430 Deutsch
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (118) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (56)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (43)
- Gesprochene Sprache (12)
- Englisch (7)
- Wörterbuch (7)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (6)
- Annotation (5)
- Digital Humanities (5)
- Diskursanalyse (5)
- German (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (40)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (27)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (26)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (24)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (5)
Publisher
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (10)
- Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. (4)
- Edusp/Monferrer Produções (3)
- Evangelische Akademie Loccum (3)
- Universität zu Köln (3)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (2)
- Association of Internet Researchers (2)
- Clarin (2)
- Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo (2)
- ELRA (2)
Die durch die Covid-19-Pandemie bedingte Umstellung der Präsenzlehre auf digitale Lehr- und Lernformate stellte Lehrende und Studierende gleichermaßen vor eine Herausforderung. Innerhalb kürzester Zeit musste die Nutzung von Plattformen und digitalen Tools erlernt und getestet werden. Der Beitrag stellt exemplarisch Dienste und Werkzeuge von CLARIAH-DE vor und erläutert, wie die digitale Forschungsinfrastruktur Lehrende und Studierende auch im Rahmen der digitalen Lehre unterstützen kann.
We investigate whether prototypicality or prominence of semantic roles can account for role-related effects in sentence interpretation. We present two acceptability-rating experiments testing three different constructions: active, personal passive and DO-clefts involving the same type of transitive verbs that differ with respect to the agentive role features they select. Our results reveal that there is no cross-constructional advantage for prototypical roles (e.g., agents), hence disconfirming a central tenet of role prototypicality. Rather, acceptability clines depend on the construction under investigation, thereby highlighting different role features. This finding is in line with one core assumption of the prominence account stating that role features are flexibly highlighted depending on the discourse function of the respective construction.
To reach even language users not acquainted to the use of grammars the Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim (Germany) looked for new ways to handle grammatical problems. Instead of confronting users with abstractions frequent difficulties of German grammar are introduced in form of exemplary questions like „Which form should be used or preferred: Anfang dieses Jahre or Anfang diesen Jahres? Looking through the long list of such questions even laymen may find solutions of grammatical problems they might not be able to formulate as such.
The newest generation of speech technology caused a huge increase of audio-visual data nowadays being enhanced with orthographic transcripts such as in automatic subtitling in online platforms. Research data centers and archives contain a range of new and historical data, which are currently only partially transcribed and therefore only partially accessible for systematic querying. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is one option of making that data accessible. This paper tests the usability of a state-of-the-art ASR-System on a historical (from the 1960s), but regionally balanced corpus of spoken German, and a relatively new corpus (from 2012) recorded in a narrow area. We observed a regional bias of the ASR-System with higher recognition scores for the north of Germany vs. lower scores for the south. A detailed analysis of the narrow region data revealed – despite relatively high ASR-confidence – some specific word errors due to a lack of regional adaptation. These findings need to be considered in decisions on further data processing and the curation of corpora, e.g. correcting transcripts or transcribing from scratch. Such geography-dependent analyses can also have the potential for ASR-development to make targeted data selection for training/adaptation and to increase the sensitivity towards varieties of pluricentric languages.
The paper discusses particular logical consistency conditions satisfied by German proposition-embedding predicates which determine the question type (external and internal whether-form as well as exhaustive and non-exhaustive wh-form), the correlate type (es- or da-correlate) as well as the impact of the correlate on the respective consistency condition. It will turn out that some consistency conditions also determine the embedding of verb second and subject-control.
German subjectively veridical sicher sein ‘be certain’ can embed ob-clauses in negative contexts, while subjectively veridical glauben ‘believe’ and nonveridical möglich sein ‘be possible’ cannot. The Logical Form of F isn’t certain if M is in Rome is regarded as the negated disjunction of two sentences ¬(cf σ ∨ cf ¬σ) or ¬cf σ ∧ ¬cf ¬σ. Be certain can have this LF because ¬cf σ and ¬cf ¬σ are compatible and nonveridical. Believe excludes this LF because ¬bf σ and ¬bf ¬σ are incompatible in a question-under-discussion context. It follows from this incompatibility and from the incompatibility of bf σ and bf ¬σ that bf ¬σ and ¬bf σ are equivalent. Therefore believe cannot be nonveridical. Be possible doesn’t allow the LF either. Similar to believe, ¬pf σ and ¬pf ¬σ are incompatible. But unlike believe, pf σ and pf ¬σ are compatible.
Die vorliegende empirische Untersuchung befasst sich mit einer Umfrage zur Wörterbuchbenutzung bei 41 Studentinnen und Studenten des Dipartimento di Filologia, Letteratura e Linguistica der Universität Pisa, dasselbe Department, an dem auch das deutsch-italienische sprachwissenschaftliche Online-Wörterbuch DIL erarbeitet worden ist (vgl. Flinz: 2011). Die schriftliche Umfrage wurde in Anlehnung an Hartmanns 5. Hypothese „An analysis of users´ needs should precede dictionary design“ (1989) durchgeführt. Die wichtigsten Ergebnisse waren von großer Bedeutung für die Gestaltung der makro- und mikrostrukturellen Eigenschaften des Fachwörterbuches. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung und die daraus folgenden Reflektionen werden in thematischen Kernblöcken vorgestellt.
DIL is a bilingual (German-Italian) online dictionary of linguistics. It is still under construction and contains 240 lemmas belonging to the subfield of “German as a Foreign Language”, but other subfields are in preparation. DIL is an open dictionary; participation of experts from various subfields is welcome. The dictionary is intended for a user group with different levels of knowledge, therefore it is a multifunctional dictionary. An analysis of existing dictionaries, either in their online or written form, was essential in order to make important decisions for the macro- or microstructure of DIL; the results are discussed. Criteria for the selection of entries and an example of an entry conclude the article.