Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Keywords
- Konversationsanalyse (5) (remove)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (1)
Publisher
This article presents a revised version of GAT, a transcription system first devel-oped by a group of German conversation analysts and interactional linguists in 1998. GAT tries to follow as many principles and conventions as possible of the Jefferson-style transcription used in Conversation Analysis, yet proposes some conventions which are more compatible with linguistic and phonetic analyses of spoken language, especially for the representation of prosody in talk-in-interaction. After ten years of use by researchers in conversation and discourse analysis, the original GAT has been revised, against the background of past experience and in light of new necessities for the transcription of corpora arising from technologi-cal advances and methodological developments over recent years. The present text makes GAT accessible for the English-speaking community. It presents the GAT 2 transcription system with all its conventions and gives detailed instructions on how to transcribe spoken interaction at three levels of delicacy: minimal, basic and fine. In addition, it briefly introduces some tools that may be helpful for the user: the German online tutorial GAT-TO and the transcription editing software FOLKER.
Der Beitrag stellt eine aktualisierte Version des Gesprächsanalytischen Transkriptionssystems(GAT) dar. Nachdem GAT seit seiner Erstvorstellung im Jahr 1998 in der Gesprächsforschung eine breite Verwendung gefunden hat, war es nun an der Zeit, es aufgrund der bisherigen Erfahrungen und im Hinblick auf neue Anforderungen an Transkriptionen vorsichtig zu überarbeiten. Dieser Text stellt
das aktualisierte GAT 2-Transkriptionssystem mit allen seinen alten und neuen Konventionen dar, versucht bekannte Zweifelsfälle zu klären und bekannte Schwächen der ersten Version zu beheben. GAT 2 gibt detaillierte Anweisungen zum Erstellen gesprächsanalytischer Transkriptionen auf drei Detailliertheitsstufen, dem Minimal-, Basis- und Feintranskript, sowie neue Vorschläge zur Darstellung komplexerer Phänomene in Sonderzeilen. Zudem wurden für GAT 2 einige zusätzliche Hilfsmittel entwickelt, die im Anhang kurz vorgestellt werden: das Online-Tutorial GAT-TO sowie der Transkriptionseditor FOLKER.
The term “pivot” usually refers to two overlapping syntactic units such that the completion of the first unit simultaneously launches the second. In addition, pivots are generally said to be characterized by the smooth prosodic integration of their syntactic parts. This prosodic integration is typically achieved by prosodic-phonetic matching of the pivot components. As research on such turns in a range of languages has illustrated, speakers routinely deploy pivots so as to be able to continue past a point of possible turn completion, in the service of implementing some additional or revised action. This article seeks to build on, and complement, earlier research by exploring two issues in more detail as follows: (1) what exactly do pivotal turn extensions accomplish on the action dimension, and (2) what role does prosodic-phonetic packaging play in this? We will show that pivot constructions not only exhibit various degrees of prosodic-phonetic (non-)integration, i.e., differently strong cesuras, but that they can be ordered on a continuum, and that this cline maps onto the relationship of the actions accomplished by the components of the pivot construction. While tighter prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., weak(er) cesuring, co-occurs with post-pivot actions whose relationship to that of the pre-pivot tends to be rather retrospective in character, looser prosodic-phonetic integration, i.e., strong(er) cesuring, is associated with a more prospective orientation of the post-pivot’s action. These observations also raise more general questions with regard to the analysis of action.