Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (110) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (110) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (45)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (20)
- Grammatik (11)
- Sprachvariante (8)
- Argumentstruktur (7)
- Sprachpolitik (6)
- Sprachwandel (6)
- Konversationsanalyse (5)
- Sprachgebrauch (5)
- Syntax (5)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (76)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (23)
- Postprint (10)
- Erstveröffentlichung (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (89)
- Peer-Review (8)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (2)
- Peer-review (1)
Publisher
Gute Argumente. Wo beginnen?
(2019)
Gerade allgemeinere Verben zeigen eine Variationsbreite der Verwendung, die nicht leicht zu einem einheitlichen Bild zu fassen ist. Am Beispiel des Verbs beginnen wird gezeigt, wie hier die Interaktion zwischen der Struktur der Aktanten und den grammatischen Regelmäßigkeiten funktioniert. Dabei wird versucht, in der Kombination von Valenzinformationen, Argumentstrukturpositionierungen und Musterbildungen im Gebrauch ein zusammenhängendes Bild dieses Verbs in seinen verschiedenen Verwendungen zu entwerfen.
Dieser Beitrag berichtet nicht nur über „Neues vom heutigen Deutsch“, sondern auch „vom alten Deutsch“, das bislang nicht gehoben wurde. Tief in grammatische Strukturen eingelassen verstecken sich (historische) Geschlechterkonzepte, die weit über das hinausgehen, was die Linguistik zu eindimensional unter Sexus versteht. Vielmehr geht es um Gender, um Geschlechterordnungen, die Frauen und Männern ihre sozialen Plätze zuweisen. Zuwiderhandlungen werden durch grammatische Devianzen und ‚Fehlklassifikationen‘ geahndet. Dabei werden die beiden Nominalklassifikationen des Genus (die Tunte, das Weib) und der Deklinationsklasse (die Vögte vs. die Strolche) analysiert. Als Drittes werden syntaktisch verfestigte Sprachgebrauchsmuster in Gestalt von Binomialen beleuchtet. Als gehärtete Folgen koordinierter Personenbezeichnungen kodieren sie geschlechterhierarchische Rangfolgen (Mann und Frau, Mama und Papa) und erweisen sich dabei ebenfalls als Reflexe von Sozial- und Geschlechterordnungen: Männer treten dabei (immer noch) vor Frauen, Mütter aber zunehmend vor Väter und vor allem Mamas vor Papas.
This paper investigates two verbal constructions containing the German verb verdienen (‘to earn / deserve’), e.g. er verdient sich sein Brot ‘he earns his living’ (lit. he earns himself his bread) und er verdient gewürdigt zu werden ‘he deserves to be appreciated". It is shown that the notion of analogy allows for motivating some important features of particular constructions with verdienen. Two interpretations of analogy are employed: analogy in the sense of non-hierarchical family resemblance on the one hand, and analogy leading to changes by mapping a structure from one domain to another on the other hand. It is suggested that both verdienen in combination with sich and verdienen in combination with a verbal complement can be accounted for by focusing on their formal and semantic similarities connecting them to other constructions coming from the same construction family. Moreover, it is shown that versprechen and vermögen could be regarded as analogical models for verdienen.
Research on language politics, policy, and planning is of importance to contact linguistics, since political relations between groups of language users, the way in which the use of language(s) is organized, and how language issues are politicized fundamentally shape the political and social conditions under which language varieties are in contact. This chapter first provides a short sketch of how language policy, planning, and politics have so far been conceptualized. Major subfields will be discussed, and then relevant actors and factors in these processes will be introduced. At the end, these aspects will be discussed from a contact linguistic perspective and summarized in a graphic visualization.
Studies on the Linguistic Landscapes (LLs) investigate frequencies, functions, and power relations between languages and their speakers in public space. Research on the LL thereby aims to understand how the production and perception of signs reflect and simultaneously shape realities. In this sense, the LL is one of the most dynamic places where processes of minoritization take place: the (in)visibility of minority languages and the functional and symbolic relationships to majority languages are in direct relationship with negotiations of minorities’ place in society. This chapter looks at minority languages in the LL from two major perspectives. Firstly, it discusses language policies, focussing on which policy categories and which domains of language use are of particular relevance for understanding minority languages in the LL. Then, it turns to issues of conflict, contestation, and exclusion by providing examples from a range of geographically and typologically prototypical case studies, including Israel, Canada, Belgium, the Basque Country, and Friesland.
This chapter investigates differences in language regards in Latvia and Estonia. Based on the results of a survey that had about 1000 respondents in each country, it analyses general views on languages and language-learning motivation, as well as specific regards of Estonian, Latvian, Russian, English, German and other languages. The results show that languages and language learning are generally important for the respondents; language-learning motivation is overwhelmingly instrumental. Besides the obvious value of the titular languages of each country, English and Russian are to differing degrees considered of importance for professional and leisure purposes, ahead of German, Finnish (in Estonia) and French, whereas other languages are of little relevance. In more emotionally related categories, differences are more salient. L1-speakers of Russian differ in their views from L1-speakers of Estonian and Latvian, indicating that the linguistic acculturation of society in Estonia tends to be more monodirectional towards Estonian, whereas in Latvia there are more bidirectional tendencies as both Latvian and Russian L1-speakers regard each other’s languages as at least moderately relevant.
This chapter introduces readers to the context and concept of this volume. It starts by providing an historical overview of languages and multilingualism in Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia, highlighting the 100th anniversary of statehood which the three Baltic states are celebrating in 2018. Then, the chapter briefly presents important strands of research on multilingualism in the region throughout the past decades; in particular, questions about language policies and the status of the national languages (Estonian, Latvian and Lithuanian) and Russian. It also touches on debates about languages in education and the roles of other languages such as the regional languages of Latgalian and Võro and the changing roles of international languages such as English and German. The chapter concludes by providing short summaries of the contributions to this book.