Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (196) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (196) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (196)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (52)
- Deutsch (47)
- Wörterbuch (31)
- Nationalsozialismus (23)
- Neologismus (22)
- Lexikografie (21)
- COVID-19 (20)
- Kommunikation (19)
- Lexikographie (16)
- Sprachgebrauch (16)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (133)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (60)
- Postprint (24)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (108)
- Peer-Review (89)
Publisher
- IDS-Verlag (73)
- de Gruyter (52)
- V&R unipress (16)
- Wilhelm Fink (14)
- Peter Lang (6)
- Ids-Verlag (5)
- Cambridge University Press (3)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (3)
- Benjamins (2)
- Bloomsbury Academic (1)
Der Beitrag beleuchtet die seit den Anfängen der Fachgeschichte geführte Debatte um die Positionierung der Sprachwissenschaft zur bzw. in der Gesellschaft mit Blick auf die Frage, inwieweit das Fach eine Deutungshoheit in sprachreflexiven Fragen beanspruche, beanspruchen könne oder solle. Es werden vier Strategien diskutiert, mit denen versucht wurde und wird, einen solchen Anspruch in der Gesellschaft zu proklamieren bzw. zu zementieren. Vor dem disziplinären Hintergrund der soziolinguistisch-sprachanthropologischen Sprachideologieforschung, die auch linguistische Positionen unter Sprachideologien fasst, werden die sprachwissenschaftlichen Positionierungsversuche dabei als diskursiv gerahmte, aber kontextsensitive Manöver in einem ‚Kampf um sprachideologische Deutungshoheit‘ verstanden.
Der Beitrag untersucht korpuspragmatisch am Beispiel der Präpositionalphrasen mit gegen Varianten der Gegenwehr in der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus. Im Vordergrund stehen Flugblätter, Programmschriften und Zeitungsartikel, die unter den Bedingungen von Verfolgung, Exil oder Desertation kollaborativ verfasst wurden. Eine Spur zu diesen Dokumenten, die die Heterogenität und die Konfliktlinien des Widerstands auf Textebene widerspiegeln, legt die Korpusauswertung mithilfe der soziopragmatischen Annotationen aus dem Paderborner HetWik-Projekt. Methodisch werden gegen-Phrasen anhand ihrer Füllerprofile und Kollokatoren einzelnen Handlungsmustern zugeordnet. Im Ergebnis zeigt sich der Solidarisierungseffekt von situativ verfestigten Kollokationen sowie eine (selbst)kritische Reflexion von NS-Feindschaften.
An ongoing academic and research program, the “Vocabula Grammatica” lexicon, implemented by the Centre for the Greek Language (Thessaloniki, Greece), aims at lemmatizing all the philological, grammatical, rhetorical, and metrical terms in the written texts of scholars (philologists and scholiasts) who curated the ancient Greek literature from the beginning of the Hellenistic period (4th/3rd c. BC) until the end of the Byzantine era (15th c. AD). In particular, it aspires to fill serious gaps (a) in the study of ancient Greek scholarship and (b) in the lexicography of the ancient Greek language and literature. By providing specific examples, we will highlight the typical and methodological features of the forthcoming dictionary.
In the course of the last years, digital lexicography has opened up a variety of avenues fostering the conceptualisation, application and use of constructicons, a type of lexicographical reference work which has revealed itself highly promising in terms of connectivity and flexibility, at the same time, however, also challenging as to its technical implementation. The present paper takes up the ambitious aim to propose some reflections as well as a first draft for a possible model of a multilingual ‘periphrasticon’ as a subtype of a bigger constructicon focusing on a specific typology-related structural feature, i. e. periphrasticity. Taking periphrastic verbal constructions in French, Italian and Spanish as a starting point, it tries to sketch out a unified constructional network including not only equivalent (or corresponding) constructions within Romance, but also establishing (formal and functional) cross-linguistic connections to German and English. Comprising the major languages available to most language learners in (at least) German-speaking environments, the model is also supposed to pave the way for multilingual constructicography which, on the one hand, is able to account for intra- and cross-linguistic relations and, on the other hand, can also prove a valuable tool for language learning and use.
Zumutung, Herausforderung, Notwendigkeit? Zum Stand der Forschung zu geschlechtergerechter Sprache
(2022)
The focus of this paper will be on lexical information systems and the framework guidelines for the definition of the curricula within the educational system of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/ Bozen (Italy). In Italy, the competences to be achieved at different school levels are published in the form of general guidelines. On this basis each school has to specify the general competency goals and to spell them out in a concrete curriculum. In this paper I will examine to what extent lexical information systems are represented in the framework guidelines within the German and the Italian educational system of the Autonomous Province, these being separate systems. In a second step, I will check the representations of the resources against the “Villa Vigoni Theses on Lexicography“. Finally, I will discuss the results and give an outlook for further research.
Wortgeschichte digital (‘digital word history’) is a new historical dictionary of New High German, the most recent period of German reaching from approximately 1600 AD up to the present. By contrast to many historical dictionaries, Wortgeschichte digital has a narrated text – a “word history” – at the core of its entries. The motivation for choosing this format rather than traditional microstructures is
briefly outlined. Special emphasis it put on the way these word histories interact with other components of the dictionary, notably with the quotation section. As Wortgeschichte digital is an online only project, visualizations play an important role for the design of the dictionary. Two examples are presented: first, the “quotation navigator” which is relevant for the microstructure of the entries, and, second, a timeline (“Zeitstrahl”) which is part of the macrostructure as it gives access to the lemma inventory from a diachronic point of view.