Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (42) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (19)
- Article (8)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Working Paper (4)
- Other (2)
- Book (1)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (42) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (42) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (22)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (10)
- Peer-review (6)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (18)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (3)
- De Gruyter (2)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
- CLARIN Legal and Ethical Issues Committee (CLIC) (1)
- Charles University (1)
- EACL (1)
- Editions Tradulex (1)
- European Network of e-Lexicography (ENeL) (1)
- Karolinum Verlag (1)
The possibilities of re-use and archiving of spoken and written corpora are affected by personality rights (depending on legal tradition also called: the right of publicity), copyright law and data protection / privacy laws. These recommendations include information about legal aspects which should be considered while creating corpora to ensure the greatest archivability and re-usability possible in compliance with current laws.
The information compiled here shall serve researchers who plan to create corpora or who are involved in evaluation of such measures as a guideline. This information is not exhaustive or to be considered as legal advice. Researchers should consult institutional legal departments and management before making legally relevant decisions. That said, further legal expertise should be sought if possible as early as project planning phases.
In the NLP literature, adapting a parser to new text with properties different from the training data is commonly referred to as domain adaptation. In practice, however, the differences between texts from different sources often reflect a mixture of domain and genre properties, and it is by no means clear what impact each of those has on statistical parsing. In this paper, we investigate how differences between articles in a newspaper corpus relate to the concepts of genre and domain and how they influence parsing performance of a transition-based dependency parser. We do this by applying various similarity measures for data point selection and testing their adequacy for creating genre-aware parsing models.
In the NLP literature, adapting a parser to new text with properties different from the training data is commonly referred to as domain adaptation. In practice, however, the differences between texts from different sources often reflect a mixture of domain and genre properties, and it is by no means clear what impact each of those has on statistical parsing. In this paper, we investigate how differences between articles in a newspaper corpus relate to the concepts of genre and domain and how they influence parsing performance of a transition-based dependency parser. We do this by applying various similarity measures for data point selection and testing their adequacy for creating genre-aware parsing models.
Am 1. September 2016 hat das Forschungsprojekt „Lexik des gesprochenen Deutsch“ (= LeGeDe) am Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim als Kooperationsprojekt der Abteilungen Pragmatik und Lexik seine Arbeit aufgenommen. Dieses drittmittelgeförderte Projekt der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft (Leibniz-Wettbewerb 2016; Förderlinie 1: Innovative Vorhaben) hat eine Laufzeit von drei Jahren (1.9.2016-31.8.2019) und besteht aus einem Team von Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern aus den Bereichen Lexikologie, Lexikografie, Gesprächsforschung, Korpus- und Computerlinguistik sowie Empirische Methoden. Im folgenden Beitrag werden neben Informationen zu den Eckdaten des Projekts, zu den unterschiedlichen Ausgangspunkten, dem Gegenstandsbereich, den Zielen sowie der LeGeDe-Datengrundlage vor allem einige grundlegende Forschungsfragen und methodologische Ansätze aufgezeigt sowie erste Vorschläge zur Gewinnung, Analyse und Strukturierung der Daten präsentiert. Zur lexikografischen Umsetzung werden verschiedene Möglichkeiten skizziert und im Ausblick einige Herausforderungen zusammengefasst.
In my talk, I present an empirical approach to detecting and describing proverbs as frozen sentences with specific functions in current language use. We have developed this approach in the EU project ‘SprichWort’ (based on the German Reference Corpus). The first chapter illustrates selected aspects of our complex, iterative procedure to validate proverb candidates. Based on our corpus-driven lexpan methodology of slot analysis I then discuss semantic restrictions of proverb patterns. Furthermore, I show different degrees of proverb quality ranging from genuine proverbs to non-proverb realizations of the same abstract pattern. On the one hand, the corpus validation reveals that proverbs are definitely perceived and used as relatively fixed entities and often as sentences. On the other hand, proverbs are not only interpreted as an interesting unique phenomenon but also as part of the whole lexicon, embedded in networks of different lexical items.
Mit diesem Bild beschreibt Hermann Unterstöger in einem „Sprachlabor“- Artikel der Süddeutschen Zeitung vom 23.3.2013 die Erfolgsgeschichte, die das Substantiv (das) Narrativ in den letzten 30 Jahren vorgelegt hat. Während Unterstöger feinsinnig den intertextuellen Bezug zum „Narrenschiff“ des Sebastian Brant oder dem gleichnamigen Roman von Katherine Ann Porter bemüht, wird Matthias Heine, der Autor von „Seit wann hat geil nichts mehr mit Sex zu tun? 100 deutsche Wörter und ihre erstaunlichen Karrieren“ in einem Artikel in der WELT vom 13.11.2016, wie nach diesem Buchtitel zu erwarten, eher grob: Dort heißt es: „Hinz und Kunz schwafeln heutzutage vom ,Narrativ‘“.