Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Other (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (9)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (9) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (5)
- Annotation (4)
- Computerunterstützte Kommunikation (3)
- Internet (3)
- Automatische Spracherkennung (2)
- Deutsch (2)
- Anonymisierung (1)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (1)
- Dortmunder Chat-Korpus (1)
- Elektronisches Forum (1)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (6)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (4)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2)
- Peer-review (2)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (1)
Publisher
The paper presents best practices and results from projects dedicated to the creation of corpora of computer-mediated communication and social media interactions (CMC) from four different countries. Even though there are still many open issues related to building and annotating corpora of this type, there already exists a range of tested solutions which may serve as a starting point for a comprehensive discussion on how future standards for CMC corpora could (and should) be shaped like.
The paper reports on the results of a scientific colloquium dedicated to the creation of standards and best practices which are needed to facilitate the integration of language resources for CMC stemming from different origins and the linguistic analysis of CMC phenomena in different languages and genres. The key issue to be solved is that of interoperability – with respect to the structural representation of CMC genres, linguistic annotations metadata, and anonymization/pseudonymization schemas. The objective of the paper is to convince more projects to partake in a discussion about standards for CMC corpora and for the creation of a CMC corpus infrastructure across languages and genres. In view of the broad range of corpus projects which are currently underway all over Europe, there is a great window of opportunity for the creation of standards in a bottom-up approach.
Das Kommunizieren in Sozialen Medien und der Umgang mit Hypertexten ist im Jahr 2020 kein Randphänomen mehr. Die sprachlichen Besonderheiten internetbasierter Kommunikation und Sozialer Medien sind mittlerweile auch gut erforscht und beschrieben, allerdings werden diese bislang in deutschen Grammatiken, mit Ausnahme von Hoffmann (2014), allenfalls am Rande behandelt. Selbst neuere Ansätze zur Textanalyse, z. B. Ágel (2017), konzentrieren sich auf gestaltstabile, linear organisierte Schrifttexte. Dasselbe gilt für Ansätze, die primär für die Bewertung von Schreibprodukten in Bildungskontexten entwickelt wurden.
Tagset und Richtlinie für das PoSTagging von Sprachdaten aus Genres internetbasierter Kommunikation
(2015)
We present an empirical study addressing the question whether, and to which extent, lexicographic writing aids improve text revision results. German university students were asked to optimise two German texts using (1) no aids at all, (2) highlighted problems, or (3) highlighted problems accompanied by lexicographic resources that could be used to solve the specific problems. We found that participants from the third group corrected the largest number of problems and introduced the fewest semantic distortions during revision. Also, they reached the highest overall score and were most efficient (as measured in points per time). The second group with highlighted problems lies between the two other groups in almost every measure we analysed. We discuss these findings in the scope of intelligent writing environments, the effectiveness of writing aids in practical usage situations and teaching dictionary skills.