L1: Lexikographie und Sprachdokumentation
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (79)
- Article (63)
- Book (12)
- Conference Proceeding (6)
- Other (6)
- Part of Periodical (3)
- Review (2)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (70)
- Neologismus (64)
- Sprachgebrauch (58)
- Deutsch (48)
- Wortschatz (35)
- Wörterbuch (33)
- Lexikografie (24)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (20)
- Nationalsozialismus (20)
- Kommunikation (19)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (89)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (62)
- Postprint (16)
- Ahead of Print (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (99)
- Peer-Review (32)
Hier sehen Sie neue Wörter sowie bekannte Wörter mit neuen Bedeutungen, die seit Beginn der COVID-19-Pandemie aufgekommen sind, bei denen wir aber noch beobachten, ob sie eine gewisse Verbreitung in die Allgemeinsprache erfahren werden. Zu jedem dieser Wörter geben wir eine (vorläufige, grobe) Bedeutungserläuterung an und illustrieren die Verwendung mit 1-2 Belegen.
Historische Werkzeugnisse. Reflexive Medienpraktiken in Kriegsgefangenenakten des Zweiten Weltkriegs
(2023)
Im US-Kriegsgefangenenlager Fort Hunt wurden während des Zweiten Weltkriegs deutsche Soldaten verhört und abgehört, was in Protokollen dokumentiert wurde. Die praxeologische Herausforderung besteht darin, Praktiken anhand dieses Materials adäquat zu analysieren. Dass wir Spuren in Archivdaten verstehen, ist in ihrer Semiotizität begründet. Dass sie die sie hervorbringenden Situationen überdauern, verdanken wir ihrer Medialität. In einer semiopraxeologischen Analyse, die diese beiden Grundkonstanten zeichenvermittelter Kommunikation in Beziehung zueinander setzt, wird erörtert, wie Praktiken sich aus ihren Spuren erschließen. Es wird gezeigt, wie sich an Dokumenten indexikalische und reflexive Verweise auf die heterogenen, praktischen Verwendungszusammenhänge über die Zeit manifestieren. Entsprechend sind Archivdokumente als historische Werkzeugnisse aufzufassen, die einerseits Vergangenes belegen und die andererseits praktisch gehandhabt werden, was wiederum neue Praxisindizes erzeugt und als Spuren am Material hinterlässt. Die Analyse zeigt, inwiefern Wissen nicht trotz, sondern aufgrund seiner semiotischen und materialen Manifestationen in (Archiv-)Dokumenten vorläufig ist und sich als Gegenstand weiterer Praktiken immer wieder verändern kann.
Das Lehnwortportal Deutsch (LWPD) ist ein Online-Informationssystem zu Entlehnungen von Wörtern aus dem Deutschen in andere Sprachen. Es beruht auf einer wachsenden Zahl von lexikographischen Ressourcen zu verschiedenen Sprachen und bietet eine einfache ressourcenübergreifende Suchfunktion an. Das Poster präsentiert eine derzeit in Entwicklung befindliche onomasiologische Suchfunktion für das LWPD.
Since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, about 2000 new lexical units have entered the German lexicon. These concern a multitude of coinings and word formations (Kuschelkontakt, rumaerosolen, pandemüde) as well as lexical borrowings mainly from English (Lockdown, Hotspot, Superspreader). In a special way, these neologisms function as keywords and lexical indicators sketching the development of the multifaceted corona discourse in Germany. They can be detected systematically by corpus-linguistic investigations of reports and debates in contemporary public communication. Keyword analyses not only exhibit new vocabulary, they also reveal discursive foci, patterns of argumentation and topicalisations within the diverse narratives of the discourse. With the help of quickly established and dominant neologisms, this paper will outline typical contexts and thematic references, but it will also identify speakers' attitudes and evaluations.
The public as linguistic authority: Why users turn to internet forums to differentiate between words
(2022)
This paper addresses the question of why we face unsatisfactory German dictionary entries when looking up and comparing two similar lexical terms that are loan words, new words, (near) synonyms, or confusables. It explains how users are aware of existing reference works but still search or post on language forums, often after consulting a dictionary and experiencing a range of dictionary based problems. Firstly, these dictionary based difficulties will be scrutinised in more detail with respect to content, function, presentation, and the language of definitions. Entries documenting loan words and commonly confused pairs from different lexical reference resources serve as examples to show the short comings. Secondly, I will explain why learning about your target group involves studying discussion forums. Forums are a valuable source for detailed user studies, enabling the examination of different communicative needs, concrete linguistic questions, speakers’ intuitions, and people’s reactions to posts and comments. Thirdly, with the help of two examples I will describe how the study of chats and forums had a major impact on the development of a recently compiled German dictionary of confusables. Finally, that same problem solving approach is applied to the idea of a future dictionary of neologisms and their synonyms.
Tok Pisin is a pidgin/creole language spoken since the late 19th century in most of the area that nowadays constitutes Papua New Guinea where it emerged under German colonial rule. Unusual for a pidgin/creole, Tok Pisin is characterized by a extensive lexicographic history. The Tok Pisin Dictionary Collection at the Leibniz Institute for the German Language, described in this article, includes about fifty dictionaries. The collection forms the basis for the sketch of the history of Tok Pisin lexicography as part of colonial history presented here. The basic thesis is that in the history of Tok Pisin, lexicographic strat egies, dictionary structures, and publication patterns reflect the interest (and disinterest) of various groups of colonial actors. Among these colonial actors, European scientists, Catholic missionaries, and the Australian and US militaries played important roles.
Between January 2020 and July 2021, many new words and phrases contributed to the expansion of the German vocabulary to enable communication under the new conditions that evolved during the Covid-19 pandemic. Medical and epidemiological vocabulary was integrated into the general language to a large extent. Suddenly, some lexemes from general language were used with very high frequency, while other words were used less often than before. These processes of language change can be studied in various ways, for example, in corpus linguistics with respect to the frequency or emergence of certain words in certain types of texts (e.g. press releases vs. posts in social media), in critical discourse analysis with respect to certain participants of the discourse (e.g. vocabulary of Covid-19 pandemic deniers), or in conversation analysis (e.g. with respect to new verbal interactions in greetings and farewells). The rapid expansion of vocabulary has notably affected also lexicography as a discipline of applied linguistics.
This article will focus on the ways in which a German neologism dictionary project has chosen to capture and document lexicographic information in a timely manner. Both challenges and advantages arise from lexicographic practice “at the pulse of time”. The Neologismenwörterbuch is presented as an example that lends itself well to such a discussion because its subject (neologisms) is characterized as new, innovative, and constantly changing.
This volume of Lexicographica : Series Maior focuses on lexicographic neology and neological lexicography concerning COVID-19 neologisms, featuring papers originally presented at the third Globalex Workshop on Lexicography and Neology (GWLN 2021).
The thirteen papers in this volume focus on ten languages: one Altaic (Korean), one Finno-Ugric (Hungarian), two Germanic (English and German), four Romance (French, Italian, [Brazilian and European] Portuguese and [Pan-American and European] Spanish), and one Slavic (Croatian), as well as the Sign Language of New Zealand. Specialized dictionaries of neologisms are discussed as well as general language ones, monolingual, bilingual and multilingual lexical resources, print and electronic dictionaries. Questions regarding terminology as well as general language and standard and norm regarding COVID-19 neologisms are raised and different methods of detecting candidates in media corpora, as well as by user contributions, are discussed.