433 Deutsche Wörterbücher
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (21)
- Review (9)
- Book (8)
- Part of a Book (6)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (51)
Keywords
- Deutsch (31)
- Wörterbuch (25)
- Rezension (14)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (8)
- Lexikographie (6)
- computerunterstützte Lexikographie (5)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (4)
- Lexikologie (4)
- Deutschland (3)
- Die Welt <Zeitung, Hamburg> (3)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (4)
- Narr (4)
- Trojina, Institute for Applied Slovene Studies/Eesti Keele Instituut (3)
- Akademie Verlag (1)
- De Gruyter (1)
- EURALEX (1)
- Grimm (1)
- Hueber (1)
- Iudicium (1)
- Mannheim (1)
In diesem Wörterbuch finden sich von App bis Zickenalarm mehr als 570 Stichwörter, die die aktuelle Wortschatzerweiterung im Deutschen als Ausdruck der Anpassung des Wortschatzes an neue Gegebenheiten und Sachverhalte spiegeln. Erfasst und in umfangreichen Wortartikeln beschrieben und dokumentiert sind die Neulexeme und Neubedeutungen, die im Zeitraum von 2001 bis 2010 aufgekommen sind und sich weitgehend im allgemeinsprachlichen Teil des Wortschatzes der deutschen Standardsprache etabliert haben.
Gegenstand der Arbeit sind Illustrationen in Onlinewörterbüchern. Untersucht wurde, wie sie Wörterbuchartikel sinnvoll ergänzen und wie ihre Rezeption für den Benutzer erleichtert werden kann. Dazu wurden spezielle Methoden zur Erforschung dieser Fragen entwickelt und zwei empirische Studien durchgeführt: Zum einen wurden Wörterbuchbenutzer zu ihren Bedürfnissen und Gewohnheiten befragt, um beispielsweise mehr über die Auswahl zu illustrierender Lemmata und die optimale Bildgestaltung herauszufinden. Zum anderen wurden durch eine Blickbewegungsstudie Erkenntnisse zum Rezeptionsverhalten der Benutzer bei Text-Bild-Verknüpfungen im Wörterbuch gewonnen. Abschließend wurde der Untersuchungsgegenstand neu geordnet und eine Best-Practice-Anleitung zur Illustrierung von Onlinewörterbüchern entwickelt.
The methods utilized in the area of research into dictionary use are established research methods in the social sciences. After explicating the different steps of a typical empirical investigation, this article provides examples of how these different methods are used in various user studies conducted in the field of using online dictionaries. Thereby, different kinds of data collection (surveys as online questionnaires, log files and eye tracking) as well as different research design structures (for instance, ex-post-facto design or experimental design) are discussed.
Once a new word or a new meaning is added to a monolingual dictionary, the lexicographer is to provide a definition of this item. This paper focuses on the methodological challenges in writing such definitions. After a short discussion of the central terminology (method and definition), the article describes factors which inform this process: linguistic theories, linguistic and lexicographical methods, and types of definitions. Using the example of elexiko, a dictionary project of the Institute for the German language (IDS) in Mannheim, Germany, the paper finally showcases the compilation of definitions in a monolingual online dictionary of contemporary German.
Grosser deutscher Wortschatz
(2014)
Kommunikationsverben, an online reference work on German communication verbs and part of the dictionary portal OWID, describes the meaning of communication verbs on two levels: a lexical level, represented in the dictionary entries and by sets of lexical features, and a conceptual level, represented by different types of situations referred to by specific types of verbs. These two levels have each been implemented in special types of access structures. A first explorative access to the conceptual level provides the user with a list of the main classes of communication verbs, the subclasses of each of these, and the lexical fields pertaining to each subclass. Lexical fields are presented together with a characterisation of the situation type to which the verbs of that field are used to refer. Information about the conceptual level is additionally accessible by an advanced search option allowing the user to combine components of the characterisation of situation types to “create” any kind of situation and search for the verbs that correspond to it. Information about the lexical level of the meaning of communication verbs is accessible via the dictionary entries and by another advanced search option allowing the user to search for verbs with particular lexical features or combinations of these.
Contexts of dictionary use
(2013)
To design effective electronic dictionaries, reliable empirical information on how dictionaries are actually being used is of great value for lexicographers. To my knowledge, no existing empirical research addresses the context of dictionary use, or the extra-lexicographic situations in which a dictionary consultation is embedded. This is mainly due to the fact that data about these contexts is difficult to obtain. To take a first step in closing this research gap, I incorporated an open-ended question (“In which contexts or situations would you use a dictionary?”) into the online survey (N = 684) and asked the participants to answer this question by providing as much information as possible. Instead of presenting well-known facts about standardized types of usage situation, this paper will focus on the more offbeat circumstances of dictionary use and aims of users, as they are reflected in the responses. Overall, the results indicate that there is a community whose work is closely linked with dictionaries and, accordingly, they deal very routinely with this type of text. Dictionaries are also seen as a linguistic treasure trove for games or crossword puzzles, and as a standard which can be referred to as an authority. While it is important to emphasize that the results are only preliminary, they do indicate the potential of empirical research in this area.