Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (17)
- Article (6)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Book (1)
- Periodical (1)
- Review (1)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (20)
- Corpus linguistics (15)
- Corpus technology (12)
- Large corpora (7)
- Annotation (6)
- Corpus annotation (6)
- Datenbanksystem (6)
- Corpus management (5)
- Deutsch (5)
- National corpus (5)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (28) (remove)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (28) (remove)
Sachkunde erwünscht
(1990)
The aim of this paper is to present the results of an empirical analysis of the use of non-alphabetic graphic signs (e.g. asterisks, slashes, plus signs etc.) in the context of repairs in Russian and German informal electronic communication. The data for the analysis were taken from the “Mobile Communication Database MoCoDa” (http://mocoda.spracheinteraktion.de/), which contains Russian and German private electronic communication via SMS, WhatsApp and other short message services, and the “Dortmunder Chat-Korpus” (http://www.chatkorpus.tu-dortmund.de/korpora.html). This paper describes the functions of various graphic resources in the context of repairs in both data collections and compares the occurrences of these functions in current Russian and German computer-mediated communication. It concludes that particular signs in both data sets share the same subset of functions, but they differ in terms of how frequently these resources occur in each form of communication.
Das Journal für Medienlinguistik (jfml) ist eine medienlinguistische Open-Access-Zeitschrift. Im Sinne einer offenen, interaktiven und unabhängigen Wissenschaftskultur erfolgt die Qualitätssicherung des jfml durch ein Open Peer Review und die medienlinguistische Expertise des Editorial Boards. Das jfml veröffentlicht deutsch- und englischsprachige Artikel, Rezensionen und Tagungsberichte, die fortlaufend erscheinen.
All linguistics should be media linguistics, but it is not. This thesis is presented by using linguistic landscapes as an example. LL research does not belong to the traditional core of either mainstream linguis-tics or media linguistics. This is why not everything within power has been done yet to make full use of their thematic, conceptual and methodological possibilities. Visible signs in public space, however, are an everyday phenomenon. You have to pull out all the stops to research them extensively. The distinction between linguistics and media linguistics turns out to be counterproductive. But this does not only apply to the case of linguistic landscapes. It also stands for any comprehensive investigation of language and language use. (Ex-ceptions may be very narrow questions for specific purposes.) The above thoughts are supported by a database of the project „Metro-polenzeichen“ with more than 25.000 systematically collected, ge-ocoded and tagged photographs.
Das vorliegende Themenheft widmet sich einigen „sperrigen“ Phänomenen des Deutschen, die sowohl für eine gebrauchsorientierte Grammatikographie als auch für eine stärker theoriebasierte Linguistik Herausforderungen darstellen, weil sie nicht recht in die gängigen Erklärungsmuster und Kategorienraster passen wollen oder gegen vermeintlich allgemeine Prinzipien und Regeln zu verstoßen scheinen. Als „Ausnahmen“ von Grammatiken (und ihren Benutzern) schon immer diskriminiert, als „Randphänomene“ lange Zeit im toten Winkel einer syntaxzentrierten neueren Linguistik, wird ihnen seit kurzer Zeit - gerade auch von Seiten der sprachtheoretisch orientierten Linguistik - wieder mehr Aufmerksamkeit zuteil.
Our paper describes an experiment aimed to assessment of lexical coverage in web corpora in comparison with the traditional ones for two closely related Slavic languages from the lexicographers’ perspective. The preliminary results show that web corpora should not be considered ― inferior, but rather ― different.
Contents:
1. Andreas Dittrich: Intra-connecting a small exemplary literary corpus with semantic web technologies for exploratory literary studies, S. 1
2. John Kirk, Anna Čermáková: From ICE to ICC: The new International Comparable Corpus, S. 7
3. Dawn Knight, Tess Fitzpatrick, Steve Morris, Jeremy Evas, Paul Rayson, Irena Spasic, Mark Stonelake, Enlli Môn Thomas, Steven Neale, Jennifer Needs, Scott Piao, Mair Rees, Gareth Watkins, Laurence Anthony, Thomas Michael Cobb, Margaret Deuchar, Kevin Donnelly, Michael McCarthy, Kevin Scannell: Creating CorCenCC (Corpws Cenedlaethol Cymraeg Cyfoes – The National Corpus of Contemporary Welsh), S. 13
4. Marc Kupietz, Andreas Witt, Piotr Bański, Dan Tufiş, Dan Cristea, Tamás Váradi: EuReCo - Joining Forces for a European Reference Corpus as a sustainable base for cross-linguistic research, S. 15
5. Harald Lüngen, Marc Kupietz: CMC Corpora in DeReKo, S. 20
6. David McClure, Mark Algee-Hewitt, Douris Steele, Erik Fredner, Hannah Walser: Organizing corpora at the Stanford Literary Lab, S. 25
7. Radoslav Rábara, Pavel Rychlý ,Ondřej Herman: Accelerating corpus search using multiple cores, S. 30
8. John Vidler, Stephen Wattam: Keeping Properties with the Data: CL-MetaHeaders – An Open Specification, S. 35
9. Vladimir Benko: Are Web Corpora Inferior? The Case of Czech and Slovak, S. 43
10. Edyta Jurkiewicz-Rohrbacher, Zrinka Kolaković, Björn Hansen: Web Corpora – the best possible solution for tracking phenomena in underresourced languages: clitics in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian, S. 49
11. Vít Suchomel: Removing Spam from Web Corpora Through Supervised Learning Using FastText, S. 56