Spracherwerb
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (29)
- Article (6)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Preprint (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (43)
Keywords
- Deutsch (26)
- Spracherwerb (17)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (10)
- Fremdsprache (6)
- Französisch (4)
- Kind (4)
- Sprachkompetenz (4)
- Europa (3)
- Fremdsprachenunterricht (3)
- German (3)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (23)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (6)
- Postprint (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (21)
- Peer-Review (4)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (1)
Publisher
This study examines the pitch profiles of French learners of German and German learners of French, both in their native language (L1), and in their respective foreign language (L2). Results of the analysis of 84 speakers suggest that for short read sentences, French and German speakers do not show pitch range differences in their native production. Furthermore, analyses of mean f0 and pitch range indicate that range is not necessarily reduced in L2 productions. These results are different from results reported in prior research. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.
Das Benennungsspiel in der frühen Erwachsenen-Kind-Interaktion : eine Longitudinalstudie auf Deutsch
(2013)
Die geltende amtliche Regelung der deutschen Rechtschreibung geht auf einen Kompromiss aus dem Jahre 2006 zurück, der im Bereich der Kommasetzung bei Infinitivgruppen einen neuerlichen Paradigmenwechsel bedeutete: Während für die Vorreformregelung das Konzept des sog. erweiterten Infinitivs konstituierend war und die Reformregelung sich wesentlich auf schreibstilistische Kriterien gründete, bilden die Basis der aktuellen Regelung grammatisch beschreibbare Fallgruppen. Dieser Umstand schon allein, mehr aber der zentrale Auftrag einer Beobachtung des Schreibgebrauchs durch den Rat für deutsche Retschreibung waren der Rahmen für die vorliegende Pilotstudie, in der das freie Schreiben Grundlage einer differenzierten Analyse des Kommagebrauchs bei Infinitivgruppen ist.
Der vorliegende Beitrag skizziert in einem ersten Abschnitt Gegenstandsbereich und kodifizierte Regelung, bevor er im Weiteren das Studiendesign und die Ergebnisse vorstellt. Die Ergebnisse werden nach Fallgruppen sowie im Hinblick auf übergreifende Tendenzen und Beobachtungen besprochen. Sie sind Ausgangspunkt der im Ausblick formulierten Thesen.
The paper (1) starts from the general understanding of children’s development gained by interdisciplinary endeavours during the last decades, (2) characterises the functional-pragmatic conception of language and language acquisition as opposed to conceptions of language as an isolated system and of language acquisition as an independent module of development, (3) describes forms of language acquisition and language mediation.
Designing a Bilingual Speech Corpus for French and German Language Learners: a Two-Step Process
(2014)
We present the design of a corpus of native and non-native speech for the language pair French-German, with a special emphasis on phonetic and prosodic aspects. To our knowledge there is no suitable corpus, in terms of size and coverage, currently available for the target language pair. To select the target L1-L2 interference phenomena we prepare a small preliminary corpus (corpus1), which is analyzed for coverage and cross-checked jointly by French and German experts. Based on this analysis, target phenomena on the phonetic and phonological level are selected on the basis of the expected degree of deviation from the native performance and the frequency of occurrence. 14 speakers performed both L2 (either French or German) and L1 material (either German or French). This allowed us to test, recordings duration, recordings material, the performance of our automatic aligner software. Then, we built corpus2 taking into account what we learned about corpus1. The aims are the same but we adapted speech material to avoid too long recording sessions. 100 speakers will be recorded. The corpus (corpus1 and corpus2) will be prepared as a searchable database, available for the scientific community after completion of the project.
Die diesjährige Jahrestagung des Leibniz-Instituts für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim mit dem Titel „Deutsch in Europa“ zielte auf eine Perspektivenerweiterung ab. In zwölf Fachvorträgen, neun Projektvorstellungen im Rahmen einer Methodenmesse und einer Podiumsdiskussion wurden sprachpolitische, grammatische und methodische Aspekte des sprachlichen Nebeneinanders in Europa, des Sprachvergleichs und des Deutscherwerbs diskutiert.
In literate societies linguistic competence includes speaking as well as writing. Talking and writing are rather different activities, therefore one should expect that in foreign language teaching (and especially in german-as-foreign-language teaching) both parts are included in equal proportions. However, the practise of teaching shows that written language is dominant and spoken language lives a shadow existence (section 1). In the following I will give five reasons as to why spoken language stands in the background and why it is such a bulky and clumsy subject (section 2). After which I will characterise two points of view one can take in regards to the magnitude of the differences between spoken and written language (section 3) and I will describe some of the central differences (section 4). Finally, 1 will formulate some consequences of this study for foreign language teaching, and I will argue that the difficulties connected with spoken language should be confronted, as in my opinion spoken language is an indispensable part of foreign language teaching (section 5).