Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (544)
- Conference Proceeding (196)
- Part of a Book (91)
- Review (39)
- Report (8)
- Part of Periodical (6)
- Book (5)
- Working Paper (4)
- Periodical (1)
Language
- German (460)
- English (397)
- French (14)
- Portuguese (6)
- Ukrainian (4)
- Multiple languages (3)
- Polish (3)
- Russian (3)
- Latvian (2)
- Croatian (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (894) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (287)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (109)
- Computerlinguistik (74)
- Rezension (68)
- Konversationsanalyse (61)
- Interaktion (55)
- Wörterbuch (41)
- Kommunikation (37)
- Gesprochene Sprache (30)
- Kongressbericht (30)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (552)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (220)
- Postprint (86)
- Hybrides Open Access (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
- Ahead of Print (1)
- Preprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (894) (remove)
Publisher
- IDS-Verlag (57)
- de Gruyter (46)
- Erich Schmidt (40)
- Schmidt (33)
- Erich Schmidt Verlag (29)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (25)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (24)
- Bibliographisches Institut (23)
- Steiner (18)
- Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache (GfdS) (17)
Social media, as the fifth estate, increasingly influence public discourses and play a major role in shaping public opinion. Undoubtedly, they have the potential to promote participation and democracy. On the other side, they also constitute a risk for democratic societies, as the spread of hate speech and fake news has shown. As a response, forms of counterspeech organised by civil society have emerged in social media to counter the normalisation of hate speech and democracy-threatening discourses. In order to influence discourse in social media in terms of the fifth estate, counterspeech campaigns must be visible also quantitatively. In this ethnographic contrastive study, I analysed the activities of the German and Finnish Facebook groups of the network #iamhere international. The intensity and continuity of their activities is obviously influenced by their strategic organisation: conventionalised rules support them whereas lacking or inconsequent rules seemed to be counterproductive.
What is the subject of German linguistics? This seemingly simple question has no obvious answer. In the ZGL’s first issue, the editors required contributions to cover the whole of the German language and to be theoretically sound but application-orientated, whereas the current ZGL-homepage defines the German language of present and history in all its differentiations as its subject matter.
Looking through the fifty volumes of ZGL, three relationships can be identified as presumably enlightening the role of language, in particular the German language: language and mind; language and language use; language and culture. Though of a different systematic type, language and data should be added as an increasingly important pairing for conceptualizing language. On this basis, I also discuss the position of linguistic studies of the German language, mirrored in the ZGL-volumes, between social, cultural and natural sciences, as well as the corresponding epistemic approaches – like explaining vs. understanding.
Das Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus für GesprochenesDeutsch (FOLK) ist ein Korpus des gesprochenen Deutsch in natürlichen sozialen Interaktionen, das seit 2008 in der Abteilung Pragmatik am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim aufgebaut wird. FOLK besteht aus Audio- und Videoaufzeichnungen natürlicher Gespräche aus verschiedensten gesellschaftlichen Bereichen (private, institutionelle und öffentliche Interaktionsdomäne), die durch Transkription, weitere Annotationen und Metadaten-Dokumentation für korpusgestützte Analysen erschlossen und zur wissenschaftlichen Nutzung bereitgestellt werden. FOLK wird auf vielfältige Weise für Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Deutsch genutzt, insbesondere in der Gesprächsforschung, der Korpuslinguistik und anwendungsorientierten Zweigen der Linguistik.
Durch die gewachsene Bedeutung der Psychoonkologie ist das Themenfeld der Krankheitsverarbeitung (Coping) vermehrt in das Blickfeld der Forschung gerückt. Gleichzeitig entstehen im Web 2.0 neue digitale Formen der intermedialen narrativen Repräsentation von Krankheit, Leid und Krankheitsbewältigung (Cybercoping), wodurch sich für Betroffene neue Möglichkeiten eröffnen, eine Erkrankung durch medienvermittelte Kommunikation und Vergemeinschaftung zu bewältigen und sich eine soziale Identität als chronisch Kranke zu verleihen (vgl. Deppermann 2018). Der Beitrag präsentiert auf theoretischer Basis der Copingforschung sowie der Gesprächsforschung zu narrativer Identitätsbildung eruierte Copingstrategien in Krankheitsnarrativen von Krebspatientinnen und -patienten. Coping wird als kommunikativer Prozess verstanden, der sich in Sprachhandlungen widerspiegelt. Das Untersuchungsmaterial bilden autobiografische Erzählungen in Internetvideos, öffentlich geteilt von zwanzig Betroffenen auf der Social-Media-Plattform YouTube. Copingmechanismen werden in den untersuchten Narrativen in Form von emotionsgeladenen Sprachäußerungen und humoristisch bzw. ironisch gefärbten Sprachhandlungen zur Emotionsregulierung und Entlastung sowie in Gestalt von metaphorischen Deutungsmustern und Personifizierungen der (Tumor-)Erkrankung angezeigt. In den Sprachhandlungen der Erzählenden wird aktives problemorientiertes Coping durch sich selbst und die Community aktivierende Sprache, eine häufig agentivische Selbstdarstellung und -positionierung der Betroffenen und eine durch Positivierung und Neubewertung sinnstiftende Kohärenz sichtbar.
Funktionsverbgefüge stehen seit jeher in der Sprachkritik, die sich nun auch auf digitale Räume ausbreitet. Vertreten wird dort die These, Funktionsverbgefüge und ihre entsprechenden Basisverben seien äquivalent und könnten in allen Kontexten durch die verbalen Entsprechungen ersetzt werden. Dies kann durch die vorliegende korpusbasierte und textlinguistische Studie am Beispiel des Gefüges Frage stellen widerlegt werden. Anhand eines extensiven Datenmaterials aus den Wikipedia-Artikel-Korpora des IDS zeige ich die semantischen, grammatischen und textlinguistischen Unterschiede zwischen dem Basisverb und dem Funktionsverbgefüge im Gebrauch auf, die sich in der Anreicherung, Verdichtung, Perspektivierung, Gewichtung und Wiederaufnahme von Informationen im Text manifestieren.
Words and their usages are in many cases closely related to or embedded in social, cultural, technical and ideological contexts. This does not only apply to individual words and specific senses, but to many vocabulary zones as well. Moreover, the development of words is often related to aspects of socio-cultural evolution in a broad sense. In this paper I will have a look at traditional dictionaries and digital lexical systems focussing on the question how they deal with socio-cultural and discourse-related aspects of word usage. I will also propose a number of suggestions how future digital lexical systems might be enriched in this respect.
eThis paper first attempts a state-of-the art overview of what is known about women in the history of lexicography up to the early twentieth century. It then focusses more closely on the German and German-English lexicographical traditions to 1900, examining them from three different perspectives (following Russell’s 2018 study of women in English lexicography): women as users and dedicatees of dictionaries; women as contributors to and compilers of lexicographical works; and (in a very preliminary way) women and female sexuality as represented in German/English bilingual dictionaries of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Russell (2018) was able to identify some 24 dictionaries invoking women as patrons, dedicatees or potential users before 1700, and some 150 works in English lexicography by women between 1500 and 1900, besides the contribution of hundreds of women as supporters and helpers, not least as unpaid readers and sub-editors for the Oxford English Dictionary. Equivalent research in other languages is lacking, but this paper presents some of the known examples of women as lexicographers. The evidence tends to support Russell’s finding for English, that women were more likely to find a place in lexicography outside the mainstream: sometimes in a more private sphere (like Hester Piozzi); often in bilingual lexicography (such as Margrethe Thiele, working on a Danish-French dictionary), including missionary and or colonizing activity (such as Cinie Louw in Africa, Daisy Bates in Australia); and in dialect description (Coronedi Berti in Italy, Luisa Lacal and María Moliner in Spain). Within the German-speaking context, women who participated in lexicographical work themselves are hard to identify before the late nineteenth century, though those few women who did have access to education were often engaged in language learning, including translation activity, and they were likely users of bilingual and multilingual dictionaries. Christian Ludwig’s (1706) English-German dictionary – the first of its kind – was dedicated to the Electoral Princess Sophia of Hanover. Elizabeth Weir may have been the first named female compiler of a German dictionary, with her bilingual New German Dictionary (1888). Rather better known are the cases of Agathe Lasch and Luise Pusch, who, as pioneering women in the field of German linguistics, ultimately led major lexicographical projects documenting German regional varieties in the first half of the twentieth century (Middle Low German and Hamburgish in the case of Lasch; the Hessisch Nassau dialect dictionary in the case of Berthold). In the light of existing research on gender and sexuality in the history of English lexicography (e. g. Iamartino 2010; Turton 2019), I conclude with a preliminary exploration how woman and sexuality have been represented in dictionaries of German and English, taking the words Hure and woman in bilingual German-English dictionaries of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as my case studies.