400 Sprache, Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (1014)
- Article (641)
- Conference Proceeding (358)
- Book (155)
- Other (52)
- Review (52)
- Doctoral Thesis (17)
- Working Paper (17)
- Part of Periodical (12)
- Preprint (8)
Language
- German (1367)
- English (884)
- French (27)
- Russian (27)
- Multiple languages (16)
- Portuguese (5)
- Polish (4)
- Ukrainian (4)
- Latvian (3)
- Spanish (2)
Keywords
- Deutsch (754)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (391)
- Konversationsanalyse (173)
- Interaktion (160)
- Computerlinguistik (142)
- Grammatik (117)
- Gesprochene Sprache (108)
- Kommunikation (104)
- Wörterbuch (100)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (89)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (1139)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (700)
- Postprint (207)
- Ahead of Print (5)
- Erstveröffentlichung (3)
- Preprint (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1094)
- Peer-Review (779)
- Peer-review (22)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (19)
- Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master, Diplom, Magister) (Bachelor, Master, Diss.) (4)
- Verlagslektorat (2)
- (Verlag)-Lektorat (1)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (1)
- (Verlags-)lektorat (1)
- Peer review (1)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (429)
- Narr Francke Attempto (74)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (59)
- Narr (55)
- Lang (51)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (50)
- Winter (50)
- Akademie-Verlag (46)
- Benjamins (44)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (36)
The Stuttgart-Tübingen Tagset (STTS) is a widely used POS annotation scheme for German which provides 54 different tags for the analysis on the part of speech level. The tagset, however, does not distinguish between adverbs and different types of particles used for expressing modality, intensity, graduation, or to mark the focus of the sentence. In the paper, we present an extension to the STTS which provides tags for a more fine-grained analysis of modification, based on a syntactic perspective on parts of speech. We argue that the new classification not only enables us to do corpus-based linguistic studies on modification, but also improves statistical parsing. We give proof of concept by training a data-driven dependency parser on data from the TiGer treebank, providing the parser a) with the original STTS tags and b) with the new tags. Results show an improved labelled accuracy for the new, syntactically motivated classification.
Power, in this article, is to be understood as an instrument of force that is imposed purposely in order to influence, affect or persuade others. The question here is whether such power is due to aggressive expressions (lexical level) or to context-dependent aspects (discourse level) that become relevant when insulting persons via new media. I will distinguish between “cyberbullying” as an attempt to hurt a persons feelings directly via personal SMS or email and “virtual character assassination attempts” that include third parties as an audience. Potential readers not directly involved are considered a constitutive eliciting element of power. It is assumed that their existence is even more important and effective (in terms of strengthening the perpetrators power) than aggressive language.
Ethnografische Dialoganalyse
(2014)