Refine
Document Type
- Article (5) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5) (remove)
Keywords
- Intonation <Linguistik> (5) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (4)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Frontiers Media S.A. (1)
- Istituto Italiano di Studi Germanici (1)
- Kossuth/Nodus (1)
- Stauffenburg (1)
- de Gruyter (1)
In diesem Beitrag stellen wir die Ergebnisse einer Studie über die Intonation von Frageaktivitäten in deutschen Alltagsgesprächen vor. Unsere Untersuchung erforscht, inwieweit die Intonation zur Kontextualisierung von konversationellen Fragen beiträgt. In der Analyse stützen wir uns auf das autosegmental-metrische Modell von Peters und das taxonomische Modell der interaktionalen Prosodieforschung von Selting. Diese Modelle beschreiben jeweils phonologische oder pragmatische Aspekte der Frageintonation, zwei Dimensionen, die für sich genommen, keine vollständige Beschreibung liefern können. Auf der Grundlage authentischer Gesprächsdaten aus dem Korpus FOLK argumentieren wir für die Kompatibilität des autosegmental-metrischen Modells von Peters und des taxonomischen Modells der Frageintonation von Selting. Die Merkmale aus beiden Modellen lassen sich zu Bündeln kombinieren, die es erlauben, die Intonation von Fragen zu erfassen.
In conversation, turn-taking is usually fluid, with next speakers taking their turn right after the end of the previous turn. Most, but not all, previous studies show that next speakers start to plan their turn early, if possible already during the incoming turn. The present study makes use of the list-completion paradigm (Barthel et al., 2016), analyzing speech onset latencies and eye-movements of participants in a task-oriented dialogue with a confederate. The measures are used to disentangle the contributions to the timing of turn-taking of early planning of content on the one hand and initiation of articulation as a reaction to the upcoming turn-end on the other hand. Participants named objects visible on their computer screen in response to utterances that did, or did not, contain lexical and prosodic cues to the end of the incoming turn. In the presence of an early lexical cue, participants showed earlier gaze shifts toward the target objects and responded faster than in its absence, whereas the presence of a late intonational cue only led to faster response times and did not affect the timing of participants' eye movements. The results show that with a combination of eye-movement and turn-transition time measures it is possible to tease apart the effects of early planning and response initiation on turn timing. They are consistent with models of turn-taking that assume that next speakers (a) start planning their response as soon as the incoming turn's message can be understood and (b) monitor the incoming turn for cues to turn-completion so as to initiate their response when turn-transition becomes relevant.
The term “pivot” usually refers to two overlapping syntactic units such that the completion of the first unit simultaneously launches the second. In addition, pivots are generally said to be characterized by the smooth prosodic integration of their syntactic parts. This prosodic integration is typically achieved by prosodic-phonetic matching of the pivot components. As research on such turns in a range of languages has illustrated, speakers routinely deploy pivots so as to be able to continue past a point of possible turn completion, in the service of implementing some additional or revised action. This article seeks to build on, and complement, earlier research by exploring two issues in more detail as follows: (1) what exactly do pivotal turn extensions accomplish on the action dimension, and (2) what role does prosodic-phonetic packaging play in this? We will show that pivot constructions not only exhibit various degrees of prosodic-phonetic (non-)integration, i.e., differently strong cesuras, but that they can be ordered on a continuum, and that this cline maps onto the relationship of the actions accomplished by the components of the pivot construction. While tighter prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., weak(er) cesuring, co-occurs with post-pivot actions whose relationship to that of the pre-pivot tends to be rather retrospective in character, looser prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., strong(er) cesuring, is associated with a more prospective orientation of the post-pivot’s action. These observations also raise more general questions with regard to the analysis of action.
Recht haben im Sprachunterricht. Wie besteht man bei Meinungsgegensätzen auf seinem Standpunkt?
(2012)
„Den eigenen Standpunkt begründen und verteidigen" gehört zu den Kann-Beschreibungen im Europäischen Referenzrahmen für Sprachen. Um seinen Standpunkt verteidigen zu können, muss man unter anderem in der Lage sein, darauf hinzuweisen, dass man selber Recht hat, wie auch, einem Kommunikationspartner zu widersprechen. Der folgende Aufsatz untersucht intonatorische Sprachmittel, die ein Sprecher des Deutschen hierzu einsetzen kann: Betonung des finiten Verbs, einer Partikel wie wohl oder doch oder eines Negationsausdrucks wie nicht oder kein. In der Linguistik spricht man von Verumfokus und Negationsfokus. Der Aufsatz erklärt, was unter Fokus zu verstehen ist, und gibt Beispiele dafür, wie er in gesprochener und geschriebener Sprache funktioniert. Er zeigt auf, welchen Stellenwert Intonation im Sprachunterricht haben kann und sollte, und schließt mit einigen praktischen Übungsvorschlägen.
Operator-Skopus-Strukturen
(1999)