Quantitative Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (21)
- Part of a Book (19)
- Other (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Sprachstatistik (16)
- Deutsch (14)
- Wortschatz (12)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (11)
- Lexikostatistik (10)
- COVID-19 (8)
- Online-Medien (8)
- Vielfalt (8)
- Sprachwandel (6)
- Statistik (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (26)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (18)
- Postprint (9)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (7)
- Wilhelm Fink (6)
- de Gruyter (4)
- De Gruyter (3)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2)
- MDPI (2)
- Springer Nature (2)
- Benjamins (1)
- Buske (1)
- Erich Schmidt (1)
Daten und Metadaten
(2022)
In diesem Kapitel werden Metadaten als Daten definiert, die der Dokumentation und/oder Beschreibung empirischer Sprachdaten dienen. Einleitend werden die verschiedenen Funktionen von Metadaten im Forschungsprozess und ihre Bedeutung für die Konzepte der Ausgewogenheit und Repräsentativität diskutiert. Anhand des Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Gesprochenes Deutsch (FOLK) werden dann Metadaten eines konkreten Korpus vorgestellt, und es wird gezeigt, wie diese bei Korpusanalysen zum Einsatz kommen.
We present a technique called event mapping that allows to project text representations into event lists, produce an event table, and derive quantitative conclusions to compare the text representations. The main application of the technique is the case where two classes of text representations have been collected in two different settings (e.g., as annotations in two different formal frameworks) and we can compare the two classes with respect to their systematic differences in the event table. We illustrate how the technique works by applying it to data collected in two experiments (one using annotations in Vladimir Propp’s framework, the other using natural language summaries).
How (and when) do speakers generalise from memorised exemplars of a construction to a productive schema? The present paper presents a novel take on this issue by offering a corpus-based approach to semantic extension processes. Focusing on clusters of German ADJ N expressions involving the heavily polysemous adjective tief ‚deep’, it is shown that type frequency (a commonly used measure of productivity) needs to be relativised to distinct semantic classes within the overall usage spectrum of a given construction in order to predict the occurrence of novel types within a particular region of this spectrum. Some methodological and theoretical implications for usage-based linguistic model building are considered.
Large-scale empirical evidence indicates a fascinating statistical relationship between the estimated number of language users and its linguistic and statistical structure. In this context, the linguistic niche hypothesis argues that this relationship reflects a negative selection against morphological paradigms that are hard to learn for adults, because languages with a large number of speakers are assumed to be typically spoken and learned by greater proportions of adults. In this paper, this conjecture is tested empirically for more than 2000 languages. The results question the idea of the impact of non-native speakers on the grammatical and statistical structure of languages, as it is demonstrated that the relative proportion of non-native speakers does not significantly correlate with either morphological or information-theoretic complexity. While it thus seems that large numbers of adult learners/speakers do not affect the (grammatical or statistical) structure of a language, the results suggest that there is indeed a relationship between the number of speakers and (especially) information-theoretic complexity, i.e. entropy rates. A potential explanation for the observed relationship is discussed.
Computational language models (LMs), most notably exemplified by the widespread success of OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot, show impressive performance on a wide range of linguistic tasks, thus providing cognitive science and linguistics with a computational working model to empirically study different aspects of human language. Here, we use LMs to test the hypothesis that languages with more speakers tend to be easier to learn. In two experiments, we train several LMs—ranging from very simple n-gram models to state-of-the-art deep neural networks—on written cross-linguistic corpus data covering 1293 different languages and statistically estimate learning difficulty. Using a variety of quantitative methods and machine learning techniques to account for phylogenetic relatedness and geographical proximity of languages, we show that there is robust evidence for a relationship between learning difficulty and speaker population size. However, contrary to expectations derived from previous research, our results suggest that languages with more speakers tend to be harder to learn.
According to a widespread conception, quantitative linguistics will eventually be able to explain empirical quantitative findings (such as Zipf’s Law) by deriving them from highly general stochastic linguistic ‘laws’ that are assumed to be part of a general theory of human language (cf. Best (1999) for a summary of possible theoretical positions). Due to their formal proximity to methods used in the so-called exact sciences, theoretical explanations of this kind are assumed to be superior to the supposedly descriptive-only approaches of linguistic structuralism and its successors. In this paper I shall try to argue that on close inspection such claims turn out to be highly problematic, both on linguistic and on science-theoretical grounds.