Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (24) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (8)
- Article (7)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Book (1)
- Review (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Gesprochene Sprache (24) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (13)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (11)
- Postprint (2)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (17)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (7)
Publisher
- European Language Resources Association (5)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
- Narr Francke Attempto (2)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (1)
- Benjamins (1)
- Buro van die WAT (1)
- Buske (1)
- CLARIN (1)
- Digital Curation Centre (1)
- Institut für Romanistik der Universität Wien & Institut für Schallforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1)
Interaktionale Semantik
(2020)
The newest generation of speech technology caused a huge increase of audio-visual data nowadays being enhanced with orthographic transcripts such as in automatic subtitling in online platforms. Research data centers and archives contain a range of new and historical data, which are currently only partially transcribed and therefore only partially accessible for systematic querying. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is one option of making that data accessible. This paper tests the usability of a state-of-the-art ASR-System on a historical (from the 1960s), but regionally balanced corpus of spoken German, and a relatively new corpus (from 2012) recorded in a narrow area. We observed a regional bias of the ASR-System with higher recognition scores for the north of Germany vs. lower scores for the south. A detailed analysis of the narrow region data revealed – despite relatively high ASR-confidence – some specific word errors due to a lack of regional adaptation. These findings need to be considered in decisions on further data processing and the curation of corpora, e.g. correcting transcripts or transcribing from scratch. Such geography-dependent analyses can also have the potential for ASR-development to make targeted data selection for training/adaptation and to increase the sensitivity towards varieties of pluricentric languages.
Lean syntax: how argument structure is adapted to its interactive, material, and temporal ecology
(2020)
It has often been argued that argument structure in spoken discourse is less complex than in written discourse. This paper argues that lean argument structure, in particular, argument omission, gives evidence of how the production and understanding of linguistic structures is adapted to the interactive, material, and temporal ecology of talk-in-interaction. It is shown how lean argument structure builds on participants' ongoing bodily conduct, joint perceptual salience, joint attention, and their Orientation to expectable next actions within a joint project. The phenomena discusscd in this paper are verb-derived discourse markers and tags, analepsis in responsive actions, and ellipsis in first actions, such as requests and instructions. The study draws from transcripts and audio- and video-recordings of naturally occurring interaction in German from the Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoken German (FOLK).
In diesem Beitrag werden exemplarisch verschiedene potenzielle Gebrauchsmuster mit dem deutschen Lemma wissen gesammelt und ihre in der Fachliteratur vorgelegten interaktionslinguistisch-funktionalen Beschreibungen für einen Strukturierungsversuch genutzt. Im Zentrum steht ein multifunktionaler handlungsorientierter Ansatz zur Beschreibung von Interaktion im Gespräch. Der Beitrag greift dabei Überlegungen auf, die im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts Lexik des gesprochenen Deutsch (= LeGeDe) zur Erstellung einer korpusbasierten lexikogra- fischen Ressource lexikalischer Besonderheiten des gesprochenen Deutsch in der Interaktion thematisiert wurden.
Schlüsselwörter: Muster, Lexik des gesprochenen Deutsch, Interaktion, Internetlexikografie
The newest generation of speech technology caused a huge increase of audio-visual data nowadays being enhanced with orthographic transcripts such as in automatic subtitling in online platforms. Research data centers and archives contain a range of new and historical data, which are currently only partially transcribed and therefore only partially accessible for systematic querying. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is one option of making that data accessible. This paper tests the usability of a state-of-the-art ASR-System on a historical (from the 1960s), but regionally balanced corpus of spoken German, and a relatively new corpus (from 2012) recorded in a narrow area. We observed a regional bias of the ASR-System with higher recognition scores for the north of Germany vs. lower scores for the south. A detailed analysis of the narrow region data revealed – despite relatively high ASR-confidence – some specific word errors due to a lack of regional adaptation. These findings need to be considered in decisions on further data processing and the curation of corpora, e.g. correcting transcripts or transcribing from scratch. Such geography-dependent analyses can also have the potential for ASR-development to make targeted data selection for training/adaptation and to increase the sensitivity towards varieties of pluricentric languages.
Sogenannte „Pragmatikalisierte Mehrworteinheiten“ sind im Deutschen hochfrequent und unterliegen bisweilen tiefgreifenden phonetischen Reduktionsprozessen. Diese können Realisierungsvarianten hervorbringen, die in der Rückschau auf mehr als eine lexematische Ursprungsform zurückführbar sind. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht mit [ˈzɐmɐ] einen besonders prägnanten Fall dieser Art anhand eines Perzeptionsexperimentes.
We present web services which implement a workflow for transcripts of spoken language following the TEI guidelines, in particular ISO 24624:2016 “Language resource management – Transcription of spoken language”. The web services are available at our website and will be available via the CLARIN infrastructure, including the Virtual Language Observatory and WebLicht.
CLARIN contractual framework for sharing language data: the perspective of personal data protection
(2020)
The article analyses the responsibility for ensuring compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in research settings. As a general rule, organisations are considered the data controller (responsible party for the GDPR compliance). Research constitutes a unique setting influenced by academic freedom. This raises the question of whether academics could be considered the controller as well. However, there are some court cases and policy documents on this issue. It is not settled yet. The analysis serves a preliminary analytical background for redesigning CLARIN contractual framework for sharing data.