Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Preprint (18) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (7)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (5)
- Computerlinguistik (2)
- Deutschland (2)
- Geschlechtergerechte Sprache (2)
- Gesprochene Sprache (2)
- Kindersprache (2)
- Kommunikation (2)
- Metadaten (2)
- Russisch (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (7)
- Erstveröffentlichung (2)
- Postprint (1)
- Preprint (1)
Reviewstate
Time-based data models and the Text Encoding Initiative’s guidelines for transcription of speech
(2005)
Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender-inclusive language in German press texts
(2024)
Research on gender and language is tightly knitted to social debates on gender equality and non-discriminatory language use. Psycholinguistic scholars have made significant contributions in this field. However, corpus-based studies that investigate these matters within the context of language use are still rare. In our study, we address the question of how much textual material would actually have to be changed if non-gender-inclusive texts were rewritten to be gender-inclusive. This quantitative measure is an important empirical insight, as a recurring argument against the use of gender-inclusive German is that it supposedly makes written texts too long and complicated. It is also argued that gender-inclusive language has negative effects on language learners. However, such effects are only likely if gender-inclusive texts are very different from those that are not gender-inclusive. In our corpus-linguistic study, we manually annotated German press texts to identify the parts that would have to be changed. Our results show that, on average, less than 1% of all tokens would be affected by gender-inclusive language. This small proportion calls into question whether gender-inclusive German presents a substantial barrier to understanding and learning the language, particularly when we take into account the potential complexities of interpreting masculine generics.
This paper focuses on language change based on shifting social norms, in particular with regard to the debate on language and gender. It is a recurring argument in this debate that language develops "naturally" and that "severe interventions" - such as gender-inclusive language is often claimed to be - in the allegedly "organic" language system are inappropriate and even "dangerous". Such interventions are, however, not unprecedented. Socially motivated processes of language change are neither unusual nor new. We focus in our contribution on one important political-social space in Germany, the German Bundestag. Taking other struggles about language and gender in the plenaries of the Bundestag as a starting point, our article illustrates that language and gender has been a recurring issue in the German Bundestag since the 1980s. We demonstrate how this is reflected in linguistic practices of the Bundestag, by the use of a) designations for gays and lesbians; b) pair forms such as Bürgerinnen und Bürger (female and male citizens); and c) female forms of addresses and personal nouns ('Präsidentin' in addition to 'Präsident'). Lastly, we will discuss implications of these earlier language battles for the currently very heated debate about gender-inclusive language, especially regarding new forms with gender symbols like the asterisk or the colon (Lehrer*innen, Lehrer:innen; male*female teachers) which are intended to encompass all gender identities.
Es werden deutschsprachige Elemente in zwei russischsprachigen Zeitungen analysiert, die in Deutschland erscheinen und sich an russischsprachige Zuwanderer richten. Es handelt sich um die Wochenzeitung „Russkaja Germanija“ (‚Russisches Deutschland’), die für die unterschiedlichen russischsprachigen Leser in Deutschland gedacht ist, sowie um die monatlich erscheinende, für russlanddeutsche Aussiedler verfasste Zeitung „Zemljaki“ (‚Landsleute’). Untersucht werden lexikalische Entlehnungen und Übernahmen, unterschiedliche Verfahren ihrer Integration in den russischsprachigen Kontext und die charakteristische deutsch-russische Gestaltung des Impressums der beiden Zeitungen.
In dem Beitrag werden jüngste Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Sprachpolitik, der Bildungspolitik und der Integrationspolitik in Deutschland dargestellt, die ein neues Verhältnis zur Mehrsprachigkeit erkennen lassen und die Schaffung zweisprachiger Bildungseinrichtungen ermöglichen. Die deutsche Version dieses Beitrags ist nicht veröffentlicht, wohl aber die russische Version "Политические рамочные условия для создания и развития двуязычных детских дошкольных учреждений в Берлине" und die englische Version "The political framework for creation and development of bilingual Kindergartens in Berlin".
Das Benennungsspiel in der frühen Erwachsenen-Kind-Interaktion : eine Longitudinalstudie auf Deutsch
(2013)
In a previous study published in Nature Human Behaviour, Varnum and Grossmann claim that reductions in gender inequality are linked to reductions in pathogen prevalence in the United States between 1951 and 2013. Since the statistical methods used by Varnum and Grossmann are known to induce (seemingly) significant correlations between unrelated time series, so-called spurious or non-sense correlations, we test here whether the statistical association between gender inequality and pathogens prevalence in its current form also is the result of mis-specified models that do not correctly account for the temporal structure of the data. Our analysis clearly suggests that this is the case. We then discuss and apply several standard approaches of modelling time-series processes in the data and show that there is, at least as of now, no support for a statistical association between gender inequality and pathogen prevalence.
It was recently suggested in a study published in Nature Human Behaviour that the historical loosening of American culture was associated with a trade-off between higher creativity and lower order. To this end, Jackson et al. generate a linguistic index of cultural tightness based on the Google Books Ngram corpus and use this index to show that American norms loosened between 1800 and 2000. While we remain agnostic toward a potential loosening of American culture and a statistical association with creativity/order, we show here that the methods used by Jackson et al. are neither suitable for testing the validity of the index nor for establishing possible relationships with creativity/order.
As a result of legal restrictions the Google Ngram Corpora datasets are a) not accompanied by any metadata regarding the texts the corpora consist of and the data are b) truncated to prevent an indirect conclusion from the n-gram to the author of the text. Some of the consequences of this strategy are discussed in this article.