Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (46) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (31)
- Other (5)
- Book (4)
- Working Paper (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Review (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (46) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (20)
- Sprache (6)
- Deutschland (5)
- Linguistik (5)
- Rap (4)
- Diskursanalyse (3)
- Genus (3)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (3)
- Liedtext (3)
- Wortbildung (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (46) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (41)
- Peer-Review (3)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (46) (remove)
Präpositionalphrasen
(2018)
Wortarten
(2018)
Konnektoren
(2018)
Who understands Low German today and who can speak it? Who makes use of media and cultural events in Low German? What images do people in northern Germany associate with Low German and what is their view of their regional language?
These and further questions are answered in this brochure with the help of representative data collected in a telephone survey of a total of 1,632 people from eight federal states (Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania and Schleswig-Holstein as well as Brandenburg, North Rhine-Westphalia and Saxony-Anhalt).
The aim of this paper is to present the results of an empirical analysis of the use of non-alphabetic graphic signs (e.g. asterisks, slashes, plus signs etc.) in the context of repairs in Russian and German informal electronic communication. The data for the analysis were taken from the “Mobile Communication Database MoCoDa” (http://mocoda.spracheinteraktion.de/), which contains Russian and German private electronic communication via SMS, WhatsApp and other short message services, and the “Dortmunder Chat-Korpus” (http://www.chatkorpus.tu-dortmund.de/korpora.html). This paper describes the functions of various graphic resources in the context of repairs in both data collections and compares the occurrences of these functions in current Russian and German computer-mediated communication. It concludes that particular signs in both data sets share the same subset of functions, but they differ in terms of how frequently these resources occur in each form of communication.