Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (11)
- Article (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (14)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (5)
- Annotation (3)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (2)
- Deutsch (2)
- Digitalisierung (2)
- Diskursanalyse (2)
- E-Learning (2)
- Multimodalität (2)
- Texttechnologie (2)
- XML (2)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (14) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (9)
- Peer-Review (2)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (1)
Publisher
- Springer (5)
- Lang (2)
- Benjamins (1)
- Buske (1)
- Deutsche Hochschulverband (DHV) (1)
- Deutscher Universitätsverlag (1)
- Metzler (1)
- Narr (1)
- Springer-Verlag (1)
Researchers in many disciplines, sometimes working in close cooperation, have been concerned with modeling textual data in order to account for texts as the prime information unit of written communication. The list of disciplines includes computer science and linguistics as well as more specialized disciplines like computational linguistics and text technology. What many of these efforts have in common is the aim to model textual data by means of abstract data types or data structures that support at least the semi-automatic processing of texts in any area of written communication.
Discourse parsing of complex text types such as scientific research articles requires the analysis of an input document on linguistic and structural levels that go beyond traditionally employed lexical discourse markers. This chapter describes a text-technological approach to discourse parsing. Discourse parsing with the aim of providing a discourse structure is seen as the addition of a new annotation layer for input documents marked up on several linguistic annotation levels. The discourse parser generates discourse structures according to the Rhetorical Structure Theory. An overview of the knowledge sources and components for parsing scientific joumal articles is given. The parser’s core consists of cascaded applications of the GAP, a Generic Annotation Parser. Details of the chart parsing algorithm are provided, as well as a short evaluation in terms of comparisons with reference annotations from our corpus and with recently developed Systems with a similar task.
The paper investigates the evolution of document grammars from a linguistic point of view. Document grammars have been developed in the past decades in order to formalize knowledge on the structure of textual information. A well-known instance of a document grammar is the »Document Type Definition« (DTD) as part of the Extensible Markup Language (XML). DTDs allow to define so-called tree grammars that constrain the application of tag-sets in the process of annotation of a document. In an XML-based document workflow, DTDs play a crucial role for validation and transforming huge amounts of texts in standardized data formats. An interesting point in the development of XML DTDs is the fact that the restriction of the formal expressiveness paved the way to understand the formal properties of document grammars better and to develop more a powerful version like XML Schema recently. In this sense, the simplicity of the original approach, resulting from the necessary restriction of previous approaches, yielded new complexity on formally understood grounds.
Vor dem Hintergrund einer neuen linguistischen Betrachtungsweise, die wissenschaftliche Präsentationen als eine eigenständige, komplexe, multimodale Textsorte auffasst, wird in diesem Beitrag zunächst der Aspekt der Multimodalität von Präsentationen fokussiert. Die analytische Beschäftigung mit wissenschaftlichen Präsentationen wird dann um erste Ergebnisse unserer Rezeptionsexperimente ergänzt, in denen unter anderem Erhebungen zur Wissensvermittlung unterschiedlicher wissenschaftlicher Präsentationen durchgeführt wurden.
This study examines what kind of cues and constraints for discourse interpretation can be derived from the logical and generic document structure of complex texts by the example of scientific journal articles. We performed statistical analysis on a corpus of scientific articles annotated on different annotations layers within the framework of XML-based multi-layer annotation. We introduce different discourse segment types that constrain the textual domains in which to identify rhetorical relation spans, and we show how a canonical sequence of text type structure categories is derived from the corpus annotations. Finally, we demonstrate how and which text type structure categories assigned to complex discourse segments of the type “block” statistically constrain the occurrence of rhetorical relation types.
In dependenzsyntaktischen Systemen wie denen von Engel (1982), Hudson (1984), Schubert (1987), Mel'čuk (1988) oder Starosta (1988) können gemeinhin nur Wörter andere Wörter oder Phrasen regieren. Auch wenn diese Annahme durchaus praktikabel ist, führt sie doch zu einer ganzen Reihe von syntaxtheoretischen Unzulänglichkeiten, die ausgearbeitete Dependenzgrammatiken gegenüber konkurrierenden Grammatiktheorien als unzulänglich erscheinen lassen. Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrages ist es, die Notwendigkeit darzulegen, auch komplexeren Einheiten Rektionsfähigkeit zuzugestehen, und mit dem Konzept des 'komplexen Elements' ein geeignetes formales Instrument dafür zur Verfügung zu stellen.
Situiertheit
(1993)
Integrated Linguistic Annotation Models and Their Application in the Domain of Antecedent Detection
(2011)
Seamless integration of various, often heterogeneous linguistic resources in terms of their output formats and a combined analysis of the respective annotation layers are crucial tasks for linguistic research. After a decade of concentration on the development of formats to structure single annotations for specific linguistic issues, in the last years a variety of specifications to store multiple annotations over the same primary data has been developed. The paper focuses on the integration of the knowledge resource logical document structure information into a text document to enhance the task of automatic anaphora resolution both for the task of candidate detection and antecedent selection. The paper investigates data structures necessary for knowledge integration and retrieval.