400 Sprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (7)
- Part of Periodical (7)
- Book (5)
- Article (3)
- Review (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- German (19)
- English (5)
- French (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (26) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (14)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (5)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (10)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (9)
- Peer-review (1)
Publisher
Die Emigration nach Palästina von deutschsprachigen Juden („Jeckes“) in den 1930er Jahren ist als „Fünfte Alija“ in die zionistische Geschichtsschreibung eingegangen. Seit einigen Jahren zeigt sich ein reges historisches Interesse für die Jeckes und deren Beitrag zum Aufbau Israels. Diese neue Jeckes-Historiografie findet zeitgleich mit einer Hinterfragung der „großen zionistischen Erzählung“ in Israel statt. Besonders soll auf den wirtschaftlichen Aspekt dieser Meistererzählung eingegangen werden. Der Artikel stützt sich auf Lebenserzählungen und lebensgeschichtliche Interviews mit deutschsprachigen Israelis. Auffällig ist in diesen Selbstzeugnissen die Anzahl von Erfolgsgeschichten, die eine (männlich konnotierte) Figur des pionierhaften Entrepreneurs narrativ konturieren. Retrospektive Narrative von individuellem Wirtschaftserfolg des Israel Style-Unternehmers mit Pioniergeist und Entrepreneurqualitäten dienen also zur kollektiven (Wieder-)Erlangung eines jeckischen Stolzes. Dies soll mit der historischen Realität der Wirtschaftslage im Mandatsgebiet Palästina bzw. in Israel verglichen und kulturwissenschaftlich und kulturgeschichtlich mit Repräsentationen des „Neuen Juden“ verglichen werden.
Der Beitrag betrachtet movierbare Personenbezeichnungen, die in einem Prädikativum mit Bezug auf ein weibliches Subjekt gebraucht werden (Typ sie ist Käufer/Käuferin). In solchen Fällen ist neben der Verwendung der movierten Personenbezeichnung auch die ihrer maskulinen Basis möglich, wobei zum tatsächlichen Gebrauch der beiden Varianten bisher widersprüchliche Angaben und kaum Daten vorlagen. Diese Untersuchung ergibt, dass die Movierung in der Prädikativkonstruktion seit dem Ahd. der Normalfall war und ist. Allerdings lassen sich einige Nischen ausmachen, in denen unmovierte Bezeichnungen etwas frequenter sind: Der mit Abstand höchste Wert findet sich bei weiblicher Selbstreferenz, während Maskulina bei weiblichen Subjekten der dritten Person Singular mit einer Ausnahme weitgehend unüblich sind. Diese Ausnahme ist der offizielle Sprachgebrauch der damaligen DDR. Öffentlichkeitsgerichtete Texte des 20./21. Jh., die nicht aus der DDR stammen, zeigen einen vermutlich gesellschaftlich bedingten Rückgang der sowieso schon seltenen unmovierten Formen ab Mitte der 1970er-Jahre.
Die in diesem Band versammelten Beiträge zur Jahrestagung 2022 des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache geben einen Überblick zu aktuellen Entwicklungen der Erschließung und Nutzung von Korpora in der germanistischen Linguistik und darüber hinaus. Dabei steht im Vordergrund, wie bekannte und neue Korpora für die Untersuchung verschiedenster linguistischer Fragestellungen, z.B. der Lexikografie, der Gesprächsforschung, des Spracherwerbs oder der historischen Sprachwissenschaft, genutzt werden können.
Im Einzelnen geht es um:
- Korpusangebote und Korpusdesign
- Software für die Arbeit mit Korpora
- Korpusaufbereitung
- den Zusammenhang von Korpusaufbereitung und Forschungsfragestellungen
- ethisch-rechtliche Aspekte der Arbeit mit Korpora
- Anwendungs- und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten von Korpora
Diese Fragen werden im Kontext wissenschaftstheoretischer Überlegungen zur Frage des Nutzens von Korpora für die linguistische Erkenntnisbildung behandelt. Es werden dabei sowohl klassische Schrift- und Tonkorpora, als auch Korpora mit Daten aus anderen Medialitäten (Video und Social Media) vorgestellt. Eine weitere Dimension sind Vergleichskorpora mehrerer Sprachen oder Medialitäten (mündlich vs. schriftlich) sowie diachrone (Vergleichs-)Korpora und der Blick auf nicht-deutschsprachige Korpusangebote.
Repeating the movements associated with activities such as drawing or sports typically leads to improvements in kinematic behavior: these movements become faster, smoother, and exhibit less variation. Likewise, practice has also been shown to lead to faster and smoother movement trajectories in speech articulation. However, little is known about its effect on articulatory variability. To address this, we investigate the extent to which repetition and predictability influence the articulation of the frequent German word “sie” [zi] (they). We find that articulatory variability is proportional to speaking rate and the duration of [zi], and that overall variability decreases as [zi] is repeated during the experiment. Lower variability is also observed as the conditional probability of [zi] increases, and the greatest reduction in variability occurs during the execution of the vocalic target of [i]. These results indicate that practice can produce observable differences in the articulation of even the most common gestures used in speech.
eThis paper first attempts a state-of-the art overview of what is known about women in the history of lexicography up to the early twentieth century. It then focusses more closely on the German and German-English lexicographical traditions to 1900, examining them from three different perspectives (following Russell’s 2018 study of women in English lexicography): women as users and dedicatees of dictionaries; women as contributors to and compilers of lexicographical works; and (in a very preliminary way) women and female sexuality as represented in German/English bilingual dictionaries of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Russell (2018) was able to identify some 24 dictionaries invoking women as patrons, dedicatees or potential users before 1700, and some 150 works in English lexicography by women between 1500 and 1900, besides the contribution of hundreds of women as supporters and helpers, not least as unpaid readers and sub-editors for the Oxford English Dictionary. Equivalent research in other languages is lacking, but this paper presents some of the known examples of women as lexicographers. The evidence tends to support Russell’s finding for English, that women were more likely to find a place in lexicography outside the mainstream: sometimes in a more private sphere (like Hester Piozzi); often in bilingual lexicography (such as Margrethe Thiele, working on a Danish-French dictionary), including missionary and or colonizing activity (such as Cinie Louw in Africa, Daisy Bates in Australia); and in dialect description (Coronedi Berti in Italy, Luisa Lacal and María Moliner in Spain). Within the German-speaking context, women who participated in lexicographical work themselves are hard to identify before the late nineteenth century, though those few women who did have access to education were often engaged in language learning, including translation activity, and they were likely users of bilingual and multilingual dictionaries. Christian Ludwig’s (1706) English-German dictionary – the first of its kind – was dedicated to the Electoral Princess Sophia of Hanover. Elizabeth Weir may have been the first named female compiler of a German dictionary, with her bilingual New German Dictionary (1888). Rather better known are the cases of Agathe Lasch and Luise Pusch, who, as pioneering women in the field of German linguistics, ultimately led major lexicographical projects documenting German regional varieties in the first half of the twentieth century (Middle Low German and Hamburgish in the case of Lasch; the Hessisch Nassau dialect dictionary in the case of Berthold). In the light of existing research on gender and sexuality in the history of English lexicography (e. g. Iamartino 2010; Turton 2019), I conclude with a preliminary exploration how woman and sexuality have been represented in dictionaries of German and English, taking the words Hure and woman in bilingual German-English dictionaries of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as my case studies.
The public as linguistic authority: Why users turn to internet forums to differentiate between words
(2022)
This paper addresses the question of why we face unsatisfactory German dictionary entries when looking up and comparing two similar lexical terms that are loan words, new words, (near) synonyms, or confusables. It explains how users are aware of existing reference works but still search or post on language forums, often after consulting a dictionary and experiencing a range of dictionary based problems. Firstly, these dictionary based difficulties will be scrutinised in more detail with respect to content, function, presentation, and the language of definitions. Entries documenting loan words and commonly confused pairs from different lexical reference resources serve as examples to show the short comings. Secondly, I will explain why learning about your target group involves studying discussion forums. Forums are a valuable source for detailed user studies, enabling the examination of different communicative needs, concrete linguistic questions, speakers’ intuitions, and people’s reactions to posts and comments. Thirdly, with the help of two examples I will describe how the study of chats and forums had a major impact on the development of a recently compiled German dictionary of confusables. Finally, that same problem solving approach is applied to the idea of a future dictionary of neologisms and their synonyms.
In the course of the last years, digital lexicography has opened up a variety of avenues fostering the conceptualisation, application and use of constructicons, a type of lexicographical reference work which has revealed itself highly promising in terms of connectivity and flexibility, at the same time, however, also challenging as to its technical implementation. The present paper takes up the ambitious aim to propose some reflections as well as a first draft for a possible model of a multilingual ‘periphrasticon’ as a subtype of a bigger constructicon focusing on a specific typology-related structural feature, i. e. periphrasticity. Taking periphrastic verbal constructions in French, Italian and Spanish as a starting point, it tries to sketch out a unified constructional network including not only equivalent (or corresponding) constructions within Romance, but also establishing (formal and functional) cross-linguistic connections to German and English. Comprising the major languages available to most language learners in (at least) German-speaking environments, the model is also supposed to pave the way for multilingual constructicography which, on the one hand, is able to account for intra- and cross-linguistic relations and, on the other hand, can also prove a valuable tool for language learning and use.