Textlinguistik / Schriftsprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (60)
- Article (33)
- Conference Proceeding (7)
- Book (3)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
- Report (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- German (97)
- English (6)
- Italian (2)
- Portuguese (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (107)
Keywords
- Deutsch (43)
- Textlinguistik (13)
- Textverstehen (12)
- Stilistik (11)
- Diskursanalyse (9)
- Textsorte (9)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (7)
- Textanalyse (7)
- Qualität (5)
- Sprache (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (107) (remove)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (80)
- Peer-Review (23)
- Peer-review (2)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (42)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (9)
- Erich Schmidt (8)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (6)
- Niemeyer (3)
- Zenodo (3)
- Dagstuhl (2)
- De Gruyter (2)
- Hempen (2)
- Narr (2)
We present a simple tool for extracting text and markup information from printouts of (not only) scientific documents. While the heavy-lifting OCR is done by off-the-shelf tesseract, our focus is on detection, extraction, and basic categorization of color-highlighted text sections, as well as on providing a framework for downstream processing of extraction results. The tool can be useful for document analysis tasks that must, or benefit from being able to, use printed paper.
National Socialism, one could argue, was all about belonging: belonging to the ‘Volk’ or the ‘Volksgemeinschaft’, belonging to the ‘Aryan’ or ‘Non-Aryan race’, belonging to the National Socialist ‘movement’, and so on. These categories of belonging worked both inclusionary and exclusionary and they were constituted, proclaimed and enacted to a great part through language. What is more, they had to be performed through communicative acts. For the normative side of National Socialist propaganda and legislation, this seems rather obvious and one-directional. On the side of the general population, however, this entailed a mixture of communicative need to position oneself vis-à-vis National Socialism (mostly in affirmative ways), but also the urge to do so willingly. When we look at the language use of ‘ordinary people’ in different communicative situations and texts during National Socialism, we have to focus on these dimensions of discursive collusion, co-constitution and appropriation. People during National Socialism, such is our hypothesis, navigated through discourses of belonging and by that made them real and effective. Besides diaries, war letters and autobiographical writings, one way to grasp this phenomenon is to analyse petitions, i.e., letters of complaint and request sent in large numbers by ‘ordinary people’ to public authorities of the party and the state. As I will show by some examples, letter-writers tried to inscribe themselves within (what they took for) National Socialist discourses of belonging in order to legitimate their claims. By doing so, they co-constituted and co-created the discursive realm of National Socialism.
The workshop presents ATHEN 1 (Annotation and Text Highlighting Environment), an extensible desktop-based annotation environment which supports more than just regular annotation. Besides being a general purpose annotation environment, ATHEN supports indexing and querying support of your data as well as the ability to automatically preprocess your data with Meta information. It is especially suited for those who want to extend existing general purpose annotation tools by implementing their own custom features, which cannot be fulfilled by other available annotation environments. On the according gitlab, we provide online tutorials, which demonstrate the use of specific features of ATHEN
Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die methodischen Ausgangspunkte des Projekts MIT. Qualität und stellt einige zentrale Erkenntnisse zur Modellbildung, der korpuslinguistischen Analyse und Akzeptabilitätserhebungen in der Sprachgemeinschaft vor. Wir zeigen dabei, wie bestehende Textqualitätsmodelle anhand einer Analyse einschlägiger Ratgeberliteratur erweitert werden können. Es wurden zwei empirische Fallstudien durchgeführt, die beide auf die Herstellung von textueller Kohärenz mittels des Kausalkonnektors weil fokussieren. Wir stellen zunächst eine korpuskontrastive Analyse vor. Weiterhin zeigen wir, wie man anhand verschiedener Aufgabenstellungen diverse Aspekte von Akzeptabilität in der Sprachgemeinschaft abprüfen kann.
The question of whether a letter is a grapheme or not is a perennial issue in writing research. The answer depends on which criteria are used to differentiate between letters and graphemes and, ultimately,how the unit ‘grapheme’ is defined. This problem is particularly relevant to complex graphemes, i.e. sequences of letters that behave like a single grapheme in certain respects. Typical for German is the ‹ch›. This paper argues for a scalar concept of graphemes, which compares the grapheme status of each of the units under investigation. For this purpose, new criteria for the identification of complex graphemes are used, which originate from handwriting analysis. There, it is shown that complex graphemes are connected with each other disproportionately often and also have deviating letter forms disproportionately often.
Die vorgestellte Studie untersucht die Anteile unterschiedlicher Redewiedergabeformen im Vergleich zwischen zwei Literaturtypen von gegensätzlichen Enden des Spektrums: Hochliteratur – definiert als Werke, die auf der Auswahlliste von Literaturpreisen standen – und Heftromanen, massenproduzierten Erzählwerken, die zumeist über den Zeitschriftenhandel vertrieben werden und früher abwertend als „Romane der Unterschicht” (Nusser 1981) bezeichnet wurden. Unsere These ist, dass sich diese Literaturtypen hinsichtlich ihrer Erzählweise unterscheiden, und sich dies in den verwendeten Wiedergabeformen niederschlägt. Der Fokus der Untersuchung liegt auf der Dichotomie zwischen direkter und nicht-direkter Wiedergabe, die schon in der klassischen Rhetorik aufgemacht wurde.