-related neologisms and their lexicographic processing and representation. The papers analyze new words, new meanings of existing words, and new multiword units, where they come from, how they are transmitted (or differ) across languages, and how their use and meaning are reflected in dictionaries of all sorts. Recent trends in as many as ten languages are considered, including general and specialized language, monolingual as well as bilingual and printed as well as online dictionaries.
The syntagma gel hidroalcohólico ‘hydroalcoholic gel’ or the noun hidroalcohol ‘hydroalcohol’ cannot be found in Diccionario de la lengua española (DLE) of the Real Academia Española (‘Royal Spanish Academy’) or other general reference dictionaries of the Spanish language. This is so despite the fact that, for well over a year and to this very day, we have not been able to do anything without first sanitising our hands with this product. It is one of the many neologisms that the COVID-19 pandemic has brought us, and these have become commonly used words that dictionaries should consider as candidates for future updates.
By looking at the dictionarisability of these neologisms, in this work we try to set their boundaries on the continuum along which they fall. “Dictionarisability” means, in our context, the greater or lesser interest of these unities regarding the updating of general language dictionaries. At both ends of this continuum, there are surprising nonce words, as well as neologisms that have recently lost their status as such because they have now been incorporated into the dictionary. To identify different groups on the continuum of pandemic neologisms, we take into account the criteria proposed in the current literature and, by so doing, we are able to assess the extent to which they are discriminatory. This will allow us to address the neological process and to reflect on the various stages of it, from the time a neologism is born until the moment it ceases to be one because it has been dictionarised. Before that, however, we present the framework of our study and refer to the mechanisms available for detecting neologisms in general and pandemic neologisms in particular.
The aim of this work is to describe criteria used in the process of inclusion and treatment of neologisms in dictionaries of Spanish within the framework of pandemic instability. Our starting point will be data obtained by the Antenas Neológicas Network (https://www.upf.edu/web/antenas), whose representation in three different lexicographic tools will be analyzed with the purpose of identifying problems in the methodology used to dictionarize – that is, how and what words were selected to be included in dictionaries and how they were represented in their entries – neologisms during the COVID-19 pandemic (sources and corpora of analysis, selection criteria, types of definition, among other aspects). Two of them are monolingual and COVID-19 lexical units were included as part of their updates: the Antenario, a dictionary of neologisms of Spanish varieties, and the Diccionario de la Lengua Española [DLE], a dictionary of general Spanish, published by the Real Academia Española [RAE], Spanish Royal Academy). The other is a bilingual unidirectional English-Spanish dictionary first published as a glossary, Diccionario de COVID-19 EN-ES [TREMEDICA], entirely made up of neological and non-neological lexical units related to the virus and the pandemic. Thus, the target lexis was either included in existing works or makes up the whole of a new tool located in a portal together with other lexicographic tools. Unlike other collections of COVID-19 vocabulary that kept cropping up as the pandemic unfolded, all three have been designed and written according to well-established lexicographic practices.
Our working hypothesis is that the need to record and define words which were recently created impacts the criteria for inclusion and treatment of neologisms in dictionaries about Spanish, including a certain degree of overlap of some features which are traditionally thought to be specific to each type of dictionary.
Wissenschaftlich basierte allgemeine Wörterbücher des Deutschen werden heute meist korpusbasiert erarbeitet, d. h. die in ihnen beschriebene Sprache wird vor der lexikografischen Beschreibung empirisch erforscht. Diese Korpora sind allerdings, wie die großen linguistischen Textsammlungen zum Deutschen allgemein, durch Zeitungstexte dominiert. Daher beruhen die in Wörterbüchern beschriebenen Kollokationen und typischen Verwendungskontexte zumindest teilweise auf dieser Textsorte. Wir untersuchen in unserem Beitrag anhand einer Fallstudie zu Mann und Frau, wie stark sich die Beschreibung solcher Kollokationssets ändern würde, wenn als Korpusgrundlage nicht Zeitungen, sondern Publikumszeitschriften oder belletristische Texte herangezogen würden und wie unterschiedlich demnach Geschlechterstereotype dargestellt würden. Damit diskutieren wir auch die Frage, ob Zeitungstexte in diesem Fall ein adäquates und vielseitiges Abbild des Gebrauchsstandards zeigen. Auf einer allgemeineren Ebene wird dadurch ein grundlegendes Problem korpuslinguistischer Forschungsarbeiten tangiert, nämlich die Frage, inwieweit durch Korpora überhaupt ein ‚objektives‘ Bild der sprachlichen Wirklichkeit gezeichnet werden kann.
Dictionary usage research views dictionaries primarily as tools for solving linguistic problems. A large proportion of dictionary use now takes place online and can thus be easily monitored using tracking technologies. Using the data gathered through tracking usage data, we hope to optimize user experiences of dictionaries and other linguistic resources. Usage statistics are also used for external evaluation of linguistic resources. In this paper, we pursue the following three questions from a quantitative perspective: (1) What new insights can we gain from collecting and analysing usage data? (2) What limitations of the data and/or the collection process do we need to be aware of? (3) How can these insights and limitations inform the development and evaluation of linguistic resources?
Das ZDL-Regionalkorpus umfasst Zeitungsartikel aus Lokal- und Regionalressorts deutschsprachiger Tageszeitungen. Es dient als empirische Grundlage für die lexikografische Beschreibung der diatopischen Variation im Digitalen Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (DWDS). Darüber hinaus steht es allen angemeldeten Nutzern der DWDS-Korpusplattform für die Recherche zur Verfügung. Die Abfrage kann auf bestimmte diatopische Areale oder diachrone Zeiträume beschränkt werden. Die Verteilung der Treffer über Areale und Zeiträume lässt sich in verschiedener Form darstellen; dabei werden neben absoluten Trefferzahlen auch normalisierte PPM-Werte ausgegeben.
In this paper we present the results of a survey conducted among students of German Philology at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań in the years 2015–2017. The target group was composed of first-semester students from whom we collected data about their lexicographical competence at the start of the program. The results contain some interesting findings, e.g. students prefer online dictionaries, but the number of students using print dictionaries is comparable and we have also observed the rising number of students who use smartphone applications. The aim of the survey is to provide information for university instructors who teach German as a foreign language (DaF) and lexicography.
Der Beitrag versucht zunächst, den linguistischen Beschreibungsgegenstand ‚Umgangssprache‘ auf der Grundlage der neueren Forschungen hierzu näher zu spezifizieren. Es geht dabei um die Frage, welche sprachlichen Erscheinungen als ‚umgangssprachlich‘ bewertet werden und wie ‚Umgangssprache‘ allgemein definiert wird. Daraus resultiert die Feststellung, daß hierüber in der Forschung kein Konsens besteht und der Terminus ‚Umgangssprache‘ durchaus mehrdeutig verwendet wird. Dieser Tatbestand wirkt sich unmittelbar auf die lexikographische Praxis aus. Hier fehlt es an einem klaren Konzept der zu differenzierenden Stilschichten, hier mangelt es auch an einheitlichen Markierungskriterien und an einer einheitlichen Markierungspraxis. Divergenzen werden erklärt als Folge zwangsläufig empirischer, auf dem Sprachgefühl des einzelnen Lexikographen beruhender Zuordnungen. Am Beispiel des Deutschen Universalwörterbuches und anderer allgemeiner Wörterbücher des Gegenwartsdeutschs wird gezeigt, welche umgangssprachlichen Elemente im Wörterbuch überhaupt behandelt werden und welche Schwierigkeiten es insbesondere im Hinblick auf die regionale Gebundenheit umgangssprachlicher lexikalischer Einheiten gibt.
In the past two decades, more and more dictionary usage studies have been published, but most of them deal with the question what users appreciate about dictionaries, which dictionaries they use and which information they need in specific situations. These studies presuppose that users indeed consult lexicographic resources. However, language teachers and lecturers of linguistics often have the impression that students use too few high-quality dictionaries in their every-day work. Against this background, we started an international cooperation project to collect empirical data evaluating that impression. Our aim was to evaluate what students (here from the Romance language area) actually do when they correct language problems. We used a new methodological setting to do this (screen recording with a thinking-aloud task). The empirical data we gained offers a broad insight into what language users really do when solving language-related tasks today.
Im Jahr 2015 ist die 7. Auflage des Duden-Aussprachewörterbuchs erschienen, für deren Bearbeitung erstmals die MitarbeiterInnen des IDS Projekts „Gesprochenes Deutsch“ verantwortlich zeichneten. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die konzeptionellen und inhaltlichen Veränderungen beschrieben, die in der Neuauflage umgesetzt wurden. Sie lassen sich im Wesentlichen unter dem Motto „Hinwendung zur Deskriptivität“ zusammenfassen. Neben den üblichen lexikografischen Prozeduren wie der Streichung veralteter Lemmata und der Erweiterung des Lemmabestands um bisher nicht dokumentierte Wörter sind zunächst im Einleitungsteil Kapitel ergänzt, vollständig überarbeitet oder völlig neu erstellt worden. Systematische Veränderungen wurden bei verschiedenen Transkriptionskonventionen vorgenommen (z.B. bei der Notation der Diphthonge). Die wesentlichste Neuerung ist jedoch die Einbeziehung von empirischen Daten zum deutschen Gebrauchsstandard vor allem aus dem Projektkorpus „Deutsch heute“, die es ermöglicht haben, fundierte Angaben zur regionalen Verbreitung von Aussprachevarianten zu machen.
Den Wortschatz einer Sprache auf hohem Niveau zu dokumentieren und in all seinen Eigenschaften zu beschreiben, ist gleichermaßen wichtig wie schwierig. Verschiedene Gründe haben dazu geführt, dass die Tradition der großen Wörterbücher derzeit zusammenbricht. An ihre Stelle werden in der Zukunft flexibel handhabbare digitale lexikalische Systeme treten.
Es gibt triftige theoretische und praktische Gründe — wir werden im Weiteren auf sie eingehen —, die Diskussion um die Funktion von Rechtschreibwörterbüchern und um ihre Gestaltung in Bezug auf das Deutsche zu führen. Das Erscheinen der „20., völlig neu bearbeitete[n] und erweiterte] Auflage“ der „Rechtschreibung der deutschen Sprache“ (Dudenverlag Mannheim/Leipzig/Wien/Zürich 1991) ist der äußere Anlass, um diese Diskussion in der ZGL zu eröffnen.
This survey describes the practice of dictionary criticism in German philological periodicals. It focuses on reviews of general dictionaries of contemporary German as well as of historical dictionaries of German. Our results show that only a few reference works are reviewed by only a small group of reviewers, and different volumes of dictionaries are not necessarily reviewed systematically. On the criteria for the selection of the reviewed dictionaries one can only speculate. All in all, this rather unsystematic review practice can be interpreted as a disregard of the work of lexicographers, as a neglect of the interests of potential dictionary users, and as a sad disinterest of philologists in lexicographic work.
Rund 700 Neologismen werden in diesem ersten größeren Neologismenwörterbuch für das Deutsche dargestellt. Bei ihnen handelt es sich um neue Wörter, neue Bedeutungen von Wörtern und neue feste Wortverbindungen, die in den 90er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts in die Allgemeinsprache eingegangen sind. Ziel ist es, den allgemein großen Informationsbedarf in Bezug auf neuen Wortschatz zu befriedigen. Präsentiert werden rund 700 Neologismen, d.h. Neulexeme (z.B. Eurowährung) Neubedeutungen (z.B. surfen) und Neuphraseologismen (z.B. im grünen Bereich), die in den 90er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts in die deutsche Allgemeinsprache eingegangen sind. Das erste größere, nach Prinzipien der wissenschaftlichen Lexikographie erarbeitete Neologismenwörterbuch für das Deutsche will den Informationsbedarf, der gemeinhin in Bezug auf neuen Wortschatz besteht, befriedigen. Um dies zu erreichen, wurden für eine ausführliche deskriptive und auf umfangreichen Textkorpora fußende Beschreibung der Neologismen z.T. neue Datentypen und Präsentationsformen gewählt, die die in der Lexikographie bekannten in sinnvoller Weise ergänzen und bereichern.
Die Autoren, erfahrene Lexikographen, arbeiten seit längerem auf dem Gebiet der Neologismenforschung.
Wörterbuchvorwörter
(1989)
Der Beitrag will mit einem lexikologisch-lexikografischen Projekt des IDS bekannt machen, in dem seit 1997 Neulexeme und Neubedeutungen der Neunzigerjahre erforscht werden, soweit sie sich im allgemeinsprachlichen Teil des Wortschatzes der deutschen Standardsprache etabliert haben. Das Ziel des Projektes ist die lexikografische Beschreibung und Dokumentation von rund 1000 ausgewählten Neologismen. Dieses Unternehmen ist zugleich Pilotprojekt für die Präsentation lexikografischer Informationen als elektronische Datenbank im Rahmen des im Aufbau befindlichen lexikalisch-lexikologischen, korpusbasierten Informationssystems LEKSIS des IDS. Erste Arbeitserfahrungen mit diesem System werden anhand des Beispiels Shareholdervalue mitgeteilt.
The development of user-adapted views of lexicographic data is frequently in demand by dictionary research on electronic reference works and hypertext information systems. In the printed dictionary it has been indispensable to develop a complete dictionary relative to a user group and using situations. In contrast, for any electronic presentation of lexicographic data there are possibilities to define user-specific views of an initially user-unspecific resource. However, research on the use of dictionaries in general, still has to answer several open questions as far as this subject is concerned. This paper will firstly provide an overview of the present state of research on dictionary use with respect to electronic lexicography. Subsequently, explanations of further prerequisites for a possible user-adapted access to data are followed, as exemplified by OWID, the Online Vocabulary Information System of the Institut für Deutsche Sprache. Finally, it will be outlined what results on the subject have been accomplished so far. Also the prospects of potential user-adapted presentations of lexicographic data will be highlighted.
In diesem Papier wird kurz der Stand der lexikografischen Theorie und Praxis bezüglich des Themas „Illustrationen in der Lexikografie“ zusammengefasst, um daraus Vorschläge für den Umgang mit Illustrationen in elexiko abzuleiten. Dazu wird zunächst Grundsätzliches zum Thema referiert, um dann Arten von Illustrationen vorzustellen, wie sie in der lexikografischen Theorie unterschie-den werden. Anhand von Beispielen wird dabei die lexikografische Praxis aus dem Bereich der Printlexikografie illustriert. Die letzten beiden Abschnitte beschäftigen sich mit den Möglichkeiten der Illustrierung für elexiko, wobei unterschieden wird in die Illustrierung des Demonstrationswortschatzes und in weitere Perspektiven für elexiko.
In diesem Beitrag geht es einerseits um eine Definition dessen, was korpusgestützte Lexikographie ist, und andererseits um eine Bestandsaufnahme der gegenwärtigen Praxis korpusgestützter Lexikographie. Dabei wird ein Schwerpunkt gelegt auf allgemeinsprachige Wörterbücher der Gegenwartssprache, deren Inhalt die Beschreibung von Bedeutung und Verwendung von Lexemen ist. Außerdem liegt die Einschätzung zugrunde, dass die Auswertung elektronischer Korpora die Wörterbucharbeit weitgehend positiv beeinflusst und verändert, vorausgesetzt, dass zugrunde gelegte Korpus wurde für das geplante Wörterbuch so gut wie möglich in Umfang und Zusammensetzung eingerichtet.
This article presents empirical findings about what criteria make for a good online dictionary, using data on expectations and demands collected in an online questionnaire (N~684), complemented by additional results from a second questionnaire (N-390) which looked more closely at whether respondents had differentiated views on individual aspects of the criteria rated in the first study. Our results show that the classical criteria of reference books (such as reliability and clarity) were rated highest by our participants, whereas the unique characteristics of online dictionaries (such as multimedia and adaptability) were rated and ranked as (partly) unimportant. To verify whether or not the poor ratings of these innovative features were a result of the fact that our subjects are unfamiliar with online dictionaries incorporating such features, we incorporated an experiment into the second study. Our results revealed a learning effect: participants in the learning-effect condition, i.e. respondents who were first presented with examples of possible innovative features of online dictionaries, judged adaptability and multimedia to be more useful than participants who were not given that information. Thus, our data point to the conclusion that developing innovative features is worthwhile but that it should be borne in mind that users can only be persuaded of their benefits gradually. In addition, we present data about questions relating to the design of online dictionaries.
Das Wörterbuch im Visier : Hermann Pauls systematische Arbeit : 100 Jahre Deutsches Wörterbuch
(1997)
This article is a delineation of the "Projekt Klassikerwortschatz" that collects and processes those words in german literature between ca. 1750 and 1900 which are semantically different in today’s german due to language change. It is the aim of the project to publish a dictionary in print, on CD-ROM as well as on the internet that explains these words in order to help to understand the literary language of the german "classic period". The dictionary will therefore be a beginning of an attempt to fill the gap between Reichmann’s FWB, the DWB and the DWDS which curiously coincides with this important period of german literature. The article focuses on the survey phase, when voluntary readers marked those words that made it difficult for them to understand a passage, the digitalization and the processing within the computerized environment. The main focus is on the digital editorial system „Paula“ which has been developped specifically for the "Klassikerwörterbuch" and enables the lexicographer to focus exclusively on the content of the article rather than its format.
Das KLASSIKERWÖRTERBUCH ist ein in allen lexikographischen Arbeitsschritten digital erstelltes historisches Wörterbuch zur heute nicht mehr unmittelbar verständlichen Lexik in der „klassischen“ deutschen Dichtung des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts. Als semantisches „Differenzwörterbuch“ behandelt es die lexikalischen Einheiten, die gegenüber dem heutigen Bedeutungswissen eine Änderung in der Semantik und/oder der Verwendung erfahren haben. Grundsätze der Korpusbestimmung, der Lemmaauswahl usw. wurden bereits an anderer Stelle ausführlich erläutert (Knoop/Brückner 2003). Auch eine Beschreibung von Mikrostrukturen im KLASSIKERWÖRTERBUCH liegt vor (Brückner 2004). Der vorliegende Beitrag ergänzt die bisherigen Veröffentlichungen durch eine typologische Einordnung des KLASSIKERWÖRTERBUCHs und seiner Konzeption in die deutsche Wörterbuchlandschaft. Dabei ist es nicht das Ziel, eine allgemeingültige Einteilung vorzunehmen oder jeden erwähnten Wörterbuchtyp in seinen eigenen Besonderheiten vollständig und angemessen darzustellen, sondern darum, durch den Vergleich mit anderen existierenden oder denkbaren Wörterbüchern das Konzept des KLASSIKERWÖRTERBUCHs deutlicher hervortreten zu lassen.