Cogito. Studies in Philosophy and its History
Trieste: Edizioni Università di Trieste
Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (1)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (1)
Keywords
- Ausgrenzung (1)
- Beschwerdebrief (1)
- Bittbrief (1)
- Historische Sprachwissenschaft (1)
- Inklusion <Soziologie> (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Nationalsozialismus (1)
- Petition (1)
- Politische Kommunikation (1)
- Sprachgebrauch (1)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
Publisher
6
National Socialism, one could argue, was all about belonging: belonging to the ‘Volk’ or the ‘Volksgemeinschaft’, belonging to the ‘Aryan’ or ‘Non-Aryan race’, belonging to the National Socialist ‘movement’, and so on. These categories of belonging worked both inclusionary and exclusionary and they were constituted, proclaimed and enacted to a great part through language. What is more, they had to be performed through communicative acts. For the normative side of National Socialist propaganda and legislation, this seems rather obvious and one-directional. On the side of the general population, however, this entailed a mixture of communicative need to position oneself vis-à-vis National Socialism (mostly in affirmative ways), but also the urge to do so willingly. When we look at the language use of ‘ordinary people’ in different communicative situations and texts during National Socialism, we have to focus on these dimensions of discursive collusion, co-constitution and appropriation. People during National Socialism, such is our hypothesis, navigated through discourses of belonging and by that made them real and effective. Besides diaries, war letters and autobiographical writings, one way to grasp this phenomenon is to analyse petitions, i.e., letters of complaint and request sent in large numbers by ‘ordinary people’ to public authorities of the party and the state. As I will show by some examples, letter-writers tried to inscribe themselves within (what they took for) National Socialist discourses of belonging in order to legitimate their claims. By doing so, they co-constituted and co-created the discursive realm of National Socialism.