Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (172)
- Article (22)
- Conference Proceeding (16)
- Book (13)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Other (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (102)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (40)
- Wörterbuch (31)
- Verb (27)
- Lexikographie (24)
- Argumentstruktur (21)
- Englisch (15)
- Lehnwort (15)
- Sprachkontakt (15)
- Lexikografie (14)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (118)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (47)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- IDS-Verlag (79)
- de Gruyter (35)
- Narr Francke Attempto (28)
- De Gruyter (14)
- Ids-Verlag (5)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (5)
- Niemeyer (4)
- Buske (3)
- Winter (3)
- Akademie Verlag (2)
Dynamische Prozesse im Lexikon bilden einen Schwerpunkt der lexikalischen Forschung und lexikographischen Praxis am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache. In diesem Rahmen erforschen wir unter anderem die Erweiterung des Wortschatzes durch neue Wörter. Lexikologisch stehen dabei zwei Aufgaben im Mittelpunkt der Arbeit, zum einen die Ermittlung und Dokumentation sprachkontaktbedingter lexikalischer Entlehnungsprozesse mit dem Deutschen als Ziel- oder als Quellsprache (Fremdwörter im Deutschen, deutsche Lehnwörter in anderen Sprachen), zum anderen die Beobachtung, Dokumentation und empirische Erforschung aktueller Wandelprozesse im deutschen Wortschatz (Neologismen).
Die Ergebnisse der Forschung werden lexikographisch in Online-Informationssysteme überführt: das Deutsche Fremdwörterbuch, das Lehnwortportal Deutsch und das Neologismenwörterbuch. Die lexikographische Arbeit gründet sich dabei auf korpus- und internetbasierten Entwicklungen in zwei Bereichen. Erstens werden softwarebasierte lexikographische Arbeitsprozesse etabliert, die eine empirisch anspruchsvolle Erschließung des Gegenstands ermöglichen. Das beinhaltet unter anderem die Entwicklung korpusbasierter Analysesoftware und lexikographischer Redaktionssysteme. Zweitens werden zur Dokumentation der Forschung lexikalische Informationssysteme konzipiert und implementiert, die sich zum Teil an den Bedürfnissen von Laien orientieren, aber auch als Plattformen für die lexikologische Forschung dienen.
Der Beitrag wird diese Grundprinzipien lexikographischer Arbeit an Beispielen aus der aktuellen lexikographischen Tätigkeit am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache illustrieren, insbesondere in Bezug auf die laufende empirische Ermittlung von Neologismen und ihre internetlexikographische Dokumentation. Der komplexe Prozess der Neologismenermittlung involviert dabei frequenzgesteuerte Prozesse der Vorselektion von Neologismenkandidaten, manuelle Sammlungen von Neologismen aus verschiedenen Quellen und die Analyse der Kandidaten mit korpusanalytischer Software wie COSMAS II und OWIDplusLIVE. Unterstützt wird der lexikographische Prozess durch die Entwicklung komplexer, integrativer lexikographischer Werkzeuge wie NeoRate.
Binäre Strukturen mit nominalem Kopf treten in verschiedenen Formen auf, unter anderem als Substantiv mit präpositionalem Attribut, mit Adjektivattribut, mit attributiver Genitiv-NP oder als Kompositum. Da die Relation zwischen Kopf und Nicht-Kopf in solchen Nominalstrukturen anders als im Verbbereich meist nicht durch syntaktische und semantische Valenzeigenschaften des Kopfs gesteuert ist, bringen solche Strukturen zunächst einmal interpretatorische Uneindeutigkeiten mit sich, die besonders deutlich werden, wenn die beiden verbundenen lexikalischen Elemente keinen konventionalisierten semantischen oder enzyklopädischen Zusammenhang erschließen lassen. Der Interpretationsspielraum der vier Strukturtypen ist dabei unterschiedlich groß.
Die Gedichte Georg Trakls gelten allgemein als semantisch schwer zugänglich und stellen Gedichtinterpretationen vor einige Herausforderungen. Im Zentrum dieses Aufsatzes steht ein einzelner satzwertiger Vers aus einem Gedicht Trakls. Ziel ist es zu zeigen, wie literaturwissenschaftliche Interpretationen dieses Verses linguistisch rekonstruiert werden können, und zwar auf der Basis von grundlegenden lexikalischen Eigenschaften, Prozessen der Bedeutungsverschiebung, pragmatisch basierten Anreicherungsprozessen, Welt- und literarischem Wissen und insbesondere detaillierten Annahmen zur Argumentstruktur. Die changierende Bedeutung des untersuchten Verses, so eine der Schlussfolgerungen dieses Aufsatzes, basiert dabei neben Uminterpretationen und Bedeutungsanreicherungen insbesondere auf der Amalgamierung verschiedener Argumentstrukturmuster.
Die sprachlichen Auffälligkeiten, die in Gedichten zu beobachten sind, haben immer wieder Anlass zu verschiedenen Versionen der Abweichungstheorie gegeben, derzufolge die in Gedichten verwendete Sprache von nicht-lyrischer Sprache abweicht. Expressionistische Lyrik ist insbesondere für ihre argumentstrukturellen Innovationen bekannt. Auf der Basis eines Korpus expressionistischer Gedichte wird eine Übersicht über diese Auffälligkeiten gegeben, die die Grundlage für weitere Studien darstellen soll, in denen zu zeigen sein wird, inwieweit unter bestimmten grammatiktheoretischen Annahmen die Abweichungstheorie zurückgewiesen werden kann.
When comparing different tools in the field of natural language processing (NLP), the quality of their results usually has first priority. This is also true for tokenization. In the context of large and diverse corpora for linguistic research purposes, however, other criteria also play a role – not least sufficient speed to process the data in an acceptable amount of time. In this paper we evaluate several state of the art tokenization tools for German – including our own – with regard to theses criteria. We conclude that while not all tools are applicable in this setting, no compromises regarding quality need to be made.
Words and their usages are in many cases closely related to or embedded in social, cultural, technical and ideological contexts. This does not only apply to individual words and specific senses, but to many vocabulary zones as well. Moreover, the development of words is often related to aspects of socio-cultural evolution in a broad sense. In this paper I will have a look at traditional dictionaries and digital lexical systems focussing on the question how they deal with socio-cultural and discourse-related aspects of word usage. I will also propose a number of suggestions how future digital lexical systems might be enriched in this respect.
The public as linguistic authority: Why users turn to internet forums to differentiate between words
(2022)
This paper addresses the question of why we face unsatisfactory German dictionary entries when looking up and comparing two similar lexical terms that are loan words, new words, (near) synonyms, or confusables. It explains how users are aware of existing reference works but still search or post on language forums, often after consulting a dictionary and experiencing a range of dictionary based problems. Firstly, these dictionary based difficulties will be scrutinised in more detail with respect to content, function, presentation, and the language of definitions. Entries documenting loan words and commonly confused pairs from different lexical reference resources serve as examples to show the short comings. Secondly, I will explain why learning about your target group involves studying discussion forums. Forums are a valuable source for detailed user studies, enabling the examination of different communicative needs, concrete linguistic questions, speakers’ intuitions, and people’s reactions to posts and comments. Thirdly, with the help of two examples I will describe how the study of chats and forums had a major impact on the development of a recently compiled German dictionary of confusables. Finally, that same problem solving approach is applied to the idea of a future dictionary of neologisms and their synonyms.
eThis paper first attempts a state-of-the art overview of what is known about women in the history of lexicography up to the early twentieth century. It then focusses more closely on the German and German-English lexicographical traditions to 1900, examining them from three different perspectives (following Russell’s 2018 study of women in English lexicography): women as users and dedicatees of dictionaries; women as contributors to and compilers of lexicographical works; and (in a very preliminary way) women and female sexuality as represented in German/English bilingual dictionaries of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Russell (2018) was able to identify some 24 dictionaries invoking women as patrons, dedicatees or potential users before 1700, and some 150 works in English lexicography by women between 1500 and 1900, besides the contribution of hundreds of women as supporters and helpers, not least as unpaid readers and sub-editors for the Oxford English Dictionary. Equivalent research in other languages is lacking, but this paper presents some of the known examples of women as lexicographers. The evidence tends to support Russell’s finding for English, that women were more likely to find a place in lexicography outside the mainstream: sometimes in a more private sphere (like Hester Piozzi); often in bilingual lexicography (such as Margrethe Thiele, working on a Danish-French dictionary), including missionary and or colonizing activity (such as Cinie Louw in Africa, Daisy Bates in Australia); and in dialect description (Coronedi Berti in Italy, Luisa Lacal and María Moliner in Spain). Within the German-speaking context, women who participated in lexicographical work themselves are hard to identify before the late nineteenth century, though those few women who did have access to education were often engaged in language learning, including translation activity, and they were likely users of bilingual and multilingual dictionaries. Christian Ludwig’s (1706) English-German dictionary – the first of its kind – was dedicated to the Electoral Princess Sophia of Hanover. Elizabeth Weir may have been the first named female compiler of a German dictionary, with her bilingual New German Dictionary (1888). Rather better known are the cases of Agathe Lasch and Luise Pusch, who, as pioneering women in the field of German linguistics, ultimately led major lexicographical projects documenting German regional varieties in the first half of the twentieth century (Middle Low German and Hamburgish in the case of Lasch; the Hessisch Nassau dialect dictionary in the case of Berthold). In the light of existing research on gender and sexuality in the history of English lexicography (e. g. Iamartino 2010; Turton 2019), I conclude with a preliminary exploration how woman and sexuality have been represented in dictionaries of German and English, taking the words Hure and woman in bilingual German-English dictionaries of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as my case studies.
This paper focuses on the treatment of culture bound lexical items in a novel type of online learner’s dictionary model, the Phrase Based Active Dictionary (PAD). A PAD has a strong phraseological orientation: each meaning of a word is exclusively defined in a typical phraseological context. After introducing the relevant theory of realia in translation studies, we develop a broader notion of culture specific lexical items which is more apt to serve the purposes of learner’s lexicography and thus to satisfy the needs of a larger and often undefined target group. We discuss the treatment of such words and expressions in common English learner’s dictionaries and then present various excerpts from PAD entries in English, German, and Italian which display different strategies for coping with cultural contents in the lexicon. Our aim is to demonstrate that the phraseological approach at the core of the PAD model turns out to be extremely important to convey cultural knowledge in a suitable way for users to fully grasp cultural implications in language.
In foreign language teaching the use of dictionaries, especially bilingual, has always been related to the hypotheses concerning the relationship between the native language (L1) and second language acquisition method. If the bilingual dictionary was an obvious tool in the grammar-translation method, it was banned from the classroom in the direct, audiolingual and audiovisual methods. Also in the communicative method, foreign language learners are discouraged from using a dictionary. Its use should not obstruct the goals of communicatively oriented foreign language learning – a view still held by many foreign language teachers. Nevertheless, the reality has been different: Foreign language learners have always used dictionaries, even if they no longer possess a print dictionary and mainly use online resources and applications. Dictionaries and online resources will continue to play an important role in the future. In the Council of Europe’s language policy, with its emphasis on multilingualism and lifelong learning, the adequate use of reference tools as a strategic skill is highlighted. In several European countries, educational guidelines refer to the use of dictionaries in the context of media literacy, both in mother tongue and foreign language teaching. Not only is their adequate use important, but so too is the comparison, assessment and evaluation of the information presented, in order to develop Language Awareness and Language Learning Awareness. This is good news. However, does this mean that dictionaries are actually used in class? What role do dictionaries play in foreign language teaching in schools and universities? Are foreign language learners in the digital era really competent users? And how competent are their teachers? Are they familiar with the current (online) dictionary landscape? Can they support their students? After a more in-depth study of the status quo of dictionary use by foreign language learners and teachers and the gap between their needs and the reality, this contribution discusses the challenges facing lexicographers and meta-lexicographers and what educational policy measures are necessary to make their efforts worthwhile in turning foreign language learners – and their teachers – into competent users in a multilingual and digital world.